trainspotting — CS2 Stats

76561199346875364[U:1:1386609636]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

533Tracked matches60%Win rate2026Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,858Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning58

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–41–2Last 10057%Win rateLLLWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.08 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression7.1

Utility5.1

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels4.1

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning5.8

Utility5.1

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time504ms−101ms

first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms

Headshot accuracy16.5%−3.2%

first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — nuke 13–1

13–0Biggest win — ancient

10Longest win streak

L3Current streak

4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 100% over 5mirageWeakest map · 38% over 24

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	24	9–15	38%	-0.00
dust2	A	20	12–8	60%	-0.00
ancient	A	18	10–8	56%	0.01
inferno	S	13	9–4	69%	0.03
cache	C	7	3–4	43%	0.02
train	S	5	5–0	100%	0.05
anubis	—	4	3–1	75%	0.07
nuke	—	3	3–0	100%	0.09
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.17
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03
office	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy

40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.3%Spray accuracy

84.1%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

576msReaction time

36.4%T opening success

56.5%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

9.1%Flash assists

8.65HE damage / grenade

6.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4509 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.3969% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	0–2	-0.01	0%	21 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.16	0%	21 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.05	24%	20 Jul →
train	13–9	0.03	31%	20 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	32%	20 Jul →
train	13–6	0.03	14%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	15%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	34%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.06	19%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.02	34%	19 Jul →
train	13–3	0.14	15%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.13	32%	19 Jul →
train	13–9	0.05	12%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.10	20%	19 Jul →
shelter	13–6	0.17	25%	19 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	13%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.15	17%	19 Jul →
train	13–10	0.00	15%	19 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.04	15%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.04	19%	19 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	0.01	17%	19 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.00	23%	19 Jul →
mirage	0–13	0.00	0%	19 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.02	14%	19 Jul →
fachwerk	10–13	0.03	3%	18 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.09	20%	18 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.09	16%	18 Jul →
vertigo	2–13	-0.06	3%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.07	4%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.05	23%	18 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.12	33%	18 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.02	0%	18 Jul →
dust2	11–0	-0.11	0%	18 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.00	24%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.12	36%	18 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.08	0%	18 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.03	50%	18 Jul →
ancient	5–1	0.02	38%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	54%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.06	22%	18 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	27%	18 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.08	11%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.03	18%	18 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.02	27%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.13	17%	18 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.10	30%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	19%	17 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	26%	17 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.05	19%	17 Jul →
office	13–11	-0.01	21%	17 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.17	15%	17 Jul →
dust2	6–1	0.13	25%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.10	18%	17 Jul →
dust2	6–3	0.05	24%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.09	25%	17 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	12%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–0	-0.06	14%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.24	42%	17 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	27%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.06	17%	17 Jul →
mirage	3–0	0.01	33%	17 Jul →
mirage	3–9	-0.01	17%	17 Jul →
ancient	0–2	-0.02	50%	17 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.02	20%	17 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.06	17%	16 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	23%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.02	11%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	16%	16 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.07	26%	16 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	23%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	15%	16 Jul →
mirage	0–5	-0.04	0%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	13%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.04	19%	16 Jul →
ancient	10–1	0.01	5%	16 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	15%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–0	-0.01	33%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.04	16%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.07	5%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.03	23%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	18%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.02	25%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–0	0.09	21%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.02	21%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.01	5%	16 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	18%	15 Jul →
inferno	12–3	0.02	24%	15 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	15%	15 Jul →
poseidon	6–9	0.04	22%	15 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.03	23%	15 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.07	21%	15 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	15%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	29%	15 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.04	40%	15 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.08	25%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.00	34%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.03	24%	14 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.00	23%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–16	0.02	15%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.05	21%	14 Jul →