C0CUCKOCTPEJl — CS2 Stats

NE76561199488062525[U:1:1527796797]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,597Tracked matches63%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating8.0 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating21,639Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13937 of 47075 tracked

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning69

Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–45–6Last 10049%Win rateWLWWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.1

Aggression10.0

Utility7.0

Positioning6.9

Opening Duels7.0

Clutch4.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 51% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning6.9

Utility7.0

Mechanics8.7

Opening Duels7.0

Win Impact9.4

Composite 8.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time595ms−44ms

first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms

Headshot accuracy23.0%−1.2%

first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — ancient 8–13

13–0Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 7dust2Weakest map · 42% over 26

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	32	17–15	53%	0.03
dust2	C	26	11–15	42%	0.03
ancient	B	15	7–8	47%	0.04
nuke	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	0.02
inferno	—	4	3–1	75%	-0.01
cache	—	3	1–2	33%	0.00
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.10
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,161Matches

50%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

82.1ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	420	50%	1.05	16.2
Dust2	308	54%	1.07	16.7
Ancient	156	51%	1.03	16.8
Anubis	84	42%	0.97	15.3
Nuke	82	50%	0.97	16.3
Inferno	52	52%	1.03	15.3
Overpass	38	42%	0.92	15.5
Cache	13	54%	0.99	15.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy

36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.1%Spray accuracy

89.3%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

587msReaction time

50.5%T opening success

65.6%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

15.2%Flash assists

7.41HE damage / grenade

17.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–6	0.01	29%	26 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	13%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	28%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.02	15%	26 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.03	19%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.05	20%	26 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	21%	26 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.04	14%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.10	22%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.04	28%	25 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	27%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.06	14%	25 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	18%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.07	33%	25 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.07	17%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	29%	24 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.01	35%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	22%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.12	22%	24 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.00	26%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.06	13%	24 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	22%	24 Aug →
dust2	21–25	0.04	26%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.13	22%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.13	28%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.11	35%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.06	15%	23 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	26%	23 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	20%	23 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.01	25%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	25%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.00	28%	22 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	25%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	20%	22 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	9%	22 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.04	21%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.14	31%	22 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.03	17%	21 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.13	36%	21 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	38%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.04	28%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.11	44%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.10	35%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	50%	21 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	27%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	20%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	16%	20 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	24%	20 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	20%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.04	22%	20 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	31%	20 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	19%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.00	29%	20 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.00	30%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	23%	20 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	39%	20 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.02	21%	19 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.02	26%	19 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.08	0%	19 Aug →
eldorado	1–9	-0.05	22%	19 Aug →
debris	9–7	0.01	27%	19 Aug →
poseidon	9–5	0.10	32%	19 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.01	23%	19 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	22%	19 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	15%	18 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.09	38%	18 Aug →
train	10–13	0.04	38%	18 Aug →
mirage	11–3	0.11	16%	18 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.11	23%	18 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.07	27%	18 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.11	6%	18 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.07	24%	18 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.02	39%	17 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.24	27%	17 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	28%	17 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	25%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	29%	17 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.00	22%	17 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	33%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	32%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.09	18%	16 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.10	21%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.08	17%	16 Aug →
anubis	16–13	-0.02	14%	16 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	15%	16 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	33%	16 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	17%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.04	13%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	21%	16 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	50%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	10%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.14	46%	15 Aug →
nuke	17–19	0.01	15%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	29%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.03	33%	15 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	35%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	17%	14 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.01	31%	14 Aug →