GigglyJelqer710

GigglyJelqer710 — CS2 Stats

US76561199571489172[U:1:1611223444]Steam profile ↗

2,294Tracked matches33%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,185 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGigglyJelqer710FACEITLevel 8 · 1,185 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning51
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4852Last 10048%Win rateLLWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2
Aggression7.1
Utility6.2
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.1
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time466ms−86ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 466ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−4.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — inferno 9–1
132Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 38% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2491538%0.01
mirageB22111150%0.01
ancientB189950%-0.01
cacheC146843%-0.01
nukeC83538%0.02
infernoS65183%0.11
anubisA53260%-0.01
debris21150%0.05
eldorado110100%0.23

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

427Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
84.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210950%1.0717.0
Mirage10949%1.0916.4
Ancient6558%1.0916.8
Cache5050%1.0316.3
Anubis3546%0.9715.1
Nuke2959%1.1716.6
Inferno1937%1.1216.1
Overpass1060%1.0818.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
468msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
10.47HE damage / grenade
12.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.3106% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–130.0011%28 Aug
mirage20–220.0217%27 Aug
inferno9–70.0623%27 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0623%27 Aug
dust28–13-0.0418%25 Aug
mirage13–100.0218%24 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0016%24 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0318%22 Aug
cache3–13-0.119%21 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0116%21 Aug
ancient13–100.0421%20 Aug
ancient13–50.1042%19 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0021%19 Aug
dust216–13-0.0419%18 Aug
inferno9–30.1917%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.0719%18 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0223%18 Aug
ancient13–80.0323%18 Aug
mirage13–70.0723%18 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0316%18 Aug
dust25–13-0.0118%18 Aug
dust214–160.0421%18 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0334%17 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0017%17 Aug
cache13–11-0.0012%17 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0515%17 Aug
mirage13–40.0524%16 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0419%15 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0517%15 Aug
inferno9–40.1229%14 Aug
dust23–130.0112%13 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0720%13 Aug
cache5–13-0.039%12 Aug
cache13–110.0120%12 Aug
dust213–80.0631%12 Aug
cache13–8-0.0022%11 Aug
mirage5–13-0.028%11 Aug
dust211–130.0428%11 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0624%11 Aug
ancient17–19-0.0219%11 Aug
dust213–16-0.0419%10 Aug
mirage10–130.0514%10 Aug
dust213–60.0942%10 Aug
ancient13–20.0422%10 Aug
dust211–13-0.0021%10 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0532%9 Aug
dust214–16-0.0314%8 Aug
nuke19–160.0614%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0419%8 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0413%7 Aug
inferno9–60.0415%7 Aug
inferno9–10.2610%7 Aug
ancient13–110.0128%7 Aug
dust219–16-0.0116%6 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0536%6 Aug
dust27–13-0.0419%6 Aug
ancient13–80.0816%6 Aug
mirage13–40.0821%5 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0514%5 Aug
cache16–19-0.0917%5 Aug
anubis5–130.0120%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0626%5 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0020%5 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0121%4 Aug
dust23–13-0.0213%4 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0225%3 Aug
mirage3–80.0412%3 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0220%3 Aug
cache16–140.0618%3 Aug
mirage13–110.0435%2 Aug
dust211–130.0120%1 Aug
dust216–120.0524%1 Aug
mirage13–30.0424%1 Aug
dust213–20.0830%1 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0221%30 Jul
anubis13–80.0213%30 Jul
cache6–13-0.0123%27 Jul
dust29–13-0.0430%26 Jul
cache13–9-0.0118%24 Jul
ancient2–13-0.1022%24 Jul
ancient13–60.0024%22 Jul
cache11–130.0323%21 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0113%20 Jul
anubis13–70.0228%19 Jul
dust213–90.0533%19 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0539%14 Jul
dust26–13-0.0418%14 Jul
cache12–160.0028%13 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0517%13 Jul
dust210–130.0127%12 Jul
dust213–80.0326%12 Jul
cache13–110.0126%12 Jul
mirage13–90.0116%12 Jul
dust213–40.0725%12 Jul
debris6–9-0.0819%12 Jul
nuke9–60.1723%12 Jul
nuke9–10.0921%12 Jul
debris9–40.1931%12 Jul
eldorado9–10.2333%12 Jul
cache3–13-0.0319%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →