bas

bas — CS2 Stats

ES76561199113658016[U:1:1153392288]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

188Tracked matches46%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbasFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning45
Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52417Last 10052%Win rateLLTWWWWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression5.9
Utility1.4
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch5.6

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.5
Utility1.4
Mechanics9.3
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact3.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time649ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%+5.8%
first ⅓ avg 9.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — anubis 13–2
131Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
310In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B37201754%-0.00
mirageB31151648%-0.01
nukeB147750%0.01
anubisS76186%0.04
infernoD62433%-0.00
ancient42250%-0.01
overpass1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

40Matches
48%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
64.6ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1765%0.8813.7
Dust2743%0.8510.7
Anubis667%0.9617.0
Ancient40%0.6610.8
Inferno333%0.569.3
Nuke20%0.7112.0
Overpass10%0.183.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
91.6%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
646msReaction time
23.8%T opening success
54.8%CT opening success
0.25Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
4.58HE damage / grenade
4.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2549 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.7941% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0412%8 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0320%8 Jun
dust212–12-0.019%8 Jun
mirage13–9-0.056%7 Jun
dust213–90.0117%28 Nov
mirage13–6-0.055%28 Nov
dust213–11-0.0416%27 Aug
anubis13–20.1626%24 Aug
dust212–12-0.117%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0610%17 Aug
dust210–13-0.0116%16 Aug
dust211–13-0.0131%16 Aug
dust213–50.0017%15 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0424%15 Aug
dust24–13-0.0620%15 Aug
dust212–12-0.0518%15 Aug
mirage11–13-0.035%14 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0227%14 Aug
dust25–13-0.0915%14 Aug
dust213–9-0.0011%14 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0615%14 Aug
dust29–13-0.0016%13 Aug
overpass4–13-0.1128%13 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0515%13 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0410%13 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0010%11 Aug
dust213–30.0217%11 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0119%10 Aug
dust213–40.0717%9 Aug
dust213–100.0020%9 Aug
mirage6–11-0.0413%7 Aug
dust213–8-0.029%7 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0015%6 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0415%6 Aug
dust213–5-0.0113%6 Aug
dust213–50.007%2 Aug
mirage13–100.057%2 Aug
mirage7–0-0.070%2 Aug
nuke9–130.047%2 Aug
mirage13–80.0611%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0411%22 Jul
dust213–100.006%22 Jul
dust213–90.0418%19 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0120%16 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0413%16 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0120%16 Jul
dust215–15-0.0618%16 Jul
dust20–9-0.0518%15 Jul
ancient16–120.038%14 Jul
mirage13–40.0216%14 Jul
dust27–130.0210%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0415%13 Jul
nuke8–10.0150%13 Jul
anubis13–60.0114%13 Jul
ancient13–1-0.0011%13 Jul
anubis13–90.0411%13 Jul
dust213–60.1013%13 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0227%13 Jul
nuke13–30.0620%12 Jul
dust211–130.0414%12 Jul
nuke10–130.008%11 Jul
nuke13–80.1020%11 Jul
dust211–13-0.0011%11 Jul
mirage13–80.0211%10 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0213%10 Jul
mirage1–00.010%10 Jul
anubis13–90.0212%10 Jul
nuke6–130.047%10 Jul
dust213–70.0912%10 Jul
nuke13–7-0.065%8 Jul
nuke14–160.018%4 Jul
dust213–100.0312%4 Jul
mirage11–130.019%4 Jul
anubis13–90.039%4 Jul
dust210–13-0.0211%3 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0211%3 Jul
mirage13–100.037%3 Jul
dust213–40.047%3 Jul
mirage13–80.014%2 Jul
dust213–90.028%2 Jul
inferno15–150.0514%2 Jul
mirage13–16-0.018%30 Jun
dust213–5-0.035%30 Jun
mirage16–14-0.029%26 Jun
dust23–13-0.1111%26 Jun
ancient8–13-0.042%26 Jun
inferno11–13-0.055%26 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0114%26 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0410%25 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0313%25 Jun
nuke7–10.0926%25 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0011%25 Jun
dust210–13-0.035%24 Jun
inferno13–40.0310%24 Jun
dust25–13-0.0118%23 Jun
anubis13–60.055%23 Jun
dust213–30.0813%23 Jun
dust213–30.0614%23 Jun
mirage10–130.036%23 Jun
mirage8–130.039%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →