TeeVoh

TeeVoh — CS2 Stats

US76561199231318162[U:1:1271052434]Steam profile ↗

2,065Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,591Blue band · top ~41.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9126 of 13013 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTeeVohFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER12,591 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning50
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateWLWWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.3
Aggression6.9
Utility4.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.0
Utility4.4
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time583ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+6.3%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 13–7
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA31171455%0.03
dust2D1541127%-0.01
infernoA149564%0.06
nukeS139469%0.04
anubisC135838%0.01
ancientS96367%0.04
cacheA53260%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

226Matches
51%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
80.5ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8952%1.1115.2
Ancient3165%1.2116.6
Dust23043%1.0615.6
Anubis2227%0.9513.2
Nuke2273%1.2117.8
Inferno1362%1.3216.0
Overpass560%1.1817.8
Cache560%1.5719.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
67.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
586msReaction time
28.1%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
8.06HE damage / grenade
5.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4461 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.078% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–80.0526%28 Aug
dust29–13-0.079%28 Aug
nuke13–110.0520%28 Aug
inferno6–40.0213%24 Aug
dust22–13-0.057%21 Aug
inferno8–130.0122%21 Aug
dust213–10-0.0742%21 Aug
inferno13–20.1017%21 Aug
mirage14–160.0114%21 Aug
inferno16–120.0718%20 Aug
nuke7–130.0720%20 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0314%19 Aug
mirage9–13-0.039%18 Aug
mirage16–130.0611%18 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0267%17 Aug
nuke13–30.0911%17 Aug
mirage16–140.0512%17 Aug
dust28–13-0.0324%17 Aug
dust213–16-0.0318%17 Aug
anubis13–40.0313%17 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0016%17 Aug
dust29–13-0.0636%15 Aug
anubis11–130.0519%15 Aug
nuke13–40.0320%15 Aug
nuke13–40.0116%15 Aug
cache13–60.0511%15 Aug
mirage2–6-0.0225%13 Aug
inferno13–40.1426%12 Aug
mirage13–50.0513%12 Aug
dust28–13-0.0020%12 Aug
ancient13–80.0814%11 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0010%11 Aug
anubis10–130.0114%11 Aug
cache15–150.0521%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.0432%10 Aug
inferno13–70.2027%10 Aug
anubis13–90.0312%10 Aug
mirage13–60.1514%10 Aug
dust26–130.0219%9 Aug
dust213–90.0120%8 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0218%8 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0215%8 Aug
anubis16–140.007%7 Aug
inferno9–130.047%6 Aug
nuke8–130.0314%6 Aug
nuke13–110.0527%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0011%5 Aug
anubis1–70.0025%5 Aug
mirage13–90.0417%5 Aug
mirage13–30.078%4 Aug
dust210–130.0364%4 Aug
mirage8–00.0415%4 Aug
nuke13–30.0012%4 Aug
mirage15–150.0315%4 Aug
inferno16–130.0310%3 Aug
ancient13–60.0810%3 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0214%1 Aug
mirage13–60.1016%1 Aug
cache13–100.0311%1 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0518%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.0621%31 Jul
mirage13–80.0610%31 Jul
mirage14–160.0127%31 Jul
ancient13–70.039%31 Jul
mirage13–50.067%30 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0211%30 Jul
inferno13–60.078%30 Jul
anubis3–12-0.0514%30 Jul
dust213–10.057%30 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0519%30 Jul
mirage13–70.0718%29 Jul
nuke5–13-0.019%29 Jul
mirage13–80.079%28 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0012%28 Jul
mirage8–130.0523%28 Jul
dust217–190.029%28 Jul
mirage13–40.1216%27 Jul
ancient13–90.0415%27 Jul
nuke13–100.0318%27 Jul
mirage10–130.0012%27 Jul
mirage13–40.055%27 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0516%26 Jul
cache7–13-0.029%24 Jul
ancient13–100.0711%24 Jul
inferno15–150.0712%22 Jul
inferno11–13-0.019%22 Jul
cache13–10-0.0012%22 Jul
nuke16–120.0612%22 Jul
mirage8–130.0411%22 Jul
ancient13–20.158%21 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0615%20 Jul
mirage10–130.0410%20 Jul
dust213–100.0720%20 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0318%20 Jul
mirage13–80.026%20 Jul
nuke9–130.0613%20 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0416%19 Jul
anubis15–150.108%19 Jul
inferno13–80.1013%19 Jul
anubis13–100.0814%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →