BunnyGirlez — CS2 Stats

76561199153290331[U:1:1193024603]

1,448Tracked matches34%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,709Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13116 of 36598 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,784 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning57

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateLLLLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9

Aggression7.3

Utility5.2

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels3.5

Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning5.7

Utility5.2

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time582ms+7ms

first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms

Headshot accuracy20.6%+0.2%

first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — nuke 16–12

13–1Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

L4Current streak

11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 47% over 36

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	36	17–19	47%	0.02
dust2	A	29	17–12	59%	0.03
nuke	A	9	5–4	56%	0.06
cache	A	7	4–3	57%	0.05
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	-0.03
anubis	S	6	4–2	67%	0.00
inferno	—	3	2–1	67%	0.03
shelter	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.04
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 36). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,082Matches

49%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

79.1ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	356	52%	1.13	16.0
Dust2	224	47%	1.12	16.7
Anubis	139	51%	1.15	16.5
Ancient	137	44%	1.02	15.9
Nuke	77	56%	1.13	17.0
Inferno	76	47%	1.02	15.6
Overpass	35	49%	0.91	14.2
Train	19	37%	1.18	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.4%Spray accuracy

77.8%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

568msReaction time

32.3%T opening success

55.5%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

8.0%Flash assists

8.65HE damage / grenade

11.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4898 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.346% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 36 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	14–16	-0.02	17%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	13%	27 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	21%	23 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	21%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.11	25%	19 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.10	30%	19 Aug →
nuke	9–6	0.10	10%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.08	27%	14 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.04	24%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.11	23%	13 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	29%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	17%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	21%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.05	13%	11 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	22%	11 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	12%	11 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	23%	10 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	23%	9 Aug →
nuke	9–4	0.11	23%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.07	39%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	18%	9 Aug →
anubis	3–11	-0.00	13%	6 Aug →
inferno	0–11	0.03	23%	6 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.15	26%	3 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.06	16%	3 Aug →
shelter	13–4	-0.05	18%	2 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	-0.04	19%	2 Aug →
ancient	2–9	-0.08	7%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.11	21%	31 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.00	16%	31 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.06	22%	30 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.05	24%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.08	23%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	29%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.03	19%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.05	7%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	18%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.05	13%	28 Jul →
dust2	12–16	0.03	23%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.03	27%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	33%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	29%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	20%	24 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.08	30%	24 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.00	13%	23 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.21	20%	23 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.00	24%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	17%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	23%	22 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	33%	21 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.00	18%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.10	29%	20 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	29%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	27%	19 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.02	17%	19 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	32%	19 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	8%	19 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	24%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.04	27%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.01	14%	18 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	17%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.05	18%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	24%	17 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	11%	17 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.06	22%	16 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	20%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.08	17%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.13	16%	15 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.03	38%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.10	18%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.09	23%	15 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.06	19%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.07	23%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.02	10%	14 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.05	17%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.10	33%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.01	16%	14 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.04	16%	14 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.03	22%	13 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.01	31%	12 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	35%	11 Jul →
shelter	7–13	-0.03	24%	10 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.02	15%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	21%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	14%	9 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.06	20%	9 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.05	14%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	18%	9 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	26%	9 Jul →
vertigo	9–4	0.12	7%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	24%	6 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.04	24%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.15	26%	6 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.00	18%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.07	30%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.02	11%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.08	10%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.03	14%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.13	21%	4 Jul →