BeansLegume

BeansLegume — CS2 Stats

76561199204200726[U:1:1243934998]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,513Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,390Blue band · top ~31.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26326 of 41623 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBeansLegumeFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER14,390 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning43
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46468Last 10046%Win rateLLWTWLWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression5.3
Utility3.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 648ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.3
Utility3.0
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time638ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — inferno 9–3
132Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 33% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD30102033%-0.01
ancientB168850%-0.02
cacheB136746%-0.01
nukeB126650%-0.01
anubisB84450%-0.00
dust2A74357%-0.01
mirageS75271%0.02
poseidon3030%0.05
overpass220100%-0.01
debris110100%0.12
vertigo1010%-0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

20Matches
45%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
75.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage956%0.9715.0
Anubis425%0.8916.3
Ancient250%0.9515.5
Inferno250%1.5416.5
Vertigo20%0.6712.5
Dust21100%1.5628.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
648msReaction time
23.5%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
0.7%Flash assists
6.06HE damage / grenade
4.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3673 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.5189% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–130.0121%29 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0113%25 Aug
ancient13–70.027%25 Aug
cache15–150.019%25 Aug
dust213–50.0226%25 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0417%22 Aug
cache13–80.0313%22 Aug
mirage13–70.0323%21 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0116%20 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0315%7 Aug
nuke13–50.0820%7 Aug
mirage13–70.0421%7 Aug
cache16–14-0.0122%6 Aug
ancient16–13-0.009%21 Jul
inferno9–30.2226%21 Jul
inferno7–9-0.1850%20 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0412%17 Jul
anubis13–50.2122%17 Jul
dust213–90.0427%17 Jul
poseidon5–90.1118%17 Jul
dust29–13-0.0314%17 Jul
cache6–13-0.0814%16 Jul
anubis5–13-0.048%16 Jul
dust213–7-0.019%16 Jul
inferno13–110.0311%15 Jul
inferno9–7-0.0229%15 Jul
cache13–6-0.0316%14 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0813%14 Jul
cache11–13-0.0712%14 Jul
ancient10–13-0.074%14 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0610%10 Jul
cache5–13-0.0021%10 Jul
mirage13–90.0427%9 Jul
nuke8–130.0628%9 Jul
cache7–13-0.0226%9 Jul
mirage15–150.0526%9 Jul
ancient13–110.0021%9 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0115%9 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0030%9 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0119%9 Jul
cache13–40.0512%9 Jul
anubis7–130.0111%9 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0431%9 Jul
debris9–50.1222%9 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0412%8 Jul
inferno4–9-0.1514%8 Jul
vertigo3–9-0.1817%8 Jul
inferno9–30.2553%8 Jul
ancient7–130.0013%8 Jul
cache13–60.0115%8 Jul
inferno4–9-0.1825%7 Jul
inferno9–40.0313%7 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0221%7 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0012%7 Jul
cache9–13-0.0317%7 Jul
cache11–130.0119%7 Jul
overpass13–40.0426%7 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0711%3 Jul
anubis13–100.0426%3 Jul
ancient16–120.0314%3 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0914%2 Jul
ancient14–16-0.067%2 Jul
inferno9–5-0.0129%1 Jul
inferno3–90.0823%1 Jul
nuke13–90.018%26 Jun
inferno9–6-0.0017%26 Jun
nuke13–10-0.035%26 Jun
inferno9–10.1219%26 Jun
inferno7–9-0.0930%25 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0053%25 Jun
anubis16–12-0.076%25 Jun
poseidon6–90.008%25 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0917%24 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0410%23 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0920%23 Jun
inferno8–80.058%23 Jun
inferno6–9-0.0320%21 Jun
inferno9–60.2222%21 Jun
inferno5–90.0416%21 Jun
cache13–8-0.0318%21 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0213%18 Jun
inferno3–9-0.0543%17 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0821%16 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0016%15 Jun
ancient13–50.0413%15 Jun
poseidon7–90.0535%15 Jun
inferno9–50.0515%13 Jun
inferno1–9-0.1515%13 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0213%10 Jun
inferno5–9-0.2127%8 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0015%8 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0342%8 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0313%6 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0411%6 Jun
dust213–4-0.0415%6 Jun
dust29–13-0.0420%6 Jun
inferno4–9-0.1117%6 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0117%5 Jun
inferno15–150.0213%5 Jun
inferno2–6-0.0318%5 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →