Olof𖣂 — CS2 Stats

SE76561198845738554[U:1:885472826]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

2,412Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating17,789Purple band · top ~17.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11316 of 20891 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,480 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning66

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateLWLWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.0

Aggression10.0

Utility5.6

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels6.9

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 49% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning6.6

Utility5.6

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels6.9

Win Impact3.3

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time565ms−57ms

first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms

Headshot accuracy26.5%−2.0%

first ⅓ avg 28.5% → last ⅓ avg 26.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — ancient 13–4

13–1Biggest win — cache

7Longest win streak

7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 17ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	43	23–20	53%	0.05
mirage	A	17	10–7	59%	0.02
ancient	D	11	3–8	27%	0.04
nuke	B	11	5–6	45%	0.01
cache	B	8	4–4	50%	0.05
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.04
vertigo	—	3	3–0	100%	0.07
anubis	—	2	2–0	100%	0.09
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

398Matches

52%Win rate

1.32Avg K/D

96.0ADR

53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

30%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	96	53%	1.37	18.3
Ancient	47	49%	1.38	20.9
Dust2	44	55%	1.46	19.8
Nuke	26	50%	1.52	19.6
Vertigo	16	50%	1.51	20.9
Anubis	14	57%	1.45	18.8
Overpass	6	50%	1.19	20.0
Inferno	6	67%	1.13	19.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.1%Headshot accuracy

39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.2%Spray accuracy

84.6%Counter-strafing

7.1°Preaim

572msReaction time

49.4%T opening success

65.8%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

8.4%Flash assists

7.34HE damage / grenade

8.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	3–13	-0.04	18%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	24%	28 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.08	36%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	24%	25 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	17%	25 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	31%	25 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	0.08	31%	24 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.06	26%	24 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.06	31%	24 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.07	21%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.09	29%	24 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.00	20%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.05	30%	24 Aug →
inferno	12–16	-0.01	25%	19 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	37%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	23%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	14%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.10	30%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.10	28%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.03	33%	17 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.08	31%	17 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	23%	16 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.01	21%	16 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.02	33%	16 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	19%	13 Aug →
mirage	2–6	-0.05	45%	13 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	13%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.08	27%	13 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.08	30%	13 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.05	26%	11 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.05	29%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	31%	11 Aug →
inferno	9–6	-0.06	24%	11 Aug →
anubis	7–2	0.10	40%	11 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.13	51%	11 Aug →
train	2–13	-0.06	36%	10 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.06	33%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	32%	10 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	21%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.11	23%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	39%	9 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	25%	9 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	19%	9 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	33%	9 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	18%	9 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.04	12%	9 Aug →
dust2	1–13	0.04	31%	5 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	14%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	22%	5 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.01	38%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.07	32%	5 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.12	35%	4 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.00	22%	4 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	36%	4 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.04	29%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.11	31%	4 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.04	19%	4 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.03	20%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	23%	3 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	36%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.06	38%	2 Aug →
dust2	8–2	0.15	33%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.29	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	14%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	25%	2 Aug →
ancient	0–13	-0.04	67%	2 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.11	19%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.00	25%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.05	31%	31 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.03	36%	31 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	17%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.04	28%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.02	34%	30 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.00	21%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.07	24%	30 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.13	24%	29 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.10	28%	29 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.01	24%	29 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.06	51%	29 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	57%	29 Jul →
office	7–13	0.07	33%	29 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.03	40%	29 Jul →
vertigo	13–2	0.09	48%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.11	22%	29 Jul →
anubis	16–12	0.08	23%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.00	13%	27 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	27%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.18	50%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.15	29%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	16%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.02	16%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.09	40%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.04	27%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	19%	26 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.09	7%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	21%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.10	29%	26 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.08	21%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	23%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.13	37%	25 Jul →