toji fushiguro — CS2 Stats

76561199220014548[U:1:1259748820]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

892Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,925 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning50

Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateWWLWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3

Aggression6.2

Utility6.5

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels1.9

Clutch3.2

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning5.0

Utility6.5

Mechanics8.5

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time620ms+2ms

first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms

Headshot accuracy29.3%+2.3%

first ⅓ avg 27.1% → last ⅓ avg 29.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — dust2 13–7

13–0Biggest win — dust2

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 55% over 22anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	22	12–10	55%	0.03
ancient	C	18	8–10	44%	0.02
mirage	B	18	9–9	50%	0.02
inferno	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.00
nuke	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.00
anubis	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.00
overpass	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
cache	—	3	1–2	33%	0.03
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

241Matches

55%Win rate

1.23Avg K/D

75.4ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	48	54%	1.33	17.1
Mirage	47	49%	1.23	16.5
Ancient	33	64%	1.19	15.9
Dust2	31	45%	1.21	16.4
Nuke	23	39%	1.08	16.5
Vertigo	20	70%	1.19	16.8
Overpass	19	68%	1.35	16.5
Anubis	16	69%	1.11	15.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.7%Headshot accuracy

34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.3%Spray accuracy

88.2%Counter-strafing

11.1°Preaim

622msReaction time

29.9%T opening success

45.7%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

16.4%Flash assists

8.70HE damage / grenade

10.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.9061% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	9–4	0.11	35%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–0	0.04	45%	9 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.07	8%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	25%	9 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.01	40%	9 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.01	25%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.07	29%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	31%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.07	39%	28 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	22%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.03	15%	19 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.05	40%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.11	39%	19 Jul →
cache	4–2	0.00	0%	13 Jul →
dust2	0–2	-0.09	0%	13 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.03	22%	12 Jul →
nuke	4–13	0.05	27%	5 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.06	52%	3 Jun →
poseidon	9–2	0.16	50%	28 May →
nuke	13–8	0.03	48%	25 May →
mirage	13–4	0.07	31%	23 May →
inferno	13–10	0.02	38%	20 May →
overpass	9–13	0.09	38%	20 May →
inferno	9–13	0.04	31%	20 May →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	29%	20 May →
mirage	13–11	0.20	32%	19 May →
mirage	13–7	0.02	32%	14 May →
dust2	8–13	0.07	33%	14 May →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	26%	14 May →
anubis	3–13	0.04	24%	14 May →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	17%	8 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	23%	7 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	20%	7 May →
mirage	13–10	0.02	28%	7 May →
cache	4–13	-0.00	32%	6 May →
cache	3–13	0.09	41%	6 May →
dust2	16–12	0.05	28%	28 Apr →
inferno	3–13	-0.08	39%	24 Apr →
mirage	11–13	0.04	19%	24 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.17	24%	24 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.10	24%	24 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.25	35%	9 Apr →
overpass	5–13	-0.04	33%	9 Apr →
inferno	13–11	-0.07	19%	4 Apr →
nuke	15–15	0.01	39%	4 Apr →
ancient	11–13	0.01	29%	4 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	36%	4 Apr →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	26%	2 Apr →
mirage	5–13	0.01	31%	2 Apr →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	20%	18 Mar →
mirage	12–16	0.02	24%	17 Mar →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	8%	17 Mar →
overpass	13–9	0.01	31%	17 Mar →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	16%	17 Mar →
dust2	16–14	0.02	20%	17 Mar →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	30%	17 Mar →
ancient	13–6	0.07	24%	17 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.02	28%	17 Mar →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	29%	16 Mar →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	45%	16 Mar →
nuke	13–6	0.03	47%	16 Mar →
ancient	13–5	0.02	13%	16 Mar →
inferno	8–13	0.00	20%	16 Mar →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	23%	16 Mar →
inferno	11–13	0.03	28%	16 Mar →
dust2	13–16	0.02	24%	16 Mar →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	37%	16 Mar →
inferno	13–4	0.08	28%	12 Mar →
overpass	5–13	-0.05	17%	12 Mar →
ancient	6–13	0.00	17%	12 Mar →
overpass	12–12	-0.02	44%	12 Mar →
dust2	8–13	0.05	27%	10 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.03	21%	10 Mar →
inferno	13–11	-0.05	14%	10 Mar →
overpass	13–11	-0.04	8%	10 Mar →
mirage	9–13	0.03	63%	10 Mar →
dust2	13–2	0.03	15%	10 Mar →
overpass	13–8	-0.01	20%	5 Mar →
mirage	9–13	-0.09	35%	5 Mar →
ancient	11–13	0.02	21%	5 Mar →
dust2	11–13	0.02	24%	5 Mar →
nuke	12–12	0.03	31%	5 Mar →
ancient	7–13	0.01	24%	4 Mar →
inferno	13–9	0.02	26%	4 Mar →
dust2	13–11	0.01	20%	4 Mar →
ancient	7–13	0.02	29%	4 Mar →
inferno	13–11	0.05	14%	4 Mar →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	24%	4 Mar →
anubis	7–13	-0.00	31%	4 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.06	32%	4 Mar →
inferno	13–10	0.00	26%	1 Mar →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	20%	27 Feb →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	15%	27 Feb →
inferno	6–13	0.01	30%	27 Feb →
dust2	1–13	-0.05	22%	27 Feb →
ancient	6–0	0.01	75%	27 Feb →
dust2	13–7	0.02	24%	27 Feb →
anubis	13–6	0.04	28%	27 Feb →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	47%	27 Feb →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	22%	27 Feb →