chief — CS2 Stats

76561199119244673[U:1:1158978945]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,607Tracked matches72%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating9.0 EliteEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating27,283Top 10% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#864 of 22065 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,576 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim100

Positioning82

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT66–32–2Last 10066%Win rateWWWWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim10.0

Aggression10.0

Utility5.5

Positioning8.2

Opening Duels8.7

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like m0NESY 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 100 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 74% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 74% on CT to 56% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim10.0

Positioning8.2

Utility5.5

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels8.3

Win Impact10.0

Composite 9.0/10 (Elite), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.11+0.05

first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.11

Reaction time502ms−106ms

first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 502ms

Headshot accuracy50.4%+24.5%

first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 50.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.32Best rating — inferno 9–0

13–0Biggest win — ancient

10Longest win streak

W8Current streak

10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 85% over 13infernoWeakest map · 57% over 23

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	31	19–12	61%	0.09
inferno	A	23	13–10	57%	0.07
ancient	S	13	11–2	85%	0.08
dust2	S	13	9–4	69%	0.04
overpass	S	6	5–1	83%	0.05
nuke	A	5	3–2	60%	0.07
anubis	—	3	2–1	67%	0.15
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.23
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	0.08
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.16
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (57% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,663Matches

51%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

74.7ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	412	53%	1.15	15.9
Ancient	275	47%	1.15	16.3
Dust2	275	50%	1.10	14.9
Anubis	184	50%	1.18	16.9
Inferno	110	55%	1.11	15.8
Vertigo	41	56%	1.31	18.5
Overpass	26	58%	1.16	17.3
Nuke	25	32%	1.00	14.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

48.4%Headshot accuracy

43.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.6%Spray accuracy

87.7%Counter-strafing

6.7°Preaim

506msReaction time

56.1%T opening success

73.6%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

9.4%Flash assists

10.52HE damage / grenade

7.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4987 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–2	0.15	45%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.13	76%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–2	-0.02	58%	18 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.21	61%	18 Aug →
office	13–5	0.16	64%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–0	-0.02	100%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–0	0.25	59%	26 Jul →
cache	8–1	0.21	83%	26 Jul →
cache	0–9	-0.05	100%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.15	47%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.03	41%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.23	47%	16 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.14	60%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.13	58%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.15	53%	3 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.18	56%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.24	56%	3 Jul →
inferno	9–0	0.32	75%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.09	54%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.13	39%	13 Jun →
inferno	6–9	-0.04	46%	13 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	32%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.05	25%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.01	32%	12 Jun →
dust2	5–11	0.03	60%	8 Jun →
ancient	7–13	0.06	31%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.11	39%	7 Jun →
inferno	6–13	0.02	38%	4 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.14	23%	4 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.15	27%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.21	38%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.13	19%	3 Jun →
anubis	5–13	0.06	23%	3 Jun →
vertigo	13–1	0.25	32%	3 Jun →
inferno	16–14	0.11	27%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.11	20%	2 Jun →
overpass	13–6	0.07	24%	1 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.00	17%	1 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.13	33%	1 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	18%	1 Jun →
inferno	11–13	0.11	24%	29 May →
mirage	13–4	0.10	33%	29 May →
mirage	13–8	0.00	16%	27 May →
mirage	13–11	0.10	19%	27 May →
inferno	2–9	-0.05	16%	26 May →
inferno	9–7	0.07	23%	26 May →
inferno	9–7	0.16	18%	26 May →
overpass	9–4	0.05	22%	26 May →
inferno	9–2	0.18	22%	26 May →
inferno	8–8	-0.04	18%	26 May →
ancient	13–6	0.19	20%	24 May →
mirage	13–11	0.13	25%	24 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	15%	20 May →
inferno	9–12	0.04	32%	5 May →
mirage	13–1	0.07	18%	5 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	16%	5 May →
inferno	6–9	-0.11	9%	4 May →
ancient	13–5	0.06	23%	12 Jan →
ancient	13–4	0.03	22%	12 Jan →
nuke	13–8	0.04	39%	12 Jan →
dust2	13–7	0.07	15%	12 Jan →
dust2	16–14	0.09	32%	12 Jan →
inferno	13–3	0.09	28%	12 Jan →
nuke	13–8	0.08	27%	12 Jan →
mirage	13–10	0.09	23%	11 Jan →
inferno	16–13	0.15	41%	11 Jan →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	29%	11 Jan →
overpass	7–13	0.10	27%	11 Jan →
ancient	6–13	0.01	39%	11 Jan →
inferno	13–9	0.06	26%	11 Jan →
ancient	13–9	0.10	21%	11 Jan →
mirage	5–13	0.01	22%	11 Jan →
overpass	13–10	-0.01	21%	10 Jan →
overpass	13–8	0.07	27%	10 Jan →
nuke	13–10	0.10	31%	10 Jan →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	42%	10 Jan →
mirage	13–6	0.07	31%	10 Jan →
mirage	13–4	0.08	33%	9 Jan →
inferno	13–5	0.16	33%	9 Jan →
mirage	13–9	0.09	19%	9 Jan →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	14%	9 Jan →
dust2	13–11	0.04	25%	5 Jan →
ancient	13–8	0.19	14%	5 Jan →
inferno	9–5	0.20	29%	4 Jan →
inferno	4–9	-0.06	41%	4 Jan →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	26%	4 Jan →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	21%	4 Jan →
mirage	9–13	0.07	22%	4 Jan →
mirage	13–4	0.02	21%	4 Jan →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	28%	4 Jan →
mirage	10–13	0.07	35%	26 Dec →
dust2	13–7	0.05	20%	25 Dec →
mirage	11–13	0.15	21%	17 Dec →
inferno	4–13	0.12	24%	16 Dec →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	14%	14 Dec →
train	14–16	0.10	24%	26 Nov →
overpass	13–6	0.05	25%	26 Nov →
mirage	13–5	0.05	15%	26 Nov →
dust2	13–5	0.05	32%	26 Nov →
ancient	13–5	0.13	32%	26 Nov →