chump- — CS2 Stats

76561199438252598[U:1:1477986870]✓ No bans

1,105Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,082Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,036Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3915 of 11770 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,119 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGchump-FACEITLevel 7 · 1,119 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,036 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning47
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54433Last 10054%Win rateLLWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression5.0
Utility6.3
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch2.8

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.7
Utility6.3
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time563ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — inferno 9–1
131Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 79% over 14ancientWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26141254%0.01
dust2B157847%0.04
infernoC146843%0.02
nukeS1411379%0.02
cacheS139469%0.02
ancientD124833%0.00
anubisB63350%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

23,522Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
1,200Matches
46.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Pink band
52.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band
1.8%Shot accuracy
2,343MVPs
1,284Hours (in match)
1,134Bombs planted
409Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,823dust2
1,729inferno
1,229nuke
187train
32vertigo

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

483Matches
49%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
77.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14047%1.0714.9
Dust210949%1.1315.3
Ancient7148%1.0514.8
Inferno5855%1.3017.0
Nuke3951%1.2215.7
Anubis2446%1.1116.3
Overpass2157%1.1214.7
Cache1354%1.0313.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
88.2%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
561msReaction time
36.3%T opening success
29.3%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
8.08HE damage / grenade
14.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.3248% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0415%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0521%25 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0013%25 Aug
ancient13–60.0419%23 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0817%20 Aug
ancient13–50.0117%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0115%19 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0211%19 Aug
dust213–30.0319%18 Aug
mirage13–70.0723%16 Aug
nuke13–60.0417%16 Aug
inferno9–130.0014%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0714%16 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0522%16 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0116%11 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0021%10 Aug
inferno13–8-0.008%9 Aug
ancient7–130.0110%9 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0312%9 Aug
dust222–180.0313%9 Aug
mirage11–130.0422%8 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0416%8 Aug
anubis11–130.0220%8 Aug
dust213–50.1021%7 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0222%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0227%2 Aug
cache16–14-0.0218%2 Aug
nuke13–70.0526%2 Aug
dust27–130.0339%2 Aug
mirage14–160.0323%1 Aug
dust29–130.0324%1 Aug
dust213–60.0822%1 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0122%1 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0027%1 Aug
mirage13–70.1222%31 Jul
inferno15–150.0415%31 Jul
inferno13–10.0623%31 Jul
anubis16–130.0122%30 Jul
cache11–130.0120%30 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0325%29 Jul
cache16–120.0117%29 Jul
nuke13–90.0624%27 Jul
nuke16–130.0424%27 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0225%26 Jul
anubis9–130.0114%26 Jul
inferno13–80.1320%24 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0511%24 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0112%24 Jul
mirage13–90.0221%24 Jul
dust27–13-0.0319%23 Jul
cache11–13-0.0420%22 Jul
mirage13–10.0927%22 Jul
mirage16–140.0020%22 Jul
ancient13–40.0721%21 Jul
cache13–80.0513%21 Jul
ancient13–110.0115%21 Jul
cache3–13-0.0630%21 Jul
anubis13–110.0219%19 Jul
cache13–70.0222%19 Jul
dust213–100.0519%19 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0619%18 Jul
cache13–100.0219%14 Jul
inferno13–4-0.028%12 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0018%12 Jul
cache7–13-0.0229%12 Jul
mirage13–60.0011%12 Jul
dust216–120.0328%12 Jul
nuke13–60.1025%12 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0114%11 Jul
nuke13–40.1015%11 Jul
mirage13–30.1122%11 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0718%11 Jul
cache13–100.0325%11 Jul
cache13–70.0431%11 Jul
cache16–130.0919%11 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0437%11 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0411%11 Jul
mirage5–130.018%5 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0026%5 Jul
mirage10–130.0519%5 Jul
cache13–30.1725%5 Jul
nuke9–60.0319%5 Jul
inferno9–10.2757%5 Jul
dust210–130.0211%4 Jul
dust26–130.2519%4 Jul
mirage13–70.0911%4 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0230%4 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0418%4 Jul
nuke11–130.0027%4 Jul
nuke13–80.0137%3 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0013%3 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0520%3 Jul
dust213–80.0238%3 Jul
inferno6–130.0310%3 Jul
nuke13–70.0423%3 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0019%3 Jul
dust215–150.0020%2 Jul
ancient7–130.0118%2 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0424%2 Jul
mirage15–150.0024%2 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →