BillyBob — CS2 Stats

76561199483000346[U:1:1522734618]

1,708Tracked matches60%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,024Purple band · top ~16.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11928 of 22569 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning58

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–43–7Last 10050%Win rateWWLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.3

Aggression6.6

Utility5.0

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels1.6

Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning5.8

Utility5.0

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time582ms−64ms

first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms

Headshot accuracy17.2%+1.1%

first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.31Best rating — vertigo 9–1

13–2Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 12infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	20	8–12	40%	0.01
nuke	B	13	7–6	54%	0.01
poseidon	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.02
dust2	S	12	8–4	67%	0.01
anubis	A	11	7–4	64%	0.05
cache	A	11	6–5	55%	0.03
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	0.02
vertigo	S	6	4–2	67%	0.05
inferno	D	5	1–4	20%	0.03
debris	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.15
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

153Matches

48%Win rate

1.26Avg K/D

86.5ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win

32%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	38	55%	1.21	15.5
Ancient	28	46%	1.24	18.5
Mirage	22	36%	1.28	16.5
Nuke	17	82%	1.48	16.2
Train	15	53%	1.36	18.2
Inferno	11	18%	0.88	15.4
Dust2	11	27%	1.01	13.4
Cache	10	50%	1.65	18.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy

35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.1%Spray accuracy

83.3%Counter-strafing

10.0°Preaim

603msReaction time

22.8%T opening success

49.9%CT opening success

0.44Enemies flashed / flash

5.9%Flash assists

9.64HE damage / grenade

9.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4412 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.8068% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–6	0.03	28%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.11	19%	25 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.02	32%	25 Aug →
inferno	1–9	0.00	6%	25 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	11%	23 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	18%	23 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.04	19%	23 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	15%	23 Aug →
anubis	16–12	-0.02	15%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	18%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	21%	21 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.00	9%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	13%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.06	20%	17 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	11%	17 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	11%	17 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.09	21%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.01	16%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.10	16%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	28%	16 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.05	24%	16 Aug →
poseidon	4–9	-0.34	0%	16 Aug →
debris	8–8	-0.05	19%	16 Aug →
poseidon	9–7	0.01	24%	15 Aug →
eldorado	3–9	-0.08	21%	15 Aug →
poseidon	9–6	0.13	25%	15 Aug →
poseidon	7–9	0.04	21%	15 Aug →
poseidon	6–9	-0.20	5%	15 Aug →
poseidon	9–3	0.16	27%	15 Aug →
poseidon	5–9	-0.07	14%	15 Aug →
poseidon	9–1	0.05	22%	15 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.08	5%	15 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.00	13%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.13	27%	14 Aug →
poseidon	0–9	-0.20	29%	9 Aug →
poseidon	9–4	0.13	30%	9 Aug →
vertigo	9–1	0.31	29%	9 Aug →
inferno	8–8	0.08	27%	9 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.08	13%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	21%	9 Aug →
poseidon	7–9	0.03	10%	8 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.01	19%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	5%	7 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.10	21%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.03	6%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	11%	7 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.01	16%	7 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.06	4%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	27%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.11	18%	6 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	14%	6 Aug →
vertigo	6–3	-0.01	16%	6 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.05	17%	5 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.05	15%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.04	16%	5 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.11	31%	4 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	6%	4 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.07	18%	4 Aug →
vertigo	9–2	0.07	28%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.14	20%	2 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	21%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	19%	2 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.07	38%	2 Aug →
poseidon	6–9	-0.06	20%	1 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.06	17%	1 Aug →
poseidon	9–2	0.11	40%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.08	15%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	18%	1 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	46%	1 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.01	12%	1 Aug →
vertigo	2–9	-0.16	14%	1 Aug →
debris	0–9	-0.26	0%	1 Aug →
vertigo	8–8	0.07	7%	1 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.07	14%	31 Jul →
ancient	12–12	0.07	14%	31 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	16%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.04	8%	30 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	18%	29 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.03	5%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	17%	29 Jul →
cache	5–10	0.07	18%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–16	0.01	11%	28 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.01	13%	28 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	22%	26 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.15	18%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.12	19%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.01	18%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.12	24%	26 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.04	20%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	23%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	16%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	24%	24 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.14	13%	24 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.01	12%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	9%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.03	22%	23 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.07	21%	23 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	20%	23 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.05	17%	23 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.04	3%	22 Jul →