Jug2g — CS2 Stats

76561199100720244[U:1:1140454516]

979Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,051 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJug2gFACEITLevel 8 · 2,051 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning61
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53452Last 10053%Win rateLLLLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression6.9
Utility3.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.1
Utility3.0
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time640ms+40ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms
Headshot accuracy26.2%−7.9%
first ⅓ avg 34.1% → last ⅓ avg 26.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — nuke 9–2
131Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A27151256%0.03
mirageB21101148%0.01
ancientS1611569%0.01
nukeB137654%0.03
infernoB84450%0.03
anubisD62433%0.03
cacheC52340%0.02
overpass42250%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

618Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
79.7ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17750%1.1516.6
Dust29254%1.1417.3
Inferno8054%1.2116.9
Anubis7948%1.1316.6
Ancient6853%1.0715.9
Nuke3669%1.2417.9
Vertigo3037%1.0616.6
Train825%0.8813.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.6%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.4%Spray accuracy
90.2%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
624msReaction time
31.7%T opening success
58.9%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
8.15HE damage / grenade
3.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3164 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.6906% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–130.0129%29 Aug
cache11–130.0325%27 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0123%26 Aug
dust27–13-0.0123%25 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0129%19 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0638%16 Aug
cache7–13-0.0215%15 Aug
mirage10–130.0129%11 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0030%9 Aug
cache0–10-0.0421%4 Aug
ancient13–50.0228%4 Aug
dust215–15-0.0132%4 Aug
ancient16–140.0124%3 Aug
cache13–80.0324%3 Aug
dust213–50.0518%2 Aug
dust213–70.0412%24 Jun
ancient16–140.1138%24 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0820%23 Jun
mirage5–130.0212%22 Jun
dust213–80.0631%21 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0640%20 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0816%20 Jun
cache13–70.1130%8 May
ancient13–70.0429%21 Apr
dust213–110.0131%26 Mar
nuke13–60.0331%24 Mar
dust24–13-0.0417%22 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0227%22 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0216%7 Mar
mirage7–2-0.0156%6 Mar
dust24–130.0223%4 Mar
ancient13–110.0827%27 Feb
dust29–130.0220%7 Jan
nuke5–13-0.0626%31 Dec
mirage13–30.0833%29 Dec
inferno8–130.0031%29 Dec
nuke13–70.0531%28 Dec
nuke13–90.0221%28 Dec
overpass6–130.0353%23 Dec
dust25–130.0034%20 Dec
mirage13–70.0942%19 Dec
mirage7–13-0.0137%19 Dec
ancient13–40.0222%19 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0533%18 Dec
dust213–40.0524%18 Dec
overpass3–13-0.0643%15 Dec
ancient13–100.0034%9 Dec
dust213–90.0725%26 Nov
ancient13–90.0844%22 Nov
nuke13–30.0333%11 Nov
dust213–10-0.0033%7 Nov
mirage13–7-0.0226%6 Nov
dust28–13-0.0054%4 Nov
mirage8–13-0.0028%2 Nov
ancient6–13-0.0129%23 Oct
inferno13–100.0243%17 Oct
mirage5–13-0.0343%4 Oct
overpass13–110.0534%13 Aug
dust29–13-0.0436%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0638%3 Aug
nuke13–60.0533%31 Jul
dust213–80.0447%30 Jul
overpass13–40.0639%28 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0029%10 Jul
anubis11–130.0643%5 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0235%26 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0316%16 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0527%14 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0728%13 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0216%12 Jun
dust213–110.0334%11 Jun
mirage13–80.0029%11 Jun
inferno12–160.0027%3 Jun
dust213–50.0852%2 Jun
nuke8–130.0850%2 Jun
anubis3–130.0927%2 Jun
dust213–9-0.0421%2 Jun
inferno13–40.1124%2 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0136%2 Jun
nuke9–50.0939%29 May
nuke9–20.2155%29 May
mirage13–50.1956%26 May
dust25–8-0.0317%25 May
dust213–40.0720%24 May
ancient9–13-0.0133%23 May
mirage13–9-0.0342%23 May
inferno9–130.0233%22 May
dust213–80.0841%22 May
dust213–70.0446%22 May
dust215–150.0833%22 May
mirage13–40.0730%21 May
inferno6–130.0225%21 May
nuke8–130.0344%21 May
dust213–10.1343%20 May
anubis13–40.1237%19 May
mirage7–13-0.0336%19 May
dust24–130.0033%18 May
inferno13–50.0947%18 May
mirage13–4-0.0522%17 May
dust29–130.0423%16 May

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →