Dreezer — CS2 Stats

76561199667595495[U:1:1707329767]Steam profile ↗

1,676Tracked matches58%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,819Purple band · top ~13.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10967 of 22216 tracked

FaceitLevel 4 · 926 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84

Positioning59

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateTWWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4

Aggression6.0

Utility4.7

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4

Positioning5.9

Utility4.7

Mechanics8.2

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact7.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time515ms−54ms

first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms

Headshot accuracy11.5%+0.8%

first ⅓ avg 10.7% → last ⅓ avg 11.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–5

13–1Biggest win — anubis

6Longest win streak

8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 15ancientWeakest map · 31% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	26	11–15	42%	0.02
nuke	A	19	12–7	63%	0.02
anubis	S	15	10–5	67%	0.03
ancient	D	13	4–9	31%	-0.00
mirage	D	12	4–8	33%	0.01
cache	C	8	3–5	38%	0.03
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

236Matches

51%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

76.9ADR

30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	86	55%	1.02	14.4
Ancient	37	35%	1.10	15.4
Mirage	34	53%	1.12	15.2
Nuke	31	48%	1.20	16.2
Inferno	17	59%	1.14	14.7
Anubis	16	50%	1.24	18.4
Cache	11	64%	1.47	15.9
Overpass	3	33%	0.68	11.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.1%Headshot accuracy

40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.8%Spray accuracy

87.1%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

512msReaction time

37.1%T opening success

44.2%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

4.7%Flash assists

6.24HE damage / grenade

12.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.1184% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4742 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.1206% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	15–15	0.01	14%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.02	15%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	30%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	11%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.03	23%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.10	14%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	4%	26 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	20%	26 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	14%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	11%	25 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.00	9%	25 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.10	8%	24 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	2%	23 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.01	7%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	12%	22 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.07	7%	22 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	10%	22 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	15%	21 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.01	11%	20 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	6%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	14%	20 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	6%	19 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.00	8%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	16%	19 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.07	13%	18 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	9%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.07	10%	16 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	9%	16 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	4%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.03	6%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.04	15%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	16%	15 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	13%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	7%	13 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	8%	13 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	9%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.05	12%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.15	7%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	4%	11 Aug →
ancient	12–16	0.00	12%	11 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.05	16%	10 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.00	18%	9 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.07	4%	9 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	7%	9 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.04	14%	8 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.05	11%	8 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.07	22%	7 Aug →
inferno	9–3	0.12	17%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.09	13%	7 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.04	6%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	0%	6 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.03	9%	5 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.00	5%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.05	6%	5 Aug →
nuke	6–9	-0.06	26%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.10	9%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	16%	3 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	13%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.10	12%	31 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.01	13%	29 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.03	5%	29 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	7%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	11%	28 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	3%	24 Jul →
inferno	6–9	0.02	8%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	12%	23 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	9%	23 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	9%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.05	10%	22 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	13%	22 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	5%	22 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	10%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.10	23%	21 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.12	11%	21 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.06	16%	21 Jul →
nuke	16–13	-0.02	11%	20 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.02	20%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.04	14%	19 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.03	10%	19 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.06	11%	19 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.00	8%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.06	13%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.03	3%	18 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	10%	18 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.01	12%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	19%	18 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	3%	16 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.06	13%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	4%	15 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	10%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	3%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.02	8%	14 Jul →
anubis	16–13	0.05	7%	13 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.06	7%	13 Jul →
cache	13–16	0.07	15%	13 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	8%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.02	4%	11 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.01	13%	11 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	20%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.13	12%	11 Jul →