Varios Limoes taiti

Varios Limoes taiti — CS2 Stats

ID76561199529850201[U:1:1569584473]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

864Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,291Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
Premier CS Rating15,957Purple band · top ~24.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16974 of 28539 tracked
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate40.5%44.1%47.2%6.7% short
Shot accuracy0.7%11.4%12.7%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.031.090.22 short
Match win rate41.3%45.2%46.6%5.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVarios Limoes taitiPREMIER15,957 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning38
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateLTWWWWLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6
Aggression4.4
Utility5.2
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 671ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning3.8
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact6.2

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time679ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 698ms → last ⅓ avg 679ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — nuke 13–4
131Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
134In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11cacheWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24111346%-0.02
dust2B178947%-0.02
ancientA149564%-0.02
anubisA117464%-0.04
nukeS118373%0.01
cacheB115645%-0.01
infernoA106460%-0.03
train1010%-0.07
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

29,456Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
1,710Matches
41.3%Match win rate
40.5%Headshot %
0.7%Shot accuracy
2,906MVPs
638Hours (in match)
797Bombs planted
321Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,394inferno
2,195dust2
1,577nuke
1,114vertigo
560train
17ar_shoots
13ar_baggage
4cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.0%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
671msReaction time
17.0%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
6.96HE damage / grenade
12.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.9871% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train7–13-0.0722%28 Aug
anubis12–12-0.120%26 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0312%20 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0311%20 Aug
nuke13–20.0628%20 Aug
cache13–50.1018%20 Aug
mirage9–130.0114%14 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0423%13 Aug
inferno13–9-0.038%12 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0230%12 Aug
dust213–16-0.0025%12 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0516%10 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0127%7 Aug
dust213–7-0.0424%6 Aug
inferno13–60.0213%5 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0923%5 Aug
dust28–130.0319%4 Aug
dust213–110.0721%4 Aug
cache11–13-0.0424%30 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0111%30 Jul
dust25–13-0.0810%29 Jul
cache13–80.0012%29 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0314%29 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0420%29 Jul
anubis13–70.0417%29 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0913%28 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0714%28 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0115%28 Jul
dust213–110.0215%28 Jul
cache11–13-0.0310%28 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0513%27 Jul
nuke13–10.0414%27 Jul
cache10–13-0.057%26 Jul
dust26–13-0.0618%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0817%26 Jul
anubis13–70.0017%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0318%25 Jul
dust213–110.0132%24 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0313%24 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0621%24 Jul
mirage8–130.0121%24 Jul
nuke5–130.0020%24 Jul
ancient13–5-0.036%23 Jul
anubis12–5-0.017%23 Jul
nuke13–7-0.088%22 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0213%22 Jul
nuke13–40.1631%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0217%20 Jul
ancient13–100.0212%20 Jul
cache12–16-0.075%20 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0323%20 Jul
anubis13–8-0.085%19 Jul
dust213–10-0.0413%18 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0616%17 Jul
ancient10–4-0.0514%17 Jul
cache13–110.0713%17 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0714%17 Jul
dust24–13-0.0113%16 Jul
nuke13–7-0.037%16 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0019%16 Jul
cache10–13-0.0314%15 Jul
ancient8–110.087%15 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0833%15 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0315%15 Jul
dust213–60.0314%15 Jul
mirage9–130.0721%15 Jul
mirage6–130.0117%15 Jul
cache7–13-0.0411%15 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0413%15 Jul
cache13–8-0.0417%14 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0215%14 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0216%14 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0216%14 Jul
dust213–110.0421%14 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0615%14 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0128%14 Jul
mirage13–8-0.004%13 Jul
dust28–13-0.0610%13 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0115%12 Jul
dust210–13-0.0920%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.0413%10 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0120%9 Jul
dust29–13-0.0618%9 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0626%9 Jul
mirage13–90.0225%9 Jul
cache13–4-0.0017%9 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0117%8 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0321%6 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0510%4 Jul
mirage13–110.0125%4 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0712%4 Jul
overpass9–13-0.0222%2 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0216%2 Jul
inferno16–140.0417%2 Jul
dust213–9-0.0020%1 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0217%1 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0416%1 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0120%1 Jul
nuke13–20.0310%1 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0522%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →