LigmaSigma

LigmaSigma — CS2 Stats

76561199433312598[U:1:1473046870]Steam profile ↗

218Tracked matches27%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLigmaSigmaFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning54
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5248Last 10052%Win rateLLLLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression6.2
Utility6.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch2.2

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.08
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time623ms+37ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — ancient 16–3
162Biggest win — dust2
11Longest win streak
L7Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
59Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 89% over 9nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35171849%-0.01
infernoC2181338%-0.04
dust2A127558%0.00
ancientS98189%0.04
overpassS86275%0.04
anubisB63350%0.01
nukeD51420%-0.06
vertigo32167%-0.00
train1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

230Matches
54%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
65.0ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
5%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3639%0.8313.7
Inferno2861%0.8913.8
Anubis2425%0.8213.0
Dust22035%0.6711.3
Ancient2045%0.7512.1
Nuke633%0.9616.0
Vertigo580%0.8512.6
Train10%1.3225.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
90.1%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
621msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
7.30HE damage / grenade
8.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6509% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–130.0035%4 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0627%24 Jan
dust29–13-0.0331%9 Jan
train11–130.0128%8 Jan
anubis13–16-0.0332%8 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0230%21 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0316%12 Dec
vertigo13–80.0223%12 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0620%11 Dec
mirage15–19-0.0229%28 Nov
mirage4–13-0.0324%13 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0516%6 Nov
mirage13–90.0124%31 Oct
mirage10–130.0237%30 Oct
mirage6–13-0.0133%30 Oct
mirage3–13-0.0617%30 Oct
mirage13–90.0116%23 Oct
inferno3–13-0.0712%17 Oct
ancient13–40.028%17 Oct
mirage13–9-0.0320%17 Oct
dust24–13-0.1311%16 Oct
anubis10–13-0.0317%15 Oct
nuke20–220.0126%15 Oct
mirage8–13-0.0710%11 Oct
mirage13–50.1029%11 Oct
dust28–13-0.0324%11 Oct
mirage13–11-0.0424%11 Oct
nuke13–16-0.0725%8 Oct
anubis7–13-0.1128%8 Oct
inferno13–11-0.0316%8 Oct
dust213–4-0.0538%8 Oct
dust28–13-0.0415%8 Oct
nuke8–13-0.1018%8 Oct
mirage15–19-0.0317%8 Oct
mirage8–13-0.0614%8 Oct
inferno4–13-0.1029%8 Oct
mirage15–19-0.0532%25 Aug
anubis13–60.1227%22 Aug
dust213–60.0218%22 Aug
mirage13–100.0428%15 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0021%13 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0218%25 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0024%7 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0122%6 Jul
dust28–13-0.114%19 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0215%19 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0638%20 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0333%15 Jun
nuke4–16-0.1133%19 May
inferno9–16-0.0720%18 May
inferno20–22-0.0525%15 May
inferno16–7-0.0548%12 May
overpass16–140.0223%11 May
mirage16–10-0.0427%9 May
inferno16–6-0.0213%9 May
inferno8–16-0.1019%7 May
inferno9–16-0.045%5 May
overpass16–12-0.0317%3 May
mirage14–16-0.0215%3 May
mirage16–12-0.0431%23 Apr
mirage6–16-0.0636%23 Apr
inferno9–16-0.0422%1 Apr
inferno16–5-0.0324%1 Apr
inferno16–11-0.0318%1 Apr
vertigo12–16-0.0820%1 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0118%1 Apr
mirage3–16-0.1127%11 Mar
mirage16–100.0020%8 Mar
mirage8–16-0.0617%7 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0114%7 Mar
inferno16–14-0.0222%7 Mar
ancient16–100.0530%17 Feb
anubis10–20.0817%17 Feb
mirage16–9-0.0123%17 Feb
mirage16–130.1116%16 Feb
mirage16–100.0221%16 Feb
anubis16–60.0521%16 Feb
mirage16–90.0415%16 Feb
overpass14–160.0019%16 Feb
mirage11–160.0331%16 Feb
dust216–2-0.0320%16 Feb
vertigo16–140.0519%15 Feb
overpass16–130.0319%15 Feb
overpass16–110.1030%12 Feb
dust216–20.1223%12 Feb
mirage16–40.0337%12 Feb
inferno13–160.0515%12 Feb
inferno11–16-0.0117%12 Feb
overpass16–80.0929%11 Feb
ancient16–50.0737%11 Feb
inferno16–80.0426%11 Feb
ancient16–130.0216%11 Feb
ancient16–140.0430%10 Feb
ancient16–30.2026%10 Feb
overpass16–50.0921%10 Feb
dust216–80.1522%10 Feb
mirage16–120.0014%10 Feb
dust216–40.0920%10 Feb
dust216–90.1126%10 Feb
overpass8–160.0215%9 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →