Meczyyy — CS2 Stats

76561199466114255[U:1:1505848527]

324Tracked matches63%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating22,002Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8079 of 26996 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMeczyyyPREMIER22,002 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning44
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY65305Last 10065%Win rateWLWTWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim9.2
Aggression2.2
Utility4.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch10.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 48 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning4.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact9.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time578ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+5.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 10–1
131Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
113In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 86% over 22dust2Weakest map · 43% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C23101343%0.00
mirageS2219386%0.01
infernoS1410471%0.00
nukeS1410471%0.01
cacheS128467%0.00
ancientS65183%-0.01
anubisB63350%-0.04
vertigo2020%-0.04
overpass1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7Matches
29%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
69.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2250%1.1015.5
Nuke250%0.6813.0
Mirage10%1.1120.0
Ancient10%0.7213.0
Inferno10%0.479.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
6.3°Preaim
575msReaction time
16.0%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
13.02HE damage / grenade
3.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4839 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.0348% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–50.1434%20 Jun
dust24–13-0.0342%20 Jun
mirage10–10.1624%20 Jun
mirage12–120.0020%20 Jun
inferno13–90.0114%20 Jun
dust213–70.0827%20 Jun
cache13–110.0825%19 Jun
dust29–13-0.0620%19 Jun
dust26–130.0138%19 Jun
dust27–13-0.0611%19 Jun
dust213–70.0530%19 Jun
inferno13–110.0523%18 Jun
cache13–80.0716%18 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0019%18 Jun
mirage13–40.0126%18 Jun
inferno10–13-0.036%17 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0213%17 Jun
dust212–12-0.0324%17 Jun
dust28–13-0.0723%17 Jun
mirage13–90.0627%16 Jun
dust213–50.0341%16 Jun
mirage12–120.0718%16 Jun
dust27–13-0.0323%16 Jun
nuke13–50.0627%15 Jun
dust28–13-0.0321%15 Jun
cache13–90.0239%15 Jun
cache13–11-0.0223%15 Jun
inferno13–90.0232%14 Jun
dust211–13-0.0622%14 Jun
cache13–50.0430%14 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0231%13 Jun
cache12–12-0.0218%13 Jun
inferno13–70.0017%13 Jun
cache10–130.0119%13 Jun
cache13–9-0.0714%13 Jun
cache7–13-0.0119%13 Jun
cache13–10-0.0533%13 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0115%12 Jun
cache13–90.0015%12 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0115%12 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0719%12 Jun
nuke3–130.0115%12 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0222%11 Jun
nuke13–80.0526%11 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0138%11 Jun
inferno13–80.0332%11 Jun
inferno7–130.0131%10 Jun
dust213–90.0032%10 Jun
ancient16–130.0015%10 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0532%10 Jun
mirage13–70.1118%9 Jun
mirage13–70.0334%9 Jun
dust213–90.0435%6 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0434%6 Jun
cache8–13-0.0015%24 May
mirage13–6-0.0026%24 May
inferno13–50.0126%23 May
mirage13–8-0.057%23 May
inferno13–80.0426%10 May
mirage13–8-0.0216%10 May
mirage13–11-0.0415%8 May
overpass7–13-0.0416%7 May
nuke13–50.0312%7 May
mirage13–9-0.0613%25 Apr
inferno16–14-0.0513%22 Apr
nuke13–10-0.018%19 Apr
ancient4–13-0.1010%19 Apr
dust213–110.0924%19 Apr
nuke3–13-0.128%17 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.0120%8 Apr
vertigo9–13-0.0819%8 Apr
anubis13–6-0.0415%7 Apr
anubis5–13-0.1129%7 Apr
anubis13–1-0.0017%7 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0314%7 Apr
nuke13–100.0315%5 Apr
nuke13–3-0.0134%4 Apr
dust213–60.0820%4 Apr
nuke13–110.0918%4 Apr
nuke15–150.1426%4 Apr
mirage13–90.0126%4 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0211%3 Apr
dust211–13-0.0415%3 Apr
dust213–80.0620%3 Apr
mirage13–60.0129%3 Apr
dust213–11-0.047%31 Mar
mirage13–110.0223%31 Mar
dust213–110.0215%31 Mar
dust29–130.0424%31 Mar
mirage13–30.0716%31 Mar
anubis1–13-0.0410%30 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0223%30 Mar
mirage13–70.0725%30 Mar
anubis13–5-0.0117%29 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0417%29 Mar
inferno9–130.0214%29 Mar
dust29–13-0.0719%28 Mar
inferno13–70.0321%28 Mar
dust211–130.0318%28 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0626%27 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →