𝙈𝙞𝙡𝙖 — CS2 Stats

AR76561199573376893[U:1:1613111165]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,289Tracked matches67%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#22900 of 59724 tracked

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning53

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–40–3Last 10057%Win rateWWWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.3

Aggression9.5

Utility6.0

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels4.0

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning5.3

Utility6.0

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels4.0

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time647ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 685ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms

Headshot accuracy32.8%−5.6%

first ⅓ avg 38.4% → last ⅓ avg 32.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 9–1

13–1Biggest win — cache

7Longest win streak

W7Current streak

11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 43% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	28	15–13	54%	0.02
ancient	S	20	13–7	65%	0.03
anubis	C	14	6–8	43%	0.00
inferno	A	13	8–5	62%	0.03
nuke	B	12	6–6	50%	0.01
cache	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
mirage	S	5	4–1	80%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,082Matches

50%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

81.3ADR

61%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	242	47%	1.08	17.0
Dust2	212	52%	1.10	16.9
Ancient	194	50%	1.13	16.5
Anubis	184	48%	1.06	16.6
Inferno	109	59%	1.04	16.1
Nuke	74	49%	1.09	16.4
Overpass	26	62%	1.25	15.9
Cache	20	35%	1.02	16.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

32.0%Headshot accuracy

29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

29.0%Spray accuracy

83.6%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

643msReaction time

42.3%T opening success

49.5%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

7.2%Flash assists

8.95HE damage / grenade

11.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4643 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–11	0.02	29%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	31%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.09	31%	30 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	33%	30 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.00	28%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.02	22%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.05	44%	29 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.03	46%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.00	43%	29 Aug →
anubis	3–9	0.02	28%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	27%	29 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.08	39%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	21%	28 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.01	13%	28 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	53%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.05	28%	28 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.03	18%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.00	30%	27 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	44%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.10	41%	27 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	17%	27 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	41%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.04	29%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	24%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	40%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.06	30%	26 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	38%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.14	28%	26 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.03	30%	26 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.01	33%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.09	37%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	28%	23 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.02	59%	23 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	32%	23 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.06	32%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	33%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.03	39%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.04	27%	23 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.07	27%	23 Aug →
ancient	2–9	-0.05	13%	22 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.04	29%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.01	33%	22 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.00	23%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.10	34%	19 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	33%	18 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.04	29%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.03	21%	17 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.06	28%	17 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.06	27%	16 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	24%	14 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.06	41%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.05	38%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–16	0.01	44%	14 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.02	50%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.04	44%	13 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	47%	13 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	41%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.03	32%	12 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	45%	12 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.12	20%	12 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.09	32%	12 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.00	31%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.11	28%	11 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	43%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.07	48%	10 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.04	39%	10 Aug →
inferno	9–4	0.11	32%	9 Aug →
inferno	7–9	0.12	45%	9 Aug →
inferno	9–4	-0.02	38%	8 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.05	46%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.00	45%	8 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.10	44%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	34%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	39%	8 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	33%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.09	39%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.04	42%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	40%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	35%	7 Aug →
ancient	3–0	-0.01	50%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.07	37%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.04	41%	6 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.04	50%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.06	34%	6 Aug →
inferno	9–1	0.15	32%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.05	42%	5 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.03	21%	5 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.04	32%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.00	31%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.13	40%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	27%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.05	43%	4 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.09	33%	4 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.05	41%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.03	42%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	33%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.04	39%	3 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	39%	3 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.08	34%	3 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.11	47%	2 Aug →