Slack1e — CS2 Stats

76561199473022161[U:1:1512756433]✓ No bans

1,812Tracked matches40%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,721Purple band · top ~25.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15332 of 25175 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,239 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSlack1eFACEITLevel 7 · 1,239 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,721 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning48
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateLWLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression4.1
Utility4.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.8
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time581ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — ancient 13–5
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC23101343%0.01
mirageC156940%0.01
ancientA149564%0.03
nukeA138562%0.01
dust2B105550%0.02
cacheD82625%-0.02
overpassS86275%0.01
anubisD51420%-0.00
office2020%-0.05
vertigo1010%0.05
train1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

974Matches
48%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
78.6ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage21251%1.0416.3
Dust221145%1.0316.3
Inferno17448%1.1016.3
Nuke11457%1.1516.6
Anubis9741%0.9615.0
Ancient8445%1.0116.6
Overpass3949%1.1516.9
Cache3253%1.2217.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
579msReaction time
25.5%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
5.99HE damage / grenade
7.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4099 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.5099% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.076%28 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0221%26 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0122%26 Aug
ancient13–30.1016%26 Aug
mirage6–130.0932%26 Aug
ancient11–130.0431%25 Aug
mirage7–10.0567%25 Aug
nuke13–80.0121%24 Aug
dust214–160.0324%21 Aug
ancient13–80.0522%18 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0015%16 Aug
mirage7–130.0224%16 Aug
mirage16–120.0324%16 Aug
nuke7–130.0413%15 Aug
inferno11–130.0426%15 Aug
mirage13–50.0214%15 Aug
inferno13–60.0327%15 Aug
dust211–130.0413%14 Aug
cache10–130.0218%12 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0123%12 Aug
inferno11–130.0222%12 Aug
inferno11–130.0026%12 Aug
cache13–100.0035%10 Aug
dust213–9-0.0517%9 Aug
nuke1–6-0.0650%9 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0028%6 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0735%5 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0128%3 Aug
cache2–13-0.0719%2 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0314%29 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0624%27 Jul
vertigo5–90.0543%27 Jul
mirage9–130.0417%27 Jul
mirage1–130.0114%25 Jul
ancient13–10.0042%25 Jul
inferno3–130.0536%22 Jul
cache11–7-0.0733%21 Jul
nuke13–40.0930%21 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0830%21 Jul
mirage13–30.0216%17 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0324%16 Jul
cache11–13-0.0021%16 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0236%14 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0521%14 Jul
office5–13-0.0641%13 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0231%12 Jul
cache3–13-0.0723%12 Jul
mirage13–100.0124%12 Jul
dust210–13-0.0216%11 Jul
dust213–30.0128%11 Jul
dust213–10-0.0125%10 Jul
nuke9–40.1218%6 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0021%4 Jul
overpass5–13-0.0317%2 Jul
overpass13–110.0817%1 Jul
mirage13–00.0919%1 Jul
cache5–90.0643%28 Jun
office4–13-0.0353%28 Jun
train8–130.0026%28 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0121%27 Jun
anubis11–130.0925%27 Jun
dust28–130.0330%27 Jun
dust213–40.0819%27 Jun
nuke13–30.0033%26 Jun
inferno13–80.0227%23 Jun
inferno1–50.0722%19 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0524%18 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0138%17 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0216%13 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0314%12 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0616%10 Jun
inferno13–70.0133%10 Jun
ancient13–50.1123%8 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0533%8 Jun
inferno13–90.0820%6 Jun
overpass13–10.0729%6 Jun
nuke13–30.0333%6 Jun
dust24–130.0044%6 Jun
overpass19–160.0116%6 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0124%6 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0816%28 May
overpass13–8-0.0126%28 May
dust213–90.0519%26 May
ancient13–50.1337%26 May
ancient13–100.0947%26 May
overpass13–11-0.0619%25 May
overpass13–70.0420%25 May
ancient9–13-0.0025%25 May
inferno15–150.0326%24 May
mirage9–13-0.0121%24 May
ancient13–100.0224%24 May
ancient17–190.0221%23 May
inferno8–80.0224%19 May
inferno9–30.1019%19 May
nuke9–40.0431%19 May
nuke5–13-0.0421%18 May
cache7–13-0.0024%17 May
inferno5–9-0.1328%16 May
anubis13–5-0.0421%15 May
inferno9–60.1120%15 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →