JAGx_x007

JAGx_x007 — CS2 Stats

76561198872852261[U:1:912586533]Steam profile ↗

145Tracked matches30%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating2.9 Learning
Premier CS Rating2,876Grey band · top ~87.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14111 of 18173 tracked
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJAGx_x007PREMIER2,876 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim39
Positioning45
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD32653Last 10032%Win rateWLLWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.9
Aggression4.2
Utility3.5
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 63% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.9
Positioning4.5
Utility3.5
Mechanics3.0
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 2.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time623ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 682ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy13.7%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — vertigo 9–2
130Biggest win — mirage
3Longest win streak
210In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 43% over 14dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC26101638%-0.03
nukeC1971237%-0.03
infernoD1941521%-0.05
mirageC146843%-0.03
ancientD72529%-0.05
dust2D61517%-0.02
anubis4040%-0.03
debris2020%-0.11
vertigo110100%0.20
poseidon110100%0.06
overpass1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.0%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
63.4%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
635msReaction time
28.4%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
10.77HE damage / grenade
5.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.9756% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.4343% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–80.0410%28 Aug
mirage10–130.0220%28 Aug
cache8–130.0218%28 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0411%28 Aug
nuke6–13-0.056%28 Aug
anubis14–16-0.065%27 Aug
nuke13–11-0.040%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0713%26 Aug
inferno7–90.009%26 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0917%24 Aug
anubis11–130.019%24 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0421%24 Aug
inferno3–13-0.074%24 Aug
mirage13–80.0817%23 Aug
cache13–10-0.0112%23 Aug
ancient4–13-0.042%23 Aug
cache13–100.0112%22 Aug
nuke13–100.0915%22 Aug
nuke9–13-0.019%22 Aug
debris3–9-0.150%22 Aug
ancient5–13-0.1011%9 Aug
inferno5–9-0.049%9 Aug
inferno8–80.0313%9 Aug
dust214–160.0217%8 Aug
dust26–13-0.0817%7 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0413%7 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0642%6 Aug
inferno3–9-0.200%6 Aug
debris5–9-0.078%5 Aug
cache6–13-0.120%5 Aug
ancient13–3-0.035%5 Aug
inferno0–3-0.04100%4 Aug
nuke6–13-0.1110%4 Aug
mirage13–4-0.036%4 Aug
vertigo9–20.204%3 Aug
nuke9–10.0022%3 Aug
inferno1–13-0.107%3 Aug
cache2–13-0.026%3 Aug
inferno13–50.064%3 Aug
cache1–13-0.116%1 Aug
mirage4–13-0.110%26 Jul
dust25–13-0.077%19 Jul
cache16–13-0.0811%19 Jul
dust21–13-0.0524%19 Jul
nuke13–60.018%19 Jul
mirage13–60.014%18 Jul
cache8–13-0.018%8 Jul
cache6–13-0.0319%8 Jul
cache8–13-0.0513%3 Jul
cache10–13-0.0214%1 Jul
cache2–30.087%27 Jun
nuke11–130.015%27 Jun
cache13–8-0.0611%27 Jun
cache8–13-0.0410%27 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0613%19 Jun
cache6–13-0.059%19 Jun
cache13–5-0.0813%17 Jun
cache1–4-0.020%17 Jun
cache13–9-0.039%13 Jun
cache11–130.049%13 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0525%23 May
anubis4–13-0.0125%23 May
cache13–20.0417%23 May
mirage12–12-0.0314%23 May
cache6–13-0.0620%23 May
inferno6–9-0.1212%21 May
cache13–90.0016%21 May
cache8–13-0.0611%4 May
cache13–6-0.0013%4 May
inferno1–9-0.1917%2 May
inferno9–70.089%2 May
cache13–6-0.0826%2 May
cache7–13-0.025%2 May
nuke8–8-0.1012%28 Apr
poseidon9–40.0611%12 Apr
nuke9–13-0.1312%7 Apr
inferno2–9-0.0620%6 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0416%27 Mar
dust213–50.0916%27 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0625%26 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0715%21 Mar
inferno8–13-0.048%21 Mar
ancient2–13-0.074%21 Mar
nuke4–13-0.038%21 Mar
inferno11–13-0.096%18 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0311%17 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0610%17 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0112%17 Mar
nuke2–10-0.0412%17 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0415%13 Mar
ancient7–13-0.043%10 Mar
inferno13–10-0.076%9 Mar
overpass0–13-0.079%4 Mar
mirage13–00.0512%3 Mar
inferno13–16-0.075%2 Mar
dust29–13-0.0010%26 Feb
nuke16–12-0.0427%25 Feb
nuke6–13-0.088%18 Feb
inferno13–6-0.002%18 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0417%18 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →