gebbsen

gebbsen — CS2 Stats

JP76561199700108639[U:1:1739842911]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,003Tracked matches53%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating8,498Light Blue band · top ~62.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#29149 of 39344 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 806 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgebbsenFACEITLevel 6 · 806 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER8,498 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning52
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateLWLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression4.8
Utility4.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.2
Utility4.3
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time627ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 677ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — nuke 4–0
132Biggest win — anubis
8Longest win streak
1210In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 82% over 11mirageWeakest map · 29% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2471729%-0.01
infernoB157847%-0.01
anubisB147750%-0.01
ancientC135838%-0.01
dust2A127558%-0.00
cacheS119282%-0.00
nukeA106460%0.02
office110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

394Matches
49%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
81.2ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10540%0.8614.7
Dust28046%0.9015.2
Anubis4764%0.9716.4
Inferno4560%0.9415.7
Nuke3858%1.2117.8
Ancient3658%0.9716.8
Cache3438%0.9114.3
Vertigo450%1.0515.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
73.0%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
622msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
41.5%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
7.86HE damage / grenade
8.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4864 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.9527% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–13-0.0526%29 Aug
cache16–120.0229%29 Aug
mirage5–130.0422%28 Aug
mirage6–130.1433%27 Aug
anubis13–2-0.0415%26 Aug
anubis13–60.0111%26 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0542%25 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0718%24 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0430%23 Aug
dust213–16-0.0021%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0430%21 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0414%20 Aug
cache11–130.0132%19 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0329%19 Aug
nuke4–00.2117%19 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0220%19 Aug
office13–11-0.0327%18 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0125%17 Aug
nuke13–20.0016%17 Aug
dust213–80.0123%16 Aug
nuke9–130.0024%16 Aug
ancient13–40.0028%13 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0133%11 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0718%11 Aug
inferno13–40.0531%10 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0528%9 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0119%9 Aug
dust213–60.0129%9 Aug
inferno13–90.0135%9 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0320%8 Aug
anubis16–140.0239%8 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0425%8 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0121%7 Aug
ancient13–110.0027%6 Aug
inferno2–90.0125%6 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0628%6 Aug
nuke13–90.0632%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.0418%5 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0120%2 Aug
dust213–110.0020%27 Jul
dust210–13-0.0331%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0317%26 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0224%25 Jul
dust213–10-0.0219%25 Jul
inferno9–1-0.070%25 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0727%23 Jul
dust213–11-0.0119%23 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0514%22 Jul
cache13–8-0.0130%22 Jul
nuke13–6-0.1129%22 Jul
ancient13–11-0.059%22 Jul
cache13–11-0.0519%21 Jul
cache13–40.0126%21 Jul
nuke13–90.0520%21 Jul
nuke16–140.0323%21 Jul
inferno13–110.0426%21 Jul
ancient9–130.0029%20 Jul
cache13–90.0525%20 Jul
inferno11–130.0030%19 Jul
cache7–20.0963%18 Jul
mirage10–130.0547%18 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0321%17 Jul
mirage13–20.1048%17 Jul
cache13–4-0.0526%17 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0229%17 Jul
dust22–13-0.0830%17 Jul
inferno11–130.0330%17 Jul
ancient11–130.0818%17 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0139%17 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0646%17 Jul
cache13–40.0042%17 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0216%17 Jul
mirage10–130.0537%17 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0416%17 Jul
dust27–13-0.0421%16 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0418%16 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0123%16 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0511%16 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0421%16 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0025%15 Jul
anubis15–150.0327%15 Jul
cache13–11-0.0517%15 Jul
mirage13–20.1021%15 Jul
dust213–5-0.0120%15 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0425%15 Jul
anubis13–50.1937%7 Jul
ancient4–130.0119%7 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0315%6 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0425%5 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0322%5 Jul
nuke8–80.0339%5 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0714%4 Jul
dust213–90.0437%3 Jul
mirage7–13-0.039%3 Jul
dust211–130.0629%3 Jul
ancient13–4-0.099%2 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0623%1 Jul
ancient13–90.0529%1 Jul
inferno5–90.0236%30 Jun
inferno8–80.0527%29 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →