zayne_666๐Ÿ–ค

zayne_666๐Ÿ–ค โ€” CS2 Stats

CA76561199642899426[U:1:1682633698]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

956Tracked matches43%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,285Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band ยท top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1755 of 20812 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 ยท 1,540 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzayne_666๐Ÿ–คFACEITLevel 8 ยท 1,540 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,285 ยท Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning51
Utility62

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55โ€“44โ€“1Last 10055%Win rateWWLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate ยท -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler โ€” Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression3.7
Utility6.2
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 29% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.1
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01โˆ’0.02
first โ…“ avg 0.03 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.01
Reaction time516msโˆ’64ms
first โ…“ avg 580ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%โˆ’1.1%
first โ…“ avg 18.9% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating โ€” ancient 13โ€“5
13โ€“0Biggest win โ€” mirage
9Longest win streak
W2Current streak
10โ€“9In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map ยท 65% over 26infernoWeakest map ยท 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2915โ€“1452%0.01
dust2S2617โ€“965%0.03
ancientS1711โ€“665%0.04
infernoD112โ€“918%0.02
cacheA95โ€“456%-0.00
nukeA53โ€“260%0.02
anubisโ€”32โ€“167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

387Matches
52%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
80.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15556%1.3717.4
Inferno6743%1.2917.8
Ancient4751%1.2917.9
Dust24751%1.1717.4
Vertigo3462%1.5818.5
Anubis1833%1.3016.4
Nuke944%1.3818.9
Cache540%1.3414.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
9.5ยฐPreaim
513msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
8.01HE damage / grenade
25.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.9988% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy โ†’Inferno grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16โ€“130.0114%26 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“110.1323%25 Aug โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.0618%24 Aug โ†’
ancient0โ€“13-0.1020%24 Aug โ†’
mirage2โ€“12-0.0015%19 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“0-0.048%18 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0610%18 Aug โ†’
dust216โ€“130.0312%18 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“80.0420%18 Aug โ†’
dust25โ€“13-0.0124%16 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“2-0.0110%15 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0320%15 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“130.0915%15 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.0923%15 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0123%15 Aug โ†’
ancient8โ€“130.0818%15 Aug โ†’
mirage8โ€“130.0018%15 Aug โ†’
mirage7โ€“130.0026%15 Aug โ†’
ancient14โ€“160.0716%15 Aug โ†’
dust216โ€“14-0.0518%14 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“16-0.0117%14 Aug โ†’
dust216โ€“120.0625%14 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“13-0.0626%13 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0621%13 Aug โ†’
nuke7โ€“13-0.0724%13 Aug โ†’
mirage10โ€“130.0312%12 Aug โ†’
cache5โ€“13-0.0815%12 Aug โ†’
dust210โ€“130.0219%12 Aug โ†’
mirage6โ€“130.0914%11 Aug โ†’
ancient7โ€“13-0.0118%11 Aug โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0319%11 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0611%11 Aug โ†’
dust29โ€“130.0216%11 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“30.0524%10 Aug โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0327%10 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“100.0114%9 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“100.0229%9 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“100.0118%9 Aug โ†’
inferno12โ€“120.0724%7 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0127%6 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“30.0321%6 Aug โ†’
anubis3โ€“13-0.0713%6 Aug โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0012%6 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“3-0.0021%5 Aug โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0418%5 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“40.0424%5 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“40.0214%4 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“4-0.0529%4 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“80.0913%3 Aug โ†’
cache10โ€“130.0518%3 Aug โ†’
dust211โ€“130.0619%3 Aug โ†’
cache5โ€“13-0.0626%3 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“80.0625%3 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0221%3 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0517%2 Aug โ†’
dust211โ€“13-0.0123%2 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0122%2 Aug โ†’
ancient8โ€“13-0.049%2 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0319%2 Aug โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.0113%2 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“10.0750%1 Aug โ†’
dust211โ€“13-0.0420%31 Jul โ†’
dust212โ€“16-0.0025%31 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“40.0514%31 Jul โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0317%31 Jul โ†’
inferno6โ€“130.1121%31 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0121%31 Jul โ†’
dust211โ€“130.0331%30 Jul โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.029%30 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“80.0625%30 Jul โ†’
inferno10โ€“13-0.0017%30 Jul โ†’
inferno4โ€“13-0.0424%30 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“90.0425%30 Jul โ†’
mirage6โ€“10.0922%29 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0310%29 Jul โ†’
inferno2โ€“13-0.0033%28 Jul โ†’
dust216โ€“12-0.0215%28 Jul โ†’
inferno7โ€“130.0214%28 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0316%28 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0018%28 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“8-0.0221%28 Jul โ†’
dust29โ€“13-0.0112%28 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“70.0421%27 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“50.029%27 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“16-0.0219%27 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.0014%27 Jul โ†’
cache5โ€“130.0322%27 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“00.1012%26 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“50.1417%26 Jul โ†’
anubis16โ€“140.0516%26 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“60.0821%26 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“6-0.0118%25 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“50.0925%24 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0626%24 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“70.0313%23 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“50.1125%23 Jul โ†’
ancient10โ€“130.1019%23 Jul โ†’
anubis16โ€“130.0618%22 Jul โ†’
inferno14โ€“160.0617%18 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“110.0319%18 Jul โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’