zAoEphoenix

zAoEphoenix — CS2 Stats

76561199565981711[U:1:1605715983]Steam profile ↗

607Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzAoEphoenixFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning53
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54397Last 10054%Win rateWLLLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5
Aggression6.8
Utility6.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.3
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time602ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — debris 9–3
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
53In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

wardenBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35181751%0.02
dust2S96367%0.05
nukeA85363%0.01
infernoC83538%-0.03
ancientB84450%0.02
wardenS65183%0.06
officeC52340%-0.02
alpineC52340%0.03
vertigo41325%0.00
cache32167%0.02
overpass220100%0.07
debris21150%0.08
anubis220100%-0.01
eldorado110100%0.19
stronghold1010%-0.01
italy1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
20%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
89.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust220%0.9313.5
Mirage250%1.4416.5
Inferno10%0.8713.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
612msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
46.3%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
13.48HE damage / grenade
8.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.0613% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.0710%17 Jul
inferno4–13-0.086%17 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0211%17 Jul
dust28–130.0526%17 Jul
overpass13–50.1123%15 Jul
mirage13–20.0414%15 Jul
mirage13–20.1032%15 Jul
cache8–13-0.0215%15 Jul
cache13–60.0222%15 Jul
nuke4–130.0229%15 Jul
dust29–130.0317%15 Jul
inferno1–9-0.1626%15 Jul
vertigo4–9-0.0730%15 Jul
eldorado9–30.1927%15 Jul
inferno9–10.099%15 Jul
debris9–30.1931%15 Jul
debris6–9-0.0317%15 Jul
mirage13–90.0615%5 Jul
inferno16–120.0016%7 Jun
dust213–50.0815%7 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0224%7 Jun
office13–70.0219%6 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0211%5 Jun
nuke13–6-0.049%5 Jun
dust213–20.1218%5 Jun
office2–13-0.0629%5 Jun
vertigo10–130.0113%5 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0421%5 Jun
mirage9–130.0420%27 May
mirage8–1-0.0133%27 May
mirage5–13-0.048%27 May
nuke13–80.0521%27 May
nuke10–13-0.0113%27 May
anubis13–8-0.0436%27 May
ancient4–13-0.0615%10 May
mirage7–13-0.076%10 May
mirage7–10.0113%10 May
overpass13–50.0319%10 May
mirage13–10.016%10 May
mirage8–13-0.0546%10 May
anubis13–100.0217%10 May
vertigo13–50.0312%10 May
cache13–30.0429%10 May
inferno8–13-0.0429%10 May
mirage13–10.1242%10 May
alpine13–40.0314%10 May
inferno13–110.029%11 Apr
dust213–80.0419%11 Apr
nuke2–130.0115%11 Apr
office13–110.0118%11 Apr
dust213–20.0435%11 Apr
dust213–50.0924%30 Mar
dust213–80.0336%30 Mar
mirage12–120.0115%30 Mar
ancient13–70.0914%30 Mar
ancient13–80.0517%30 Mar
ancient13–80.0514%30 Mar
ancient12–120.0221%30 Mar
warden13–90.0531%30 Mar
mirage13–40.0825%30 Mar
mirage13–110.0225%9 Mar
mirage7–130.0913%9 Mar
mirage13–80.0212%9 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0024%9 Mar
mirage7–130.0224%9 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0514%9 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0013%6 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0510%6 Mar
ancient13–90.0114%6 Mar
alpine5–130.0034%6 Mar
mirage11–130.0128%6 Mar
alpine6–130.0913%6 Mar
dust210–13-0.019%3 Mar
mirage9–130.0015%3 Mar
mirage13–80.0115%3 Mar
alpine2–13-0.0211%3 Mar
warden13–20.0412%3 Mar
warden11–130.1014%3 Mar
nuke13–50.0017%28 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0412%27 Feb
mirage13–30.0117%27 Feb
mirage7–40.0118%27 Feb
mirage12–120.1010%25 Feb
office12–12-0.0210%25 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0421%25 Feb
alpine13–70.0627%22 Feb
warden13–50.0111%22 Feb
mirage13–40.0617%21 Feb
warden13–110.0513%21 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0319%21 Feb
mirage7–130.0224%21 Feb
warden13–50.119%21 Feb
stronghold12–12-0.0119%20 Feb
mirage13–90.0813%20 Feb
mirage4–13-0.073%20 Feb
office12–12-0.0422%20 Feb
mirage13–30.1319%18 Feb
mirage12–120.0310%17 Feb
italy3–13-0.0316%17 Feb
vertigo4–90.0422%15 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →