HadesQueens — CS2 Stats

76561199099445745[U:1:1139180017]

733Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.3 Learning
Premier CS Rating6,792Light Blue band · top ~70.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#34551 of 45928 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHadesQueensFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER6,792 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim30
Positioning41
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46495Last 10046%Win rateLLWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.0
Aggression4.6
Utility3.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 663ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.0
Positioning4.1
Utility3.4
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time653ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 703ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms
Headshot accuracy13.8%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–5
132Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
115In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B27131448%-0.01
mirageB23111248%0.00
nukeC1761135%-0.03
infernoB115645%-0.02
ancientS86275%-0.00
anubisD72529%-0.03
cacheB63350%-0.01
overpass1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

16Matches
25%Win rate
0.48Avg K/D
ADR
30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Overpass20%0.608.5
Inferno10%0.7512.0
Mirage10%0.336.0
Anubis10%0.647.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy
26.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.4%Spray accuracy
69.4%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
663msReaction time
23.6%T opening success
41.4%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
11.29HE damage / grenade
3.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.5167% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4848 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.5892% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–11-0.024%30 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0513%30 Aug
nuke13–90.0119%30 Aug
dust23–13-0.0423%30 Aug
ancient13–110.0114%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0510%26 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0911%26 Aug
inferno13–60.0020%24 Aug
mirage13–11-0.063%24 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0111%12 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0115%12 Aug
mirage13–70.0411%12 Aug
cache3–110.0120%12 Aug
mirage3–12-0.0310%12 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0717%9 Aug
dust213–6-0.0311%9 Aug
mirage13–30.0317%9 Aug
ancient13–110.0618%9 Aug
dust213–60.0725%9 Aug
cache16–12-0.0215%6 Aug
dust211–130.0110%4 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0121%1 Aug
dust29–13-0.066%1 Aug
cache13–5-0.019%30 Jul
mirage13–110.038%28 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0115%27 Jul
dust210–13-0.0623%27 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0311%26 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0513%26 Jul
anubis9–13-0.018%26 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0816%26 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0619%25 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0111%25 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0215%23 Jul
dust213–9-0.0419%23 Jul
dust216–13-0.0412%22 Jul
cache3–13-0.0211%20 Jul
mirage13–30.029%18 Jul
ancient13–11-0.035%18 Jul
dust213–7-0.0515%18 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0120%18 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0712%12 Jul
dust211–130.0015%12 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0512%12 Jul
dust27–13-0.098%12 Jul
nuke2–13-0.1010%12 Jul
dust25–13-0.0623%12 Jul
mirage15–150.1112%10 Jul
mirage13–70.0914%10 Jul
cache15–15-0.0213%10 Jul
anubis13–2-0.0321%10 Jul
cache13–40.0111%10 Jul
inferno10–130.0313%6 Jul
mirage13–50.1212%6 Jul
mirage4–13-0.109%6 Jul
nuke13–80.0315%5 Jul
dust213–90.0113%5 Jul
dust213–100.0615%5 Jul
nuke10–130.0211%5 Jul
inferno13–110.049%5 Jul
inferno6–130.0212%5 Jul
nuke13–110.0412%5 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0114%5 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0111%4 Jul
dust213–30.047%4 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0716%3 Jul
nuke5–13-0.056%3 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0311%3 Jul
nuke7–13-0.049%2 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0411%30 Jun
dust26–13-0.058%30 Jun
inferno9–13-0.074%30 Jun
mirage16–14-0.028%29 Jun
inferno3–13-0.115%29 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0713%29 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0115%28 Jun
dust216–120.0313%28 Jun
mirage9–130.018%27 Jun
anubis8–13-0.057%27 Jun
ancient13–90.019%24 Jun
dust213–20.0820%23 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0223%23 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0011%23 Jun
dust213–90.0414%22 Jun
dust25–13-0.0620%22 Jun
dust213–70.0111%21 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0219%21 Jun
dust215–15-0.0411%20 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0311%20 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0225%20 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0512%20 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0711%18 Jun
ancient13–100.0213%18 Jun
anubis13–110.036%18 Jun
mirage3–130.018%18 Jun
mirage10–13-0.015%17 Jun
dust212–5-0.029%17 Jun
dust211–130.0314%16 Jun
nuke13–60.0519%16 Jun
dust29–13-0.0410%15 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →