puttforedough — CS2 Stats

76561199492952602[U:1:1532686874]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

252Tracked matches45%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim62

Positioning47

Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateWTWLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.2

Aggression4.5

Utility1.4

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels1.5

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 675ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2

Positioning4.7

Utility1.4

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time655ms−74ms

first ⅓ avg 729ms → last ⅓ avg 655ms

Headshot accuracy11.8%+1.2%

first ⅓ avg 10.6% → last ⅓ avg 11.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — anubis 13–9

13–0Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 15dust2Weakest map · 33% over 21

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	21	7–14	33%	-0.03
mirage	A	18	10–8	56%	-0.03
nuke	S	15	11–4	73%	0.00
cache	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.03
inferno	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.04
ancient	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.03
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.01
overpass	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.03
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.01
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.06
train	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches

0%Win rate

0.40Avg K/D

48.9ADR

22%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	1	0%	0.33	6.0
Mirage	1	0%	0.47	7.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.6%Headshot accuracy

36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.9%Spray accuracy

81.5%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

675msReaction time

22.3%T opening success

49.3%CT opening success

0.24Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

7.94HE damage / grenade

1.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.569% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2375 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.3457% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–11	0.04	20%	28 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.01	6%	22 Jul →
poseidon	9–5	-0.06	10%	22 Jul →
cache	1–7	-0.02	4%	22 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	15%	22 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	24%	21 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.07	4%	21 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.08	15%	21 Jul →
ancient	8–3	-0.01	6%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.10	8%	19 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	9%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	13%	8 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	9%	8 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	22%	30 Jun →
ancient	13–4	-0.04	12%	30 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	10%	22 Jun →
inferno	2–0	-0.03	0%	22 Jun →
dust2	12–16	-0.07	17%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.11	17%	18 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	10%	5 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.04	8%	5 Jun →
overpass	3–13	-0.03	0%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.00	19%	4 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.10	14%	1 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.03	19%	31 May →
nuke	13–9	0.00	12%	30 May →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	18%	30 May →
nuke	9–13	-0.09	8%	21 May →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	3%	20 May →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	19%	20 May →
mirage	13–2	-0.03	11%	19 May →
nuke	13–9	-0.07	16%	19 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	14%	18 May →
cache	9–13	-0.02	12%	17 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.08	8%	17 May →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	8%	15 May →
cache	3–13	-0.04	9%	15 May →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	8%	14 May →
mirage	13–3	0.06	7%	14 May →
cache	13–11	0.02	8%	14 May →
cache	13–9	-0.02	6%	13 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	8%	13 May →
overpass	6–13	-0.05	10%	13 May →
dust2	13–4	0.02	9%	12 May →
inferno	3–10	0.03	4%	12 May →
mirage	13–0	0.01	4%	12 May →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	20%	12 May →
anubis	6–13	-0.06	6%	12 May →
mirage	16–14	0.00	8%	12 May →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	4%	12 May →
cache	8–13	-0.02	5%	12 May →
nuke	13–7	0.08	8%	12 May →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	3%	11 May →
ancient	8–13	0.00	6%	11 May →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	8%	11 May →
cache	3–13	0.01	19%	11 May →
anubis	13–9	0.12	6%	11 May →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	13%	11 May →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	7%	11 May →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	22%	11 May →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	8%	10 May →
mirage	13–5	0.06	16%	10 May →
ancient	6–13	0.02	13%	10 May →
dust2	8–13	0.03	16%	10 May →
nuke	13–8	0.06	5%	10 May →
nuke	13–9	0.09	10%	10 May →
cache	4–13	-0.10	10%	10 May →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	16%	10 May →
cache	6–13	-0.03	16%	10 May →
cache	13–10	-0.06	15%	9 May →
cache	13–4	-0.00	13%	9 May →
inferno	12–12	-0.05	7%	9 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	15%	9 May →
nuke	9–1	0.11	11%	9 May →
vertigo	13–5	0.09	16%	9 May →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	11%	9 May →
dust2	13–5	0.08	11%	9 May →
nuke	13–10	0.03	22%	9 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	4%	3 May →
inferno	10–7	-0.09	8%	3 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.11	4%	3 May →
mirage	13–6	-0.08	16%	2 May →
cache	12–12	-0.04	13%	2 May →
mirage	12–12	-0.08	14%	1 May →
inferno	13–4	-0.07	5%	1 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.11	3%	30 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.09	8%	29 Apr →
cache	13–10	-0.05	8%	29 Apr →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	8%	29 Apr →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	6%	27 Apr →
overpass	7–13	-0.02	6%	26 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	11%	26 Apr →
ancient	5–13	-0.08	8%	26 Apr →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	13%	24 Apr →
vertigo	11–6	-0.07	7%	23 Apr →
ancient	13–6	-0.04	13%	23 Apr →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	8%	23 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	12%	23 Apr →
dust2	12–12	-0.04	14%	22 Apr →
train	13–11	-0.09	8%	22 Apr →