hlpl — CS2 Stats

76561199210491970[U:1:1250226242]

1,096Tracked matches70%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,840 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhlplFACEITLevel 9 · 1,840 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning57
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57349Last 10057%Win rateWWWWWLWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression6.6
Utility4.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.7
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time519ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — debris 9–4
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
W5Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8vertigoWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2013765%0.00
mirageS1611569%0.03
anubisA148657%0.04
vertigoC125742%0.01
officeA85363%0.01
cacheS86275%0.05
overpassB63350%0.05
debris42250%0.12
nuke41325%-0.03
dust23030%-0.04
train21150%0.07
ancient110100%0.03
stronghold1010%0.02
alpine110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

206Matches
57%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
82.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7059%1.2615.2
Vertigo3269%1.5716.4
Ancient3152%1.1115.8
Dust22361%1.2717.0
Anubis1867%1.0515.4
Inferno1250%1.1516.1
Nuke850%1.2715.9
Train250%0.9416.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
505msReaction time
26.1%T opening success
56.0%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
7.39HE damage / grenade
10.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4276 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.1042% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategyVertigo grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–11-0.0118%19 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0216%11 Aug
inferno13–100.0128%10 Aug
anubis13–90.0319%5 Aug
anubis13–80.1823%5 Aug
debris5–9-0.1020%4 Aug
debris9–40.2426%4 Aug
debris8–80.0929%4 Aug
inferno9–70.0523%4 Aug
debris9–40.2417%4 Aug
vertigo13–70.0227%1 Aug
vertigo12–120.0312%31 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0929%28 Jul
anubis13–50.2121%26 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0217%26 Jul
anubis13–60.0525%21 Jul
mirage13–00.0531%20 Jul
inferno16–120.0121%20 Jul
mirage13–80.118%20 Jul
ancient13–100.0318%20 Jul
mirage13–30.117%15 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0113%15 Jul
office13–7-0.0315%10 Jul
office8–130.0011%10 Jul
mirage17–190.0127%9 Jul
anubis19–170.0518%9 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0118%9 Jul
mirage13–100.0411%8 Jul
mirage13–90.0214%8 Jul
stronghold12–120.0228%8 Jul
office7–100.0118%8 Jul
office12–120.0114%8 Jul
alpine13–40.0612%7 Jul
cache13–30.0423%7 Jul
cache9–130.0019%7 Jul
inferno8–80.017%25 Jun
overpass3–9-0.107%25 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0114%25 Jun
mirage13–90.0918%25 Jun
anubis6–130.0415%24 Jun
mirage13–70.0018%16 Jun
anubis13–50.0210%11 Jun
nuke6–9-0.0218%10 Jun
dust24–13-0.0211%10 Jun
mirage13–50.0930%10 Jun
office13–11-0.0813%8 Jun
vertigo13–7-0.079%8 Jun
overpass7–9-0.030%8 Jun
vertigo3–13-0.0217%8 Jun
vertigo13–50.1531%8 Jun
dust24–13-0.1020%7 Jun
overpass9–50.2018%7 Jun
inferno9–50.098%7 Jun
inferno9–0-0.0533%7 Jun
inferno8–8-0.1013%7 Jun
inferno6–9-0.1020%7 Jun
inferno9–50.0613%7 Jun
inferno2–9-0.2167%7 Jun
inferno9–30.1020%7 Jun
inferno10–130.0215%7 Jun
inferno9–60.1316%6 Jun
vertigo9–130.0518%6 Jun
vertigo3–13-0.0617%5 Jun
vertigo10–130.0315%5 Jun
vertigo2–130.0013%3 Jun
vertigo0–3-0.040%3 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0114%2 Jun
nuke9–7-0.033%2 Jun
nuke5–9-0.0718%27 May
anubis13–50.0627%27 May
cache13–11-0.029%26 May
mirage13–80.0116%26 May
mirage13–20.0012%26 May
mirage0–8-0.020%25 May
overpass8–8-0.0816%16 May
inferno9–7-0.097%16 May
inferno2–9-0.069%16 May
overpass9–10.2013%16 May
office13–90.0820%13 May
office13–90.1011%13 May
office13–8-0.0124%13 May
overpass9–50.124%12 May
cache13–80.0015%6 May
cache13–10.1223%6 May
mirage11–130.0320%1 May
cache6–130.0630%29 Apr
cache13–40.1517%29 Apr
cache13–90.0219%29 Apr
train13–8-0.0017%24 Apr
train8–130.1423%24 Apr
vertigo13–7-0.0522%8 Apr
vertigo13–60.0217%8 Apr
dust25–130.016%7 Apr
inferno9–70.0121%4 Apr
inferno9–30.1015%4 Apr
inferno9–5-0.0518%4 Apr
inferno5–9-0.0242%4 Apr
inferno9–50.1820%4 Apr
anubis12–120.0218%1 Apr
anubis12–120.0824%1 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →