boski — CS2 Stats

SE76561199697275204[U:1:1737009476]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

342Tracked matches60%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 4 · 1,000 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84

Positioning48

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–55–2Last 10043%Win rateWWLWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4

Aggression3.4

Utility4.7

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4

Positioning4.8

Utility4.7

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels1.3

Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time528ms−104ms

first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms

Headshot accuracy17.8%−3.3%

first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — nuke 9–4

13–1Biggest win — cache

6Longest win streak

W2Current streak

5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 86% over 7officeWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	20	10–10	50%	0.03
nuke	B	19	10–9	53%	0.05
cache	B	15	7–8	47%	0.07
anubis	C	12	5–7	42%	0.03
office	D	8	2–6	25%	0.07
vertigo	S	7	6–1	86%	0.03
ancient	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01
overpass	—	4	0–4	0%	0.03
warden	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.00
mirage	—	2	0–2	0%	0.03
train	—	2	0–2	0%	0.04
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
dust2	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
stronghold	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches

50%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

87.3ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	2	50%	0.98	15.0
Mirage	2	0%	0.75	12.5
Ancient	1	100%	1.45	16.0
Overpass	1	100%	1.77	23.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy

37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.0%Spray accuracy

86.0%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

537msReaction time

19.2%T opening success

40.2%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

1.7%Flash assists

7.82HE damage / grenade

9.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4972 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 19.2465% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	13–7	-0.00	22%	27 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.00	10%	26 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	11%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.03	27%	26 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	0.02	28%	25 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	16%	25 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	9%	24 Aug →
cache	17–19	-0.01	23%	23 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.03	15%	23 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.10	18%	23 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.09	18%	23 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.05	10%	23 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.01	17%	21 Aug →
inferno	3–12	-0.03	19%	21 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.05	11%	21 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.06	27%	20 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	21%	20 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	-0.00	6%	20 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.06	27%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.08	13%	19 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.04	16%	19 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.06	15%	19 Aug →
debris	8–8	0.02	39%	19 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	-0.00	10%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	18%	18 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	21%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.02	10%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.00	15%	13 Aug →
vertigo	9–6	0.12	25%	13 Aug →
nuke	9–4	0.21	18%	13 Aug →
overpass	3–9	0.02	21%	13 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.00	24%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.05	9%	10 Aug →
anubis	6–1	0.01	38%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	22%	9 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.02	16%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.02	20%	31 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.08	0%	31 Jul →
office	6–13	0.03	24%	30 May →
train	5–13	0.06	23%	30 May →
anubis	7–13	0.06	13%	12 May →
cache	13–9	0.11	15%	7 May →
cache	7–13	0.11	17%	6 May →
cache	13–4	0.15	17%	4 May →
cache	4–7	0.09	15%	3 May →
cache	2–13	0.00	18%	3 May →
cache	13–1	0.12	25%	3 May →
cache	2–13	0.06	24%	3 May →
cache	13–7	0.18	14%	3 May →
nuke	13–8	0.01	19%	5 Apr →
inferno	2–13	-0.02	7%	5 Apr →
nuke	5–8	0.12	23%	4 Apr →
nuke	7–13	0.03	16%	4 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.04	27%	27 Mar →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	24%	26 Mar →
anubis	13–4	0.06	19%	26 Mar →
anubis	11–13	0.00	15%	23 Mar →
anubis	13–9	0.12	13%	23 Mar →
ancient	13–5	0.03	20%	22 Mar →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	17%	22 Mar →
anubis	10–13	0.02	19%	22 Mar →
nuke	13–6	0.03	20%	21 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	8%	21 Mar →
office	9–13	0.05	19%	19 Mar →
inferno	10–0	0.11	32%	18 Mar →
office	13–5	0.13	28%	18 Mar →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	18%	18 Mar →
office	8–13	0.01	22%	18 Mar →
nuke	13–4	0.13	25%	18 Mar →
inferno	10–13	0.07	13%	17 Mar →
office	11–13	0.08	25%	16 Mar →
nuke	5–13	0.02	24%	16 Mar →
overpass	1–13	0.00	21%	15 Mar →
inferno	16–13	0.00	18%	15 Mar →
nuke	13–2	0.11	15%	15 Mar →
nuke	15–15	-0.00	16%	15 Mar →
office	4–13	0.01	21%	15 Mar →
nuke	6–13	0.00	28%	14 Mar →
inferno	7–13	0.05	19%	14 Mar →
anubis	3–13	0.01	13%	14 Mar →
nuke	13–2	0.16	13%	14 Mar →
inferno	5–9	0.13	24%	14 Mar →
ancient	2–13	-0.03	14%	12 Mar →
inferno	7–13	0.08	22%	12 Mar →
office	13–11	0.11	24%	11 Mar →
overpass	6–13	0.07	16%	11 Mar →
ancient	9–13	0.03	20%	10 Mar →
nuke	6–9	0.02	22%	10 Mar →
anubis	13–11	0.07	17%	10 Mar →
office	10–13	0.15	31%	9 Mar →
overpass	2–13	0.01	23%	9 Mar →
stronghold	2–13	0.05	16%	8 Mar →
warden	10–13	0.03	26%	8 Mar →
warden	9–13	-0.02	34%	7 Mar →
inferno	6–13	0.05	25%	7 Mar →
train	7–13	0.03	22%	7 Mar →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	22%	5 Mar →
nuke	13–7	0.06	17%	4 Mar →
anubis	5–13	0.09	22%	4 Mar →
warden	9–13	-0.01	26%	4 Mar →