BLΞSSED †

BLΞSSED † — CS2 Stats

US76561199410414332[U:1:1450148604]Steam profile ↗

2,391Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,389Purple band · top ~18.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24778 of 48109 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,000 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBLΞSSED †FACEITLevel 4 · 1,000 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,389 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning49
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY464212Last 10046%Win rateWLLWTWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression7.1
Utility6.4
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.9
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time556ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–2
132Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
63In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 14infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC1761135%0.01
nukeC145936%0.00
ancientS1410471%0.01
mirageA117464%0.01
dust2A106460%0.01
anubisC94544%-0.00
vertigoS75271%0.01
infernoD72529%0.02
train4040%0.02
overpass31233%0.08
office3030%-0.03
italy1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

30Matches
53%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
89.1ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
39%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage933%1.3317.2
Vertigo650%1.0517.2
Inferno650%1.2014.5
Ancient450%0.9413.0
Dust23100%1.2022.3
Nuke1100%1.0016.0
Overpass1100%1.3320.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
75.0%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
559msReaction time
44.9%T opening success
31.9%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
10.82HE damage / grenade
13.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 31.8663% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–10.0215%30 Aug
italy8–130.0026%27 Aug
dust29–13-0.0024%26 Aug
cache13–5-0.074%26 Aug
cache12–12-0.0117%26 Aug
mirage13–110.0522%25 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0224%24 Aug
dust21–100.0331%24 Aug
dust213–110.1117%23 Aug
nuke5–130.0321%23 Aug
cache9–130.0713%22 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0410%20 Aug
ancient13–90.0020%20 Aug
dust212–12-0.0524%19 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0013%17 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0424%17 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0010%17 Aug
inferno13–80.0218%17 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0435%16 Aug
dust213–80.0213%16 Aug
dust213–60.009%16 Aug
train8–130.0730%13 Aug
train2–13-0.0528%13 Aug
mirage10–130.0417%12 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0620%12 Aug
train11–130.0616%12 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0328%11 Aug
nuke4–130.0725%11 Aug
vertigo5–90.0116%10 Aug
nuke10–13-0.008%4 Aug
nuke13–110.0031%2 Aug
anubis15–150.0116%1 Aug
dust213–9-0.0021%1 Aug
nuke13–40.0319%30 Jul
vertigo13–11-0.0321%30 Jul
vertigo0–6-0.0621%30 Jul
vertigo13–100.0025%29 Jul
anubis13–50.0022%28 Jul
anubis13–50.0214%28 Jul
cache13–20.0710%20 Jul
vertigo9–40.0721%20 Jul
nuke8–8-0.109%20 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0117%20 Jul
inferno13–70.0331%20 Jul
cache13–50.0624%20 Jul
mirage13–20.1625%19 Jul
inferno9–130.0531%19 Jul
dust213–8-0.0116%19 Jul
overpass13–40.1216%19 Jul
inferno8–8-0.069%16 Jul
nuke13–50.060%16 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0219%16 Jul
vertigo13–110.1019%16 Jul
cache6–13-0.0014%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0211%14 Jul
ancient13–100.1214%13 Jul
inferno10–130.0413%13 Jul
ancient13–100.0215%13 Jul
cache12–160.1110%13 Jul
dust28–13-0.0216%13 Jul
ancient13–70.0621%12 Jul
train6–13-0.0127%12 Jul
cache7–130.0118%10 Jul
dust213–100.0415%10 Jul
cache5–13-0.0614%10 Jul
cache8–13-0.0118%10 Jul
nuke13–60.0436%10 Jul
mirage16–130.0216%10 Jul
cache13–70.0526%9 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0315%9 Jul
cache6–130.0113%9 Jul
office6–13-0.0812%9 Jul
office5–13-0.0319%9 Jul
anubis13–90.1523%9 Jul
cache13–50.0714%8 Jul
office11–130.0119%8 Jul
inferno8–80.1117%7 Jul
nuke10–130.0217%7 Jul
ancient6–130.0221%6 Jul
ancient10–13-0.048%4 Jul
ancient13–70.0317%4 Jul
cache12–12-0.0422%2 Jul
overpass8–80.1019%2 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0212%1 Jul
ancient13–6-0.117%1 Jul
cache12–120.0331%1 Jul
anubis9–4-0.0816%30 Jun
ancient13–50.0014%30 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0412%30 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0318%29 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0213%29 Jun
cache6–13-0.0935%29 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0111%29 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0311%28 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0713%26 Jun
ancient4–130.0427%26 Jun
mirage13–100.0024%26 Jun
overpass6–130.0318%25 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0221%22 Jun
ancient15–150.0316%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →