pullarN — CS2 Stats

76561199224277547[U:1:1264011819]

918Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,623 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpullarNFACEITLevel 9 · 1,623 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning53
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4753Last 10047%Win rateWWLLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7
Aggression7.0
Utility7.1
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.3
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time618ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy25.6%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — ancient 13–4
133Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
710In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC36152142%0.02
dust2S1510567%0.02
ancientB105550%0.05
anubisD81713%-0.02
infernoB84450%-0.01
nukeS75271%-0.00
vertigoB63350%-0.02
cacheD51420%-0.00
overpass42250%0.01
train110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

423Matches
53%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
78.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11253%1.2216.2
Ancient6755%1.1115.6
Inferno5250%1.0515.7
Dust24351%1.0114.4
Anubis1759%1.2717.6
Nuke1354%1.0514.4
Overpass1258%1.3214.5
Train743%1.1516.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.2%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
613msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
51.9%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
11.03HE damage / grenade
14.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5051% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–120.0426%19 Aug
dust216–130.0332%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0426%18 Aug
overpass11–130.0123%18 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0239%18 Aug
dust213–110.0939%17 Aug
anubis11–130.0226%14 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0131%14 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0321%14 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0230%4 Aug
dust219–17-0.0129%3 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0233%2 Aug
dust213–80.0729%27 Jul
ancient16–140.0937%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0522%27 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0319%27 Jul
nuke13–80.0332%27 Jul
dust211–130.0321%27 Jul
ancient4–130.0024%27 Jul
mirage13–60.0120%27 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0322%27 Jul
train13–50.0616%26 Jul
ancient14–160.0722%25 Jul
mirage6–130.0428%24 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0316%24 Jul
mirage16–140.0822%24 Jul
cache10–130.0225%24 Jul
mirage12–160.0517%23 Jul
dust213–90.0737%23 Jul
cache11–130.0523%23 Jul
vertigo13–6-0.0121%23 Jul
mirage13–50.0822%23 Jul
dust24–13-0.0818%22 Jul
mirage13–100.1137%22 Jul
mirage13–100.0527%22 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0135%22 Jul
cache6–130.0226%22 Jul
mirage3–12-0.0232%21 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0215%21 Jul
mirage8–130.0327%21 Jul
mirage10–130.0320%21 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0320%17 Jul
nuke5–9-0.0221%17 Jul
inferno4–9-0.0921%17 Jul
vertigo13–90.0422%15 Jul
nuke13–80.0226%15 Jul
mirage5–130.1133%14 Jul
mirage16–120.0538%14 Jul
dust213–4-0.0223%14 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0413%14 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0122%13 Jul
dust213–100.0328%13 Jul
mirage13–30.0224%13 Jul
inferno13–40.0626%13 Jul
ancient13–100.0924%13 Jul
vertigo5–13-0.0924%12 Jul
dust210–130.0223%12 Jul
ancient0–8-0.056%12 Jul
ancient13–40.2322%12 Jul
mirage10–130.0523%12 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0516%11 Jul
mirage13–30.0227%11 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0225%10 Jul
anubis0–13-0.089%10 Jul
anubis12–16-0.0919%9 Jul
dust213–100.0436%9 Jul
dust213–40.0517%9 Jul
overpass3–80.0153%9 Jul
mirage13–80.0815%9 Jul
dust28–13-0.0542%9 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0221%8 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0524%8 Jul
dust213–110.0732%7 Jul
mirage10–130.0220%7 Jul
overpass13–100.0632%7 Jul
ancient13–100.0431%7 Jul
mirage13–110.0228%7 Jul
mirage13–70.0413%7 Jul
mirage13–50.0420%7 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0221%6 Jul
mirage13–80.0822%6 Jul
nuke16–140.0325%6 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0022%6 Jul
vertigo13–80.0114%6 Jul
mirage13–80.059%6 Jul
anubis13–90.1327%6 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0324%5 Jul
overpass13–9-0.0324%3 Jul
mirage10–13-0.1220%2 Jul
cache13–5-0.0615%2 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0419%2 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0223%1 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0130%1 Jul
vertigo4–13-0.0221%1 Jul
dust210–13-0.0330%30 Jun
mirage13–70.0738%28 Jun
inferno8–20.077%28 Jun
vertigo10–13-0.0327%28 Jun
cache3–13-0.0430%28 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0219%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →