Prol — CS2 Stats

76561199166301126[U:1:1206035398]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

153Tracked matches30%Win rate2026Tracked since

CSDB Rating2.3 Learning

Premier CS Rating13,393Blue band · top ~36.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#36637 of 56330 tracked

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37

Positioning36

Utility17

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–58–2Last 10040%Win rateLLLWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.07 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.7

Aggression3.1

Utility1.7

Positioning3.6

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7

Positioning3.6

Utility1.7

Mechanics2.2

Opening Duels0.3

Win Impact0.0

Composite 2.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time621ms+5ms

first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms

Headshot accuracy16.9%−0.2%

first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — inferno 9–0

13–1Biggest win — vertigo

5Longest win streak

L3Current streak

4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 50% over 8infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	32	13–19	41%	-0.04
nuke	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.03
dust2	D	15	5–10	33%	-0.03
inferno	D	12	3–9	25%	-0.02
cache	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.04
office	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.04
anubis	—	4	3–1	75%	-0.02
ancient	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.04
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

41Matches

37%Win rate

0.58Avg K/D

48.0ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

4%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	17	41%	0.66	9.9
Inferno	6	50%	0.51	8.5
Cache	5	20%	0.56	10.6
Dust2	4	0%	0.66	10.5
Anubis	4	75%	0.43	7.8
Nuke	2	0%	0.54	10.0
Ancient	2	0%	0.33	6.5
Vertigo	1	100%	0.62	5.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy

29.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.8%Spray accuracy

59.9%Counter-strafing

10.0°Preaim

628msReaction time

21.8%T opening success

32.7%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

6.51HE damage / grenade

1.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.422 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 21.8238% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	9–13	-0.12	11%	30 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	19%	30 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	11%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	15%	29 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.07	11%	29 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	27%	29 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.02	14%	29 Aug →
office	2–13	-0.08	17%	29 Aug →
mirage	0–7	-0.09	9%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.00	19%	29 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	14%	29 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.10	15%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–8	-0.08	17%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.03	37%	28 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	5%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.00	24%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	8%	26 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.04	25%	26 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.10	26%	26 Aug →
inferno	9–0	0.25	8%	26 Aug →
inferno	6–9	-0.01	22%	26 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	9%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.00	12%	26 Aug →
office	7–13	-0.04	24%	25 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.01	22%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	8%	25 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.10	10%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	17%	25 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	32%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.00	18%	25 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	19%	24 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	17%	24 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	15%	24 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	22%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	10%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.01	18%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	21%	24 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.03	18%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	17%	23 Aug →
vertigo	13–1	-0.00	18%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	16%	23 Aug →
office	13–10	-0.05	24%	23 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	14%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	21%	22 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	20%	22 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.01	27%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	22%	22 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.01	21%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	18%	22 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	25%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.00	17%	21 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	13%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.01	22%	21 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	11%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.00	24%	21 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.06	13%	21 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.02	38%	21 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	16%	21 Aug →
office	6–13	-0.07	11%	20 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.10	21%	20 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.09	21%	20 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.11	23%	20 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.05	16%	20 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	20%	20 Aug →
office	13–8	-0.04	21%	20 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	30%	20 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	23%	20 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	21%	19 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.03	23%	19 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.06	25%	19 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	17%	19 Aug →
office	13–7	0.04	16%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.07	11%	19 Aug →
mirage	8–2	-0.03	3%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	31%	18 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.00	19%	18 Aug →
ancient	16–12	-0.06	6%	18 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	12%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.02	24%	18 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.03	17%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.09	20%	18 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	8%	18 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.07	40%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	13%	17 Aug →
nuke	6–0	0.03	17%	17 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	19%	16 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	12%	16 Aug →
mirage	1–4	-0.06	0%	16 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	15%	16 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.09	22%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.08	8%	14 Aug →
office	10–13	0.00	19%	14 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	17%	11 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.10	21%	9 Aug →
dust2	2–6	-0.01	23%	9 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	13%	9 Aug →
nuke	2–8	-0.07	25%	9 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	17%	31 Jul →
office	13–11	-0.09	17%	31 Jul →