Metr1x — CS2 Stats

76561199275247452[U:1:1314981724]

3,440Tracked matches70%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,553Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2586 of 8369 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,777 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMetr1xFACEITLevel 8 · 1,777 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,553 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning64
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY64342Last 10064%Win rateWLWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1
Aggression9.9
Utility4.6
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning6.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time545ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%+4.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — nuke 9–0
130Biggest win — office
7Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 92% over 12officeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A159660%0.00
cacheS139469%0.01
mirageB136746%-0.00
nukeS1211192%0.07
infernoA106460%0.02
ancientS86275%-0.02
vertigoS87188%0.07
anubisS75271%-0.02
officeD62433%0.06
trainB63350%0.06
overpass1010%-0.11
warden1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

182Matches
55%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
81.9ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5058%1.2217.3
Inferno4360%1.1415.8
Dust21963%0.9713.6
Ancient1747%1.1016.6
Anubis1631%1.2417.3
Nuke1267%1.5021.3
Vertigo1250%1.1816.7
Train617%1.1021.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.7%Headshot accuracy
39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.3%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
531msReaction time
40.1%T opening success
57.9%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
8.10HE damage / grenade
7.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.492 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.1021%27 Aug
office7–130.0832%27 Aug
cache13–80.0624%27 Aug
inferno11–130.0313%22 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0123%22 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0621%17 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0426%17 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0421%17 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0313%15 Aug
ancient13–110.0125%15 Aug
cache13–6-0.0416%15 Aug
cache8–4-0.0542%15 Aug
mirage13–70.0821%15 Aug
office11–130.0827%15 Aug
train13–80.1423%15 Aug
train13–60.0723%14 Aug
inferno13–100.0625%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0118%4 Aug
train10–130.0447%4 Aug
dust213–30.2140%3 Aug
vertigo13–30.0629%3 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0027%3 Aug
vertigo13–100.0333%3 Aug
cache2–4-0.090%1 Aug
office9–130.1231%1 Aug
nuke13–50.0522%25 Jul
dust213–11-0.0016%25 Jul
anubis16–130.0419%19 Jul
vertigo13–60.1134%19 Jul
office13–70.0124%17 Jul
dust26–130.0127%12 Jul
cache13–10.1328%12 Jul
mirage3–130.0317%12 Jul
vertigo13–70.0016%12 Jul
cache7–13-0.063%12 Jul
dust214–160.0114%11 Jul
cache13–80.0320%11 Jul
office12–120.0218%11 Jul
office13–00.0216%11 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0213%11 Jul
anubis13–110.0315%10 Jul
inferno13–90.0415%10 Jul
mirage13–30.0115%9 Jul
dust210–130.0220%9 Jul
dust25–13-0.0323%9 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0414%7 Jul
cache13–60.0520%7 Jul
mirage11–130.0125%6 Jul
inferno11–130.0132%6 Jul
nuke13–20.1030%6 Jul
vertigo13–100.0816%6 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0219%5 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0812%5 Jul
overpass9–13-0.1127%2 Jul
mirage1–8-0.0820%2 Jul
nuke9–60.167%2 Jul
vertigo9–70.0817%2 Jul
dust26–130.0024%2 Jul
mirage13–40.0335%2 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0427%2 Jul
mirage5–130.0232%2 Jul
ancient1–13-0.120%1 Jul
inferno13–70.0115%1 Jul
cache13–100.0424%1 Jul
cache8–130.0617%1 Jul
cache13–11-0.0221%1 Jul
mirage11–10.0237%1 Jul
dust213–8-0.0434%30 Jun
dust213–7-0.0221%30 Jun
dust213–9-0.0123%30 Jun
ancient13–90.0518%30 Jun
warden4–130.0510%30 Jun
nuke12–16-0.0213%30 Jun
nuke13–40.0720%30 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0432%30 Jun
inferno13–90.0224%29 Jun
dust21–13-0.1016%28 Jun
ancient13–100.0117%28 Jun
nuke9–00.3024%28 Jun
inferno3–9-0.1320%28 Jun
inferno9–40.1427%28 Jun
nuke9–20.1311%28 Jun
nuke9–40.0330%28 Jun
vertigo3–130.0812%28 Jun
anubis13–5-0.067%26 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0321%26 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0521%24 Jun
dust213–30.0224%24 Jun
inferno13–60.0010%24 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0124%22 Jun
mirage13–70.0419%21 Jun
dust213–40.0517%21 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0215%20 Jun
cache12–120.0220%20 Jun
dust213–11-0.0623%20 Jun
train13–20.0015%19 Jun
train0–4-0.0220%19 Jun
train7–130.1222%18 Jun
vertigo13–40.1615%18 Jun
cache13–40.0624%18 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →