SWANKY — CS2 Stats

76561199100638030[U:1:1140372302]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

923Tracked matches34%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.3 Learning

Premier CS Rating5,189Light Blue band · top ~77.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#16547 of 21607 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim38

Positioning39

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–56–3Last 10041%Win rateWLWWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.8

Aggression3.3

Utility5.6

Positioning3.9

Opening Duels1.2

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.8

Positioning3.9

Utility5.6

Mechanics4.7

Opening Duels1.7

Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time619ms−42ms

first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms

Headshot accuracy13.5%+1.6%

first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–5

13–1Biggest win — cache

4Longest win streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 10dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	C	20	7–13	35%	-0.02
inferno	B	20	9–11	45%	-0.02
cache	C	18	8–10	44%	-0.03
mirage	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.04
ancient	S	10	7–3	70%	0.02
dust2	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.06
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.02
poseidon	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.10
office	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.07
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches

50%Win rate

0.63Avg K/D

73.8ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	2	0%	0.60	9.5
Ancient	1	100%	0.71	17.0
Inferno	1	100%	0.62	10.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.7%Headshot accuracy

31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.5%Spray accuracy

71.0%Counter-strafing

12.1°Preaim

617msReaction time

25.8%T opening success

43.5%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

2.6%Flash assists

8.74HE damage / grenade

11.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 12.0714° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.6729% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–7	0.02	13%	29 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	8%	29 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.07	21%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	18%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.09	7%	28 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.03	11%	28 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.02	6%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	17%	26 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.00	17%	24 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.03	12%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	8%	22 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	11%	22 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	17%	20 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	7%	20 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.07	10%	20 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.03	10%	20 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	17%	20 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.11	5%	19 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	2%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.03	13%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	13%	18 Aug →
vertigo	9–4	0.03	12%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.00	16%	18 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	21%	18 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.05	19%	18 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	12%	17 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.10	15%	16 Aug →
inferno	4–9	-0.04	22%	16 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	13%	16 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.01	23%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	13%	15 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.10	11%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.08	24%	14 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	8%	14 Aug →
inferno	11–1	0.03	11%	14 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.02	14%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	19%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.07	10%	8 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	13%	7 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	17%	7 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.04	17%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.04	11%	5 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.08	11%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.03	16%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	10%	4 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	10%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	13%	3 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.09	5%	3 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.05	9%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.12	20%	3 Aug →
mirage	5–9	0.02	17%	3 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	28%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	10%	2 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.07	10%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.05	20%	1 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.12	10%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	22%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.01	13%	26 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.08	9%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.02	10%	22 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	24%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.06	8%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.05	13%	19 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	9%	19 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.01	17%	19 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.10	24%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.04	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.05	14%	18 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	8%	17 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.06	24%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.01	24%	17 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	15%	17 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.01	17%	17 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	9%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.06	8%	16 Jul →
office	8–13	-0.07	12%	13 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.01	10%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	6%	11 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.01	10%	11 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	12%	11 Jul →
fachwerk	13–3	0.04	15%	9 Jul →
shelter	6–13	-0.05	9%	9 Jul →
boulder	13–5	0.06	9%	9 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.05	9%	8 Jul →
vertigo	7–13	-0.05	14%	8 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.01	14%	8 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.02	8%	8 Jul →
office	9–13	0.02	15%	3 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.05	13%	3 Jul →
poseidon	3–9	-0.17	14%	3 Jul →
poseidon	8–8	-0.02	9%	3 Jul →
overpass	4–9	-0.06	8%	3 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.04	23%	1 Jul →
poseidon	8–8	-0.11	10%	1 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	3%	28 Jun →
overpass	7–13	-0.08	9%	28 Jun →
nuke	5–2	-0.02	0%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	11%	28 Jun →
vertigo	1–13	-0.04	17%	27 Jun →
cache	13–1	-0.06	12%	27 Jun →