chicken fart balls — CS2 Stats

76561199103478504[U:1:1143212776]Steam profile ↗

1,643Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since

2,391Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.5 StrongHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,605Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2116 of 17544 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,754 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

25,605Peak Premier on CSDB

1,754Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,754
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 247 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 25,605
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,395 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-28
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	81.5%	52.8%	above
Shot accuracy	0.8%	13.7%	12.9% short
Kill/death ratio	3.35	1.08	above
Match win rate	47.7%	49.2%	1.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning52

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–40–5Last 10055%Win rateLWLWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9

Aggression5.6

Utility5.9

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels1.3

Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.2

Utility5.9

Mechanics9.3

Opening Duels1.4

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time592ms−37ms

first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms

Headshot accuracy27.8%−1.1%

first ⅓ avg 28.9% → last ⅓ avg 27.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — inferno 13–4

13–0Biggest win — dust2

13Longest win streak

3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 68% over 22cacheWeakest map · 43% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	25	13–12	52%	0.00
nuke	S	22	15–7	68%	-0.00
dust2	C	18	8–10	44%	-0.00
cache	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.00
anubis	B	6	3–3	50%	0.03
inferno	—	4	2–2	50%	0.09
ancient	—	4	4–0	100%	0.03
office	—	3	2–1	67%	0.07
train	—	2	2–0	100%	0.07
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

163,058Lifetime kills

3.35K/D · Top 1% of tracked players

2,352Matches

47.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players

81.5%Headshot % · Top 1% of tracked players

0.8%Shot accuracy

5,662MVPs

1,237Hours (in match)

1,986Bombs planted

813Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47126,784

Desert Eagle8,592

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,669

AWP6,530

P2000 / USP-S4,928

Glock-182,235

Galil AR1,043

SSG 08922

MP9739

FAMAS642

Lifetime map wins

4,881nuke

2,773dust2

2,526vertigo

1,147inferno

522office

514train

10lake

9safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

358Matches

54%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

81.6ADR

58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	130	54%	1.09	16.1
Dust2	64	52%	1.12	15.4
Nuke	59	63%	1.27	17.2
Anubis	38	63%	1.07	14.3
Ancient	29	41%	1.15	18.4
Vertigo	18	56%	1.00	16.4
Inferno	10	30%	1.02	15.7
Train	5	60%	0.99	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.5%Headshot accuracy

37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.0%Spray accuracy

91.8%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

579msReaction time

29.1%T opening success

41.4%CT opening success

0.79Enemies flashed / flash

5.7%Flash assists

9.74HE damage / grenade

7.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.0706% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	5–13	-0.08	13%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.08	37%	18 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	22%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.20	28%	17 Aug →
cache	3–11	-0.04	15%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	25%	17 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.00	27%	17 Aug →
office	13–9	0.10	59%	17 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.02	24%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	30%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	20%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.06	27%	16 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	19%	16 Aug →
train	13–5	0.01	24%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	25%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.06	21%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.07	54%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.03	22%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.03	32%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	16%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.12	40%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.23	36%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	15%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.10	23%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	23%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.10	25%	6 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.06	16%	6 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.07	28%	6 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.03	28%	5 Aug →
mirage	12–16	0.04	23%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	29%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	41%	4 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.10	50%	2 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	13%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.00	36%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.07	24%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	39%	30 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	27%	30 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.03	39%	30 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	33%	30 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	15%	30 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	17%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.01	31%	29 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	21%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.09	30%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.06	23%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	17%	28 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	18%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.12	28%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–2	-0.03	24%	25 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.00	17%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	27%	24 Jul →
nuke	12–12	-0.00	26%	22 Jul →
office	12–12	-0.03	63%	22 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	-0.06	33%	22 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	32%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–0	-0.07	30%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.04	16%	19 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.00	19%	19 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	27%	15 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.08	14%	15 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.01	30%	13 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	23%	13 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.04	29%	13 Jul →
office	13–0	0.15	66%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	20%	12 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	17%	11 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.03	40%	11 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.03	20%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	25%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.02	19%	11 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.03	26%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.08	30%	11 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.09	19%	10 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	40%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.02	22%	10 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.09	57%	10 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	15%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.02	16%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.03	27%	10 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	6%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.07	29%	9 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	27%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.07	30%	9 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	24%	9 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	21%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.07	21%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.01	24%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.02	31%	9 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	47%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.08	24%	9 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.02	33%	8 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.01	21%	8 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	32%	7 Jul →
vertigo	3–13	-0.04	42%	7 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.00	25%	7 Jul →
train	13–4	0.14	41%	7 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.02	16%	7 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.07	40%	6 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.10	63%	6 Jul →