SamW — CS2 Stats

76561199528006642[U:1:1567740914]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

316Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating13,025Blue band · top ~38.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#24452 of 36457 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning60

Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–55–1Last 10044%Win rateLWLWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1

Aggression9.3

Utility3.8

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels5.2

Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning6.0

Utility3.8

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels5.2

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time580ms−57ms

first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms

Headshot accuracy19.2%+2.7%

first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — anubis 13–5

13–1Biggest win — ancient

7Longest win streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 59% over 27nukeWeakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	27	16–11	59%	-0.00
ancient	C	19	7–12	37%	0.00
mirage	C	18	8–10	44%	-0.02
inferno	C	13	5–8	38%	0.01
nuke	D	9	2–7	22%	-0.01
anubis	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.02
cache	—	4	1–3	25%	0.02
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

111Matches

47%Win rate

1.04Avg K/D

79.7ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	28	36%	0.97	12.8
Dust2	20	70%	1.29	17.9
Ancient	18	56%	1.08	15.2
Inferno	14	36%	1.04	14.6
Vertigo	10	30%	0.79	11.4
Nuke	7	43%	0.88	13.3
Cache	7	57%	1.10	13.9
Anubis	6	50%	1.06	17.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy

33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.9%Spray accuracy

78.3%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

588msReaction time

40.5%T opening success

60.9%CT opening success

0.39Enemies flashed / flash

7.2%Flash assists

4.90HE damage / grenade

8.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3892 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–16	0.01	15%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.00	17%	23 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	14%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.08	20%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.12	20%	15 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	23%	15 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	15%	11 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	19%	11 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	11%	11 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.04	17%	11 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.00	29%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.08	18%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	20%	9 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	29%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.03	18%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	17%	9 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.00	16%	9 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	17%	8 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.00	23%	8 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.08	17%	7 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	19%	7 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	23%	6 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.11	22%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–1	-0.00	17%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	12%	5 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.08	15%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.06	30%	5 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	15%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	17%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.06	35%	4 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.08	16%	31 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.07	10%	30 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	27%	30 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	16%	27 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	14%	26 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.03	27%	26 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.08	18%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	11%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	24%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.06	10%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	14%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	22%	24 Jul →
anubis	8–1	0.01	22%	24 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.07	25%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.13	37%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	14%	24 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.01	20%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.01	19%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.05	20%	22 Jul →
dust2	12–16	0.08	23%	22 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.05	25%	20 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	32%	19 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.04	11%	18 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	4%	18 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.13	8%	17 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	25%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	24%	17 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	20%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.04	7%	15 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	21%	14 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	24%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	10%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	11%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–1	-0.04	25%	10 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	17%	9 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	17%	9 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	41%	8 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.02	20%	7 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.07	19%	24 Apr →
inferno	7–13	0.04	22%	24 Apr →
mirage	1–11	-0.01	24%	2 Jan →
mirage	13–7	-0.07	6%	2 Jan →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	11%	31 Dec →
nuke	3–13	0.01	18%	29 Dec →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	19%	13 Dec →
mirage	13–6	0.02	9%	13 Dec →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	17%	9 Dec →
dust2	4–13	-0.09	14%	8 Dec →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	6%	7 Dec →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	16%	1 Dec →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	8%	20 Oct →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	14%	7 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	18%	7 Sept →
dust2	13–4	0.03	19%	7 Sept →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	24%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.02	19%	22 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	13%	16 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	24%	27 May →
ancient	10–13	0.02	20%	26 May →
vertigo	13–3	0.10	23%	26 May →
mirage	13–3	-0.03	25%	26 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	14%	26 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	15%	23 May →
dust2	13–11	0.04	23%	23 May →
ancient	12–12	0.05	21%	19 May →
vertigo	13–11	0.01	17%	19 May →
ancient	1–13	-0.05	6%	18 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	7%	18 May →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	10%	18 May →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	22%	18 May →