Duli — CS2 Stats

76561199113328685[U:1:1153062957]1 game ban

976Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingClutch Specialist
CSDB Leaderboard#29296 of 29424 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 866 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

866Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 866
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 35 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDuliFACEITLevel 3 · 866 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO866csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning38
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY434413Last 10043%Win rateWLLLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim5.4
Aggression4.8
Utility2.1
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch8.0

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 725ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning3.8
Utility2.1
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact6.3

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time719ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 746ms → last ⅓ avg 719ms
Headshot accuracy30.2%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 31.0% → last ⅓ avg 30.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 8–1
131Biggest win — mirage
3Longest win streak
42In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 7mirageWeakest map · 39% over 75
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC75294639%-0.02
nukeA74357%-0.03
infernoB63350%-0.02
dust242250%0.02
vertigo31233%-0.02
cache220100%-0.03
anubis110100%-0.05
train1010%-0.00
overpass110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 75). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

64Matches
52%Win rate
0.67Avg K/D
71.0ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

60%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1155%0.7211.4
Nuke633%0.7612.5
Dust2475%1.2516.0
Inferno250%1.0816.5
Anubis1100%1.2211.0
Ancient1100%1.2823.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.6%Headshot accuracy
29.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
725msReaction time
28.9%T opening success
43.9%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
3.75HE damage / grenade
4.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 725.0171ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4505 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.9292% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 75 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–60.0145%29 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0918%28 Aug
mirage8–130.0216%28 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0828%27 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0214%27 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0321%27 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0925%27 Aug
mirage13–50.0340%27 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0332%25 Aug
mirage6–4-0.0243%25 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0349%23 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0817%23 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0844%19 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0215%17 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0327%16 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0346%16 Aug
inferno9–6-0.0235%16 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0927%7 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0929%7 Aug
vertigo13–70.0152%7 Aug
vertigo9–130.0132%7 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0513%4 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0431%4 Aug
cache13–60.0323%3 Aug
mirage13–100.0535%3 Aug
mirage10–130.0115%2 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0763%2 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0318%1 Aug
mirage13–80.0622%1 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0129%24 Jul
mirage1–130.0137%5 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0214%28 Jun
inferno6–130.0140%26 Jun
nuke13–100.0320%25 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0537%25 Jun
mirage5–130.0345%24 Jun
mirage5–130.0154%22 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0233%14 Jun
mirage13–10.0941%14 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0134%14 Jun
nuke13–3-0.0825%13 Jun
mirage3–8-0.0760%11 Jun
mirage2–7-0.1144%9 Jun
mirage1–130.0260%8 Jun
mirage4–2-0.0350%8 Jun
mirage13–11-0.1231%7 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0130%4 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0419%30 May
mirage3–13-0.0314%30 May
mirage13–8-0.0825%21 May
nuke7–13-0.0535%21 May
cache13–7-0.0926%21 May
mirage12–60.0331%9 May
inferno3–13-0.0816%3 May
mirage13–100.0431%25 Apr
mirage8–130.0443%25 Apr
mirage13–20.1236%24 Apr
dust213–40.0130%9 Apr
dust25–130.0521%9 Apr
nuke0–130.0224%9 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0421%5 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0526%29 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0428%28 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0527%22 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0722%22 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0627%21 Mar
dust22–13-0.0450%21 Mar
mirage13–80.0030%20 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0514%17 Mar
mirage1–13-0.1136%17 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0135%16 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0525%14 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0118%12 Mar
mirage13–70.0556%12 Mar
mirage5–130.0525%10 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0620%22 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0325%22 Feb
inferno16–13-0.0243%9 Feb
mirage12–12-0.0343%4 Feb
mirage12–12-0.0427%4 Feb
train7–13-0.0031%17 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0823%17 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0427%16 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0729%11 Jan
mirage8–10.1335%11 Jan
mirage13–9-0.1039%11 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0123%10 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0230%2 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0524%31 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0631%30 Dec
mirage9–130.0632%30 Dec
mirage12–120.0026%28 Dec
mirage13–90.0741%28 Dec
inferno2–130.0247%27 Dec
inferno13–5-0.0317%26 Dec
mirage13–50.1233%26 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0336%24 Dec
nuke13–3-0.0640%13 Dec
overpass13–80.0937%9 Dec
dust213–70.0625%5 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →