NeeQ

NeeQ — CS2 Stats

76561199232419718[U:1:1272153990]Steam profile ↗

944Tracked matches58%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,400 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNeeQFACEITLevel 7 · 1,400 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning44
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY464410Last 10046%Win rateLWLLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression5.5
Utility4.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact7.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time644ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy27.1%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 27.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — mirage 13–4
130Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 50% over 34dust2Weakest map · 41% over 32
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB34171750%-0.01
dust2C32131941%-0.01
ancientB147750%-0.03
nukeC73443%-0.01
cache42250%-0.00
anubis31233%-0.04
inferno21150%-0.03
debris110100%-0.01
vertigo1010%0.02
overpass110100%0.01
office1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 32). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

303Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
78.8ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8458%1.0916.4
Ancient5947%1.0315.5
Dust25246%0.8814.9
Nuke2343%0.9414.8
Anubis1527%0.9815.1
Inferno1486%1.0617.9
Vertigo1155%1.0716.0
Train50%0.7013.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.2%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
6.9°Preaim
653msReaction time
26.4%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
7.11HE damage / grenade
6.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.3888% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 32 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0523%11 Aug
cache13–90.0329%11 Aug
dust211–13-0.0415%9 Aug
mirage2–130.0229%9 Aug
dust216–140.0131%4 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0521%3 Aug
debris9–7-0.0141%3 Aug
nuke13–80.0428%2 Aug
dust28–2-0.0010%2 Aug
ancient13–40.0110%2 Aug
dust211–130.0127%2 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0038%2 Aug
ancient0–13-0.0825%2 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0133%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0537%14 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0448%8 Jul
mirage13–80.0221%8 Jul
nuke12–120.0031%8 Jul
cache2–13-0.058%28 Jun
dust213–6-0.0150%28 Jun
mirage13–110.0425%28 Jun
mirage12–120.0122%27 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0823%27 Jun
mirage13–50.0316%27 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0626%27 Jun
mirage12–120.0313%27 Jun
mirage10–3-0.0256%27 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0523%27 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0718%26 Jun
dust27–13-0.0133%26 Jun
dust213–20.0423%26 Jun
dust26–13-0.0333%26 Jun
dust26–13-0.0030%26 Jun
mirage13–20.0119%24 Jun
mirage13–100.0724%24 Jun
dust213–9-0.0124%23 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0924%19 Jun
dust23–13-0.0823%17 Jun
mirage13–50.1326%17 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0329%16 Jun
mirage4–00.0644%16 Jun
dust23–13-0.049%16 Jun
nuke13–80.0325%16 Jun
ancient13–60.0321%16 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0625%15 Jun
cache12–12-0.0126%15 Jun
dust210–13-0.0419%15 Jun
dust212–12-0.0329%14 Jun
anubis11–13-0.079%14 Jun
dust213–7-0.0436%6 Jun
mirage13–00.017%5 Jun
ancient4–13-0.045%5 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0314%28 May
inferno0–13-0.050%21 May
mirage13–110.0126%21 May
vertigo8–80.027%21 May
inferno13–11-0.009%21 May
cache13–10.0223%12 May
dust215–15-0.0411%11 May
mirage7–13-0.0333%11 May
dust215–15-0.0412%23 Apr
mirage11–13-0.059%23 Apr
nuke6–13-0.068%23 Apr
dust210–13-0.0315%23 Apr
overpass13–50.0115%18 Apr
ancient13–110.0118%12 Apr
mirage13–40.230%12 Apr
dust29–13-0.0917%12 Apr
dust213–50.0129%11 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0318%11 Apr
dust210–13-0.0338%9 Apr
dust213–6-0.0111%9 Apr
dust24–130.0214%9 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0520%9 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0317%7 Apr
dust213–9-0.0633%7 Apr
dust20–13-0.0733%5 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0625%5 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0144%4 Apr
mirage9–13-0.086%4 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0514%4 Apr
dust26–13-0.0324%29 Mar
dust213–40.0654%19 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0111%18 Mar
dust26–13-0.0333%18 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0615%18 Mar
ancient16–130.0419%15 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0215%11 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0126%11 Mar
dust213–110.0222%11 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0226%11 Mar
dust213–50.0134%11 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0426%26 Feb
mirage13–20.0829%25 Feb
nuke16–13-0.0116%25 Feb
office5–13-0.0532%20 Feb
dust213–40.0828%20 Feb
dust26–130.0825%20 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0735%20 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0820%15 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →