Freakbob — CS2 Stats

RO76561199173771743[U:1:1213506015]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

683Tracked matches55%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,132Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2794 of 8467 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning60

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateLLWTWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3

Aggression6.5

Utility3.1

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch6.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning6.0

Utility3.1

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.07

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time569ms+28ms

first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms

Headshot accuracy21.8%+0.0%

first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — inferno 13–16

13–0Biggest win — anubis

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 80% over 5cacheWeakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.01
mirage	A	19	11–8	58%	0.02
dust2	A	18	11–7	61%	0.02
cache	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.01
anubis	S	8	6–2	75%	0.02
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	0.02
nuke	S	7	5–2	71%	0.01
office	S	5	4–1	80%	0.03
debris	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.08
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.02
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches

67%Win rate

0.84Avg K/D

70.2ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	2	50%	1.14	20.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.35	6.0
Cache	1	100%	1.20	12.0
Ancient	1	100%	0.73	11.0
Dust2	1	100%	0.50	10.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy

28.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.5%Spray accuracy

80.1%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

597msReaction time

39.3%T opening success

41.8%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

6.1%Flash assists

11.09HE damage / grenade

3.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.461 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.262% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	2–9	-0.24	10%	22 Aug →
inferno	7–9	-0.06	14%	22 Aug →
inferno	9–4	0.06	21%	22 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.15	31%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.05	17%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.01	21%	22 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.11	45%	21 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.04	17%	21 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	18%	20 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	15%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.08	26%	19 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	10%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	19%	19 Aug →
inferno	4–9	-0.15	8%	18 Aug →
anubis	16–13	-0.00	15%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.08	19%	18 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	21%	17 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.01	18%	17 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	12%	17 Aug →
nuke	4–9	-0.01	20%	17 Aug →
nuke	9–7	0.06	27%	17 Aug →
inferno	0–3	-0.08	20%	14 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	21%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.06	18%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	20%	11 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	19%	9 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	34%	9 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.05	23%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	24%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	24%	9 Aug →
office	10–13	-0.03	34%	9 Aug →
office	13–2	-0.04	55%	9 Aug →
office	13–10	0.09	21%	6 Aug →
vertigo	13–4	0.02	31%	6 Aug →
nuke	11–5	-0.03	30%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.04	33%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.02	27%	4 Aug →
office	13–9	0.17	33%	4 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.09	20%	3 Aug →
cache	3–2	-0.10	50%	3 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.05	18%	3 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.04	41%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.06	21%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.07	19%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	21%	24 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.00	10%	19 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.14	19%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.09	14%	18 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	10%	18 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.04	29%	17 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	8%	16 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	17%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.00	14%	16 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	25%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.08	17%	14 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.08	21%	14 Jul →
cache	3–10	0.05	21%	13 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.05	28%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.07	26%	12 Jul →
boulder	13–7	-0.03	44%	11 Jul →
office	13–10	-0.01	23%	11 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.07	5%	11 Jul →
debris	6–9	-0.09	16%	9 Jul →
debris	3–9	-0.07	25%	9 Jul →
eldorado	9–2	0.03	60%	9 Jul →
dust2	12–16	-0.06	11%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.15	22%	2 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.06	49%	30 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.00	24%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.05	17%	29 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	15%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	14%	29 Jun →
anubis	13–9	0.06	13%	28 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	13%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–0	0.00	18%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.06	15%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.12	25%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.08	17%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.14	24%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.08	18%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.12	24%	25 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.10	20%	19 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	28%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.03	21%	19 Jun →
inferno	4–6	-0.17	0%	13 Jun →
overpass	12–14	-0.05	7%	8 Jun →
anubis	13–9	0.09	25%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.05	21%	7 Jun →
dust2	6–10	0.13	13%	6 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.05	34%	6 Jun →
inferno	13–16	0.23	29%	5 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.09	20%	5 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.04	21%	31 May →
mirage	13–5	0.05	31%	30 May →
overpass	5–13	0.02	25%	30 May →
dust2	13–4	0.14	47%	30 May →
dust2	13–8	0.06	21%	30 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	13%	24 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	30%	18 May →
cache	4–6	-0.07	27%	11 May →