Fangerzzz — CS2 Stats

76561199181168696[U:1:1220902968]

386Tracked matches46%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.0 Developing
Premier CS Rating7,274Light Blue band · top ~67.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23197 of 30751 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFangerzzzPREMIER7,274 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning49
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46504Last 10046%Win rateLWWLWTWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6
Aggression5.5
Utility3.0
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch0.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.9
Utility3.0
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact3.8

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time665ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 706ms → last ⅓ avg 665ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — dust2 11–5
130Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC26111542%-0.01
ancientC167944%-0.01
dust2C167944%-0.00
cacheB126650%-0.04
anubisA117464%-0.00
nukeS96367%-0.01
infernoD62433%0.00
train2020%-0.02
poseidon1010%0.03
overpass1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

15Matches
53%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
65.5ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis475%1.0114.0
Cache475%0.7511.3
Mirage425%0.7513.5
Ancient333%0.7214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
72.4%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
659msReaction time
26.8%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
8.32HE damage / grenade
4.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3274 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.7955% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient14–16-0.0125%21 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0413%18 Aug
cache12–80.0129%18 Aug
ancient8–13-0.047%15 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0121%15 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0228%14 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0116%14 Aug
inferno10–130.0424%14 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0515%11 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0515%11 Aug
ancient11–13-0.1010%8 Aug
dust25–13-0.0119%6 Aug
poseidon3–90.0330%6 Aug
ancient11–130.0112%6 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0510%6 Aug
cache13–70.0119%6 Aug
dust25–13-0.0227%5 Aug
anubis13–90.0523%5 Aug
inferno5–130.0311%5 Aug
cache13–30.0415%5 Aug
anubis13–90.0813%5 Aug
dust26–130.0223%4 Aug
nuke6–13-0.029%4 Aug
cache13–7-0.0412%3 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0611%2 Aug
cache13–4-0.0324%2 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0518%2 Aug
anubis0–13-0.0516%2 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0819%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0126%1 Aug
mirage5–5-0.0025%1 Aug
cache1–13-0.0750%1 Aug
dust211–50.1037%1 Aug
ancient13–60.0115%1 Aug
anubis9–130.0013%1 Aug
anubis9–00.0914%1 Aug
ancient13–10.0825%31 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0229%31 Jul
dust24–13-0.0438%31 Jul
mirage13–110.0423%31 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0610%31 Jul
dust213–10-0.0213%31 Jul
inferno16–130.0718%31 Jul
cache10–13-0.080%31 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0411%31 Jul
dust213–9-0.0336%31 Jul
dust213–30.0110%30 Jul
mirage7–4-0.025%30 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0225%29 Jul
dust212–12-0.0223%29 Jul
dust28–13-0.0023%29 Jul
mirage6–130.057%28 Jul
mirage6–130.0415%28 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0420%28 Jul
dust210–130.0215%27 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0216%27 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0722%27 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0427%27 Jul
inferno11–13-0.064%27 Jul
ancient13–80.0729%27 Jul
ancient6–130.0019%27 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0119%27 Jul
ancient13–110.0337%27 Jul
cache13–11-0.0422%26 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0822%26 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0611%26 Jul
overpass6–13-0.045%26 Jul
dust213–110.0635%26 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0521%26 Jul
nuke13–00.0616%25 Jul
nuke13–60.029%25 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0014%25 Jul
cache7–13-0.0427%25 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0021%25 Jul
nuke13–90.0126%25 Jul
nuke13–20.0516%25 Jul
dust213–110.0022%25 Jul
cache6–13-0.0219%25 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0420%24 Jul
train2–130.0120%24 Jul
ancient13–16-0.068%23 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0114%23 Jul
dust28–13-0.0619%23 Jul
dust213–100.0113%22 Jul
mirage6–130.0213%22 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0812%22 Jul
mirage11–13-0.055%22 Jul
train0–13-0.0522%22 Jul
mirage13–50.0217%22 Jul
mirage13–50.0828%22 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0928%21 Jul
ancient10–130.026%21 Jul
anubis13–100.0318%21 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0515%21 Jul
mirage16–130.0916%21 Jul
dust29–13-0.0223%21 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0614%21 Jul
cache5–13-0.105%21 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0118%21 Jul
cache11–13-0.0715%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →