Tang3n — CS2 Stats

76561199236644019[U:1:1276378291]✓ No bans

589Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,799Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15229 of 43940 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,602 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTang3nFACEITLevel 10 · 1,602 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER20,799 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning47
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50491Last 10050%Win rateWLWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression6.4
Utility5.8
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch4.0

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 669ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.7
Utility5.8
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time658ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 673ms → last ⅓ avg 658ms
Headshot accuracy25.7%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–6
133Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
911In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 20nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC41182344%0.00
infernoS2013765%-0.01
anubisB168850%-0.03
nukeD62433%-0.02
dust2B63350%-0.01
ancient41325%-0.04
overpass43175%0.01
cache32167%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

465Matches
54%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
75.4ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17455%1.1116.1
Inferno10054%1.0715.2
Anubis6949%1.0415.3
Dust22129%0.9514.9
Nuke1856%0.9712.1
Ancient1145%0.9214.0
Cache1080%1.0716.6
Overpass757%0.8714.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
89.0%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
669msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
6.76HE damage / grenade
8.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2613% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno19–17-0.0326%29 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0315%20 Aug
inferno13–70.0516%7 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0639%6 Aug
anubis19–15-0.0617%18 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0928%13 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0515%2 Jul
mirage9–130.0019%2 Jul
cache13–8-0.0327%27 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0523%27 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0120%20 Jun
mirage11–130.0723%16 Jun
inferno13–110.0334%13 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0450%12 Jun
nuke4–130.0628%4 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0127%30 May
anubis16–140.0114%29 May
mirage10–13-0.1033%25 May
inferno13–10-0.038%24 May
mirage13–80.0442%23 May
mirage9–13-0.0632%21 May
mirage2–13-0.0650%21 May
mirage14–16-0.0120%14 May
mirage13–30.0213%13 May
inferno13–4-0.0031%3 May
cache13–30.0218%2 May
cache6–13-0.079%1 May
mirage14–16-0.0022%27 Apr
inferno13–110.0349%25 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0423%24 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0824%23 Apr
mirage9–130.0120%22 Apr
mirage13–30.0831%19 Apr
mirage13–70.0425%18 Apr
mirage13–60.0123%17 Apr
anubis16–130.0320%17 Apr
mirage3–13-0.050%11 Apr
mirage13–90.0128%6 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0123%4 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0417%21 Mar
anubis13–110.0222%21 Mar
inferno13–100.0515%18 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0229%12 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0414%10 Mar
mirage10–130.0229%8 Mar
mirage13–6-0.049%3 Mar
ancient1–13-0.0638%2 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0419%28 Feb
mirage13–70.0119%26 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0117%25 Feb
anubis13–50.0015%25 Feb
inferno10–00.0328%25 Feb
overpass15–15-0.0116%23 Feb
dust29–130.0431%22 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0430%22 Feb
dust213–30.0333%21 Feb
overpass13–40.0311%21 Feb
dust213–9-0.0416%21 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0318%21 Feb
inferno13–30.0123%20 Feb
ancient13–90.0231%19 Feb
mirage11–130.0310%19 Feb
mirage13–60.1227%18 Feb
mirage11–130.0130%17 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0233%16 Feb
mirage13–100.0722%15 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0221%14 Feb
dust26–13-0.047%14 Feb
mirage13–30.0422%12 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0222%12 Feb
inferno13–6-0.0122%12 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0036%12 Feb
mirage6–130.0221%12 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0617%10 Feb
inferno13–100.0418%10 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0614%10 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0126%8 Feb
dust213–70.0122%8 Feb
mirage13–70.0019%7 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0330%7 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0237%6 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0823%6 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0222%6 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0530%5 Feb
mirage13–110.0226%5 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0432%5 Feb
mirage13–30.0627%4 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0334%4 Feb
overpass13–80.0224%4 Feb
dust24–13-0.0432%4 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0532%4 Feb
mirage13–50.1028%3 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0526%2 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0632%2 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0417%2 Feb
nuke13–100.0223%2 Feb
mirage13–110.0522%2 Feb
overpass13–6-0.0129%1 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0814%1 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0616%1 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →