Hash[#]

Hash[#] — CS2 Stats

76561199113948101[U:1:1153682373]Steam profile ↗

5,722Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,980Purple band · top ~16.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12939 of 24624 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,956 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHash[#]FACEITLevel 10 · 2,956 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER17,980 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning60
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4654Last 10046%Win rateWWLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0
Aggression7.6
Utility5.8
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.0
Utility5.8
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time478ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 478ms
Headshot accuracy27.4%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 27.3% → last ⅓ avg 27.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–4
132Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 52% over 23anubisWeakest map · 35% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB32161650%-0.00
nukeB23121152%0.02
anubisC2381535%0.02
infernoC1771041%0.02
overpass42250%0.01
mirage110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,649Matches
51%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
81.2ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient102153%1.2017.3
Anubis67049%1.1717.0
Inferno51850%1.2717.6
Nuke50751%1.2818.2
Mirage37048%1.0314.5
Overpass12350%1.2517.2
Dust210043%0.9513.4
Vertigo5244%0.9514.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
476msReaction time
28.8%T opening success
55.8%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
6.39HE damage / grenade
10.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4932 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.8225% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–80.0529%22 Aug
anubis13–100.0021%22 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0525%22 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0916%22 Aug
nuke13–70.0641%22 Aug
inferno13–90.0834%21 Aug
ancient9–130.0429%21 Aug
anubis4–130.0922%21 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0433%21 Aug
ancient16–130.0428%19 Aug
anubis2–130.0224%19 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0820%19 Aug
ancient8–130.0423%16 Aug
nuke16–130.0726%15 Aug
nuke13–110.0419%15 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0134%14 Aug
ancient13–90.0626%14 Aug
nuke7–130.0437%14 Aug
nuke6–130.0636%13 Aug
nuke13–90.0422%13 Aug
anubis13–100.0429%13 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0536%12 Aug
inferno11–130.0633%12 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0424%12 Aug
ancient13–70.0424%12 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0422%12 Aug
anubis13–100.0421%7 Aug
ancient13–80.0827%7 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0224%7 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0229%7 Aug
nuke14–160.0827%7 Aug
nuke7–130.0832%2 Aug
inferno13–80.0630%2 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0127%1 Aug
inferno4–130.0331%1 Aug
inferno5–130.0332%1 Aug
ancient13–160.0318%1 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0631%1 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0022%1 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0429%23 Jul
ancient19–150.0324%22 Jul
nuke13–50.0023%22 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0624%16 Jul
ancient13–20.0212%15 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0123%15 Jul
ancient16–130.0123%14 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0617%13 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0118%8 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0322%6 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0818%1 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0418%28 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0136%27 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0622%25 Jun
nuke13–20.0124%22 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0342%22 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0433%21 Jun
anubis13–90.0524%9 Jun
nuke16–140.0138%7 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0732%5 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0717%3 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0121%3 Jun
nuke13–100.0436%1 Jun
inferno13–40.1319%30 May
ancient9–13-0.0112%25 May
ancient5–13-0.086%25 May
ancient13–70.0627%25 May
nuke5–13-0.0232%25 May
inferno13–40.0222%25 May
inferno13–8-0.0041%25 May
anubis4–130.0127%25 May
anubis6–13-0.0225%25 May
ancient8–130.0129%22 May
anubis4–130.0532%22 May
anubis13–90.0933%22 May
ancient19–170.0023%22 May
nuke5–13-0.0116%22 May
ancient13–10-0.0028%21 May
overpass13–10-0.0320%21 May
anubis5–13-0.0632%18 May
ancient13–11-0.0728%17 May
ancient16–140.0323%17 May
inferno10–13-0.0028%17 May
anubis13–100.0629%16 May
mirage13–6-0.0234%16 May
anubis13–100.0922%15 May
inferno11–130.0728%13 May
ancient4–13-0.0031%13 May
inferno5–13-0.0426%13 May
anubis9–130.0934%13 May
nuke13–80.0523%13 May
ancient13–80.0219%11 May
ancient6–130.0025%9 May
overpass13–50.0829%9 May
anubis7–130.0225%9 May
overpass9–130.0315%9 May
anubis13–90.0531%9 May
ancient16–120.0123%9 May
inferno13–70.0343%8 May
ancient16–130.0731%8 May
nuke7–13-0.0028%8 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →