BLU∆

BLU∆ — CS2 Stats

CK76561199475031197[U:1:1514765469]Steam profile ↗

1,260Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 Developing
Premier CS Rating3,775Grey band · top ~84% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4044 of 5308 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

3,775Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 3,775
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 1,225 to go

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBLU∆FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER3,775 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning47
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateLLLWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2
Aggression7.4
Utility4.5
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 698ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.7
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact7.4

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time707ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 747ms → last ⅓ avg 707ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 13–8
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 30% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%0.01
dust2D2061430%-0.02
infernoB189950%-0.00
nukeB126650%-0.01
cacheB63350%-0.02
ancientS64267%-0.01
anubisA53260%-0.02
overpassA53260%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

54Matches
44%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
72.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21164%1.0714.2
Inferno1127%0.9512.9
Mirage1030%1.0416.9
Ancient667%0.7215.5
Nuke633%0.719.2
Anubis580%0.8912.4
Overpass250%0.8814.5
Cache20%0.619.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
698msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
55.3%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
6.38HE damage / grenade
9.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4833 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7179% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–13-0.0112%28 Aug
dust25–13-0.0817%28 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0425%27 Aug
cache13–11-0.0314%24 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0427%23 Aug
dust213–5-0.0019%23 Aug
inferno13–100.0115%23 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0317%23 Aug
mirage13–10.1021%18 Aug
nuke12–160.0115%18 Aug
dust215–150.0013%18 Aug
dust213–110.0116%17 Aug
dust28–13-0.0310%14 Aug
dust213–6-0.0716%14 Aug
mirage13–110.0519%13 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0229%13 Aug
mirage9–130.0219%13 Aug
mirage13–100.0523%13 Aug
mirage6–130.0140%13 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0215%11 Aug
dust26–13-0.054%11 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0320%11 Aug
mirage5–130.0211%11 Aug
anubis13–60.0118%11 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0326%11 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0726%11 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0317%10 Aug
nuke13–100.0120%8 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0623%6 Aug
dust215–150.0138%6 Aug
dust25–13-0.0220%5 Aug
anubis8–13-0.160%2 Aug
mirage13–80.1130%1 Aug
mirage11–130.0420%30 Jul
nuke13–40.0821%29 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0339%19 Jul
cache10–13-0.0627%4 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0735%27 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0112%24 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0626%11 Jun
nuke4–130.0216%9 Jun
inferno8–20.0112%9 Jun
mirage13–20.0328%4 Jun
dust213–9-0.0317%4 Jun
dust27–130.0421%3 Jun
dust26–13-0.0717%28 May
inferno13–70.0220%28 May
dust27–13-0.0114%25 May
inferno16–120.0519%23 May
inferno9–130.0125%21 May
mirage8–13-0.0319%21 May
mirage13–110.0212%19 May
mirage16–140.0110%18 May
nuke13–40.0323%18 May
ancient13–60.0118%18 May
ancient16–13-0.0517%17 May
inferno8–13-0.0516%17 May
mirage13–110.0710%15 May
inferno1–13-0.035%15 May
anubis13–80.0320%15 May
mirage20–22-0.026%14 May
mirage7–13-0.067%13 May
ancient13–100.0319%13 May
inferno9–130.0614%13 May
mirage13–10-0.0017%13 May
nuke16–120.0023%13 May
overpass13–4-0.0317%13 May
dust24–5-0.0325%10 May
inferno8–13-0.0316%4 May
cache13–100.0711%2 May
cache5–13-0.0713%30 Apr
cache13–40.0015%30 Apr
overpass8–130.0029%28 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0616%28 Apr
mirage13–70.0015%27 Apr
inferno13–4-0.0026%26 Apr
ancient5–13-0.037%26 Apr
dust214–16-0.0413%26 Apr
inferno13–50.0418%26 Apr
dust215–15-0.0424%26 Apr
mirage11–130.0128%26 Apr
overpass7–130.0020%26 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0123%26 Apr
anubis13–100.0819%25 Apr
overpass13–40.0729%24 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0114%23 Apr
mirage11–130.0018%22 Apr
dust213–70.0614%22 Apr
nuke6–130.0026%22 Apr
dust27–13-0.0016%22 Apr
mirage5–13-0.110%21 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0116%21 Apr
dust213–30.0210%20 Apr
mirage13–80.0614%20 Apr
overpass13–11-0.019%20 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0516%20 Apr
dust28–13-0.0222%20 Apr
inferno11–130.0512%19 Apr
inferno13–60.0314%19 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0521%19 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →