ℜ𝔞𝔱𝔐𝔞𝔫 — CS2 Stats

76561199492103508[U:1:1531837780]

1,568Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 Developing
Premier CS Rating16,138Purple band · top ~23.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18518 of 31715 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGℜ𝔞𝔱𝔐𝔞𝔫FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,138 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning50
Utility9

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47449Last 10047%Win rateWLLWWLWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5
Aggression7.3
Utility0.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.0
Utility0.9
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact8.8

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time603ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy12.5%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.0% → last ⅓ avg 12.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — vertigo 12–12
131Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC1971237%-0.01
dust2C1771041%-0.03
cacheB158753%0.00
nukeA148657%-0.01
infernoA117464%-0.01
anubisD103730%-0.03
ancientB84450%0.00
vertigo42250%0.08
train21150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
61%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
79.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage580%0.8914.0
Nuke3100%1.1814.3
Inferno250%1.2016.5
Anubis2100%1.1015.5
Dust220%0.8413.0
Vertigo250%1.2225.0
Train10%0.406.0
Ancient10%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.8%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
72.0%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
601msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.14Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
3.74HE damage / grenade
0.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.767% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1446 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.6278% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–2-0.017%26 Aug
dust210–130.0411%25 Aug
cache8–13-0.0311%25 Aug
dust213–80.018%25 Aug
mirage13–20.0111%25 Aug
mirage7–13-0.026%21 Aug
cache13–11-0.019%20 Aug
dust212–12-0.0219%20 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0113%18 Aug
vertigo16–130.0718%17 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0110%16 Aug
inferno13–80.068%16 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0011%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.0915%16 Aug
cache13–70.0021%16 Aug
ancient16–140.0015%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0623%14 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0613%14 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0212%14 Aug
ancient16–14-0.018%13 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0411%12 Aug
ancient13–8-0.016%12 Aug
inferno13–9-0.068%12 Aug
mirage13–90.0213%12 Aug
nuke13–50.0210%12 Aug
anubis13–100.098%12 Aug
train8–13-0.0226%12 Aug
train13–6-0.0415%12 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0319%10 Aug
nuke13–80.0310%10 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0711%9 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0014%9 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0313%9 Aug
inferno13–10.0110%9 Aug
dust23–13-0.0317%9 Aug
ancient12–160.0214%9 Aug
nuke13–90.0815%9 Aug
dust213–9-0.0113%8 Aug
cache7–13-0.0412%8 Aug
dust213–5-0.0015%8 Aug
anubis5–130.0517%8 Aug
ancient3–130.0217%8 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0417%8 Aug
inferno13–110.0213%8 Aug
cache7–130.016%8 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0410%8 Aug
dust212–12-0.0310%7 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0316%7 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0112%7 Aug
dust211–13-0.0410%6 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0717%6 Aug
dust213–80.0120%6 Aug
nuke12–12-0.027%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0519%6 Aug
cache13–10.0610%6 Aug
nuke7–130.0112%5 Aug
ancient13–40.0512%5 Aug
mirage13–80.0114%4 Aug
dust213–11-0.085%4 Aug
inferno13–90.029%3 Aug
nuke13–7-0.069%3 Aug
mirage10–130.0717%3 Aug
cache8–13-0.019%3 Aug
cache13–7-0.0213%2 Aug
nuke5–2-0.0267%2 Aug
dust212–12-0.035%2 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0211%2 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0110%1 Aug
dust25–13-0.046%1 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0614%1 Aug
mirage10–130.0613%1 Aug
inferno13–2-0.089%1 Aug
cache3–13-0.076%1 Aug
dust213–4-0.0513%1 Aug
cache5–130.0113%30 Jul
vertigo13–100.1014%30 Jul
vertigo5–130.015%30 Jul
vertigo12–120.1411%30 Jul
cache13–100.0616%29 Jul
anubis13–4-0.1212%29 Jul
cache3–130.0127%27 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0212%27 Jul
dust22–13-0.0412%27 Jul
inferno11–130.0314%27 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0116%27 Jul
anubis7–13-0.069%27 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0014%27 Jul
dust213–7-0.0612%26 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0016%26 Jul
cache13–110.0611%26 Jul
mirage13–60.0218%25 Jul
nuke13–10-0.058%25 Jul
dust211–130.0018%25 Jul
anubis13–4-0.055%25 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0612%24 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0616%23 Jul
cache13–80.0010%23 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0410%23 Jul
nuke12–12-0.037%23 Jul
anubis9–13-0.038%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →