TOUSTY- — CS2 Stats

76561199145581150[U:1:1185315422]

2,832Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,958Pink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7076 of 18509 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,046 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning66

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–58–2Last 10040%Win rateWLLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5

Aggression10.0

Utility5.5

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels5.0

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 69% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 69% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning6.6

Utility5.5

Mechanics5.3

Opening Duels5.0

Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time517ms−98ms

first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 517ms

Headshot accuracy24.8%+0.9%

first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–5

13–1Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

4–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 16mirageWeakest map · 33% over 40

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	D	40	13–27	33%	-0.00
dust2	B	16	8–8	50%	0.01
inferno	A	16	9–7	56%	0.01
ancient	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.01
nuke	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.09
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	0.00
anubis	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 40). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,920Matches

50%Win rate

1.21Avg K/D

80.0ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	357	47%	1.27	17.4
Ancient	202	47%	1.17	16.6
Dust2	176	49%	1.07	15.7
Anubis	145	52%	1.25	17.0
Inferno	139	53%	1.20	17.4
Nuke	38	37%	1.07	16.6
Overpass	33	52%	1.17	16.9
Vertigo	27	63%	1.40	17.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy

36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.1%Spray accuracy

73.8%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

510msReaction time

31.7%T opening success

68.6%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

9.2%Flash assists

10.38HE damage / grenade

8.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4885 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.7067% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 40 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–5	-0.03	23%	28 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	26%	27 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.00	10%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	27%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.04	26%	22 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.06	34%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.12	41%	21 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	17%	20 Aug →
mirage	11–2	0.11	0%	20 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	33%	19 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.01	34%	19 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	23%	18 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.03	28%	18 Aug →
dust2	22–18	-0.01	26%	18 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.01	31%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	19%	18 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.01	25%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.13	14%	18 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.03	21%	17 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	41%	17 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	48%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	23%	17 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	14%	14 Aug →
nuke	9–4	-0.09	24%	12 Aug →
inferno	5–9	0.03	38%	12 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.01	15%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.07	21%	12 Aug →
mirage	12–16	0.01	23%	12 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.02	23%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.03	19%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	20%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	20%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	33%	11 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	24%	11 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	15%	11 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	29%	11 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	28%	11 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	10%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.09	31%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.04	21%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.14	22%	9 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	32%	9 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.09	21%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.00	29%	9 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.06	25%	8 Aug →
inferno	22–25	-0.01	23%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	17%	8 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	19%	8 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	26%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.05	23%	7 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	21%	7 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	26%	7 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	23%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.06	21%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.03	23%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	18%	6 Aug →
anubis	12–16	-0.03	22%	6 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	0.06	31%	6 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	15%	6 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	33%	6 Aug →
mirage	19–15	0.07	23%	6 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	42%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	20%	5 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.02	19%	5 Aug →
nuke	7–9	-0.10	21%	4 Aug →
nuke	3–9	-0.13	13%	4 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.01	28%	4 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.04	19%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.06	29%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	19%	4 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.09	33%	3 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	22%	2 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	26%	2 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	18%	1 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.02	21%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	38%	31 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.02	18%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.01	27%	30 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	19%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.09	29%	30 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.00	30%	30 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	25%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	33%	30 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	18%	30 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	23%	30 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	19%	29 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	17%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.02	24%	29 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.00	21%	29 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.05	46%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.01	18%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	15%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	17%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.12	18%	29 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	35%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	14%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.04	21%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.00	17%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	38%	26 Jul →