JackSparrow

JackSparrow — CS2 Stats

76561199095201610[U:1:1134935882]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,045Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,590Blue band · top ~41.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19293 of 27949 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJackSparrowFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,590 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning35
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56368Last 10056%Win rateWLLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression3.4
Utility5.5
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 662ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning3.5
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time658ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 655ms → last ⅓ avg 658ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — eldorado 7–9
131Biggest win — ancient
12Longest win streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 88% over 8anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A27171063%-0.00
cacheA169756%0.00
mirageB126650%0.00
ancientD93633%-0.01
nukeS87188%0.02
infernoS87188%0.01
anubisD72529%-0.01
officeC52340%0.01
overpass21150%-0.03
train2020%-0.02
eldorado21150%0.11
vertigo110100%0.00
boulder1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

157Matches
48%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
70.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4747%1.1914.2
Dust24141%0.9214.4
Nuke1644%0.8212.5
Inferno1362%1.0016.3
Overpass1267%1.1611.8
Ancient1050%0.9616.4
Anubis838%1.0215.3
Cache838%0.9615.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
662msReaction time
19.5%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
7.82HE damage / grenade
16.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4761 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.5089% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–5-0.0120%27 Aug
overpass8–13-0.085%27 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0410%27 Aug
train9–13-0.0518%27 Aug
train1–70.0223%24 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0210%23 Aug
dust22–5-0.0313%22 Aug
cache1–13-0.0518%22 Aug
cache13–2-0.030%22 Aug
dust213–9-0.109%22 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0018%22 Aug
dust213–8-0.0613%21 Aug
dust212–120.0320%21 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0214%21 Aug
anubis2–13-0.1213%15 Aug
dust212–12-0.0122%15 Aug
cache7–13-0.1037%15 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0710%15 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0117%15 Aug
dust25–13-0.0612%12 Aug
vertigo13–100.0016%10 Aug
cache3–9-0.0527%6 Aug
cache9–130.0123%6 Aug
dust29–13-0.0419%6 Aug
cache13–8-0.0324%5 Aug
dust213–11-0.0210%2 Aug
cache8–130.0517%30 Jul
dust213–70.0322%30 Jul
cache9–130.0738%29 Jul
nuke13–80.1010%29 Jul
anubis12–120.0426%29 Jul
cache13–30.0233%29 Jul
cache13–60.0720%29 Jul
inferno13–90.0313%29 Jul
dust213–90.0624%29 Jul
inferno13–50.0820%28 Jul
nuke13–90.0815%28 Jul
ancient13–10.0523%28 Jul
dust213–5-0.0414%28 Jul
dust213–80.0316%28 Jul
dust213–40.0729%28 Jul
dust213–70.069%27 Jul
inferno13–100.0619%27 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0120%26 Jul
mirage13–110.0220%26 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0423%26 Jul
eldorado7–90.1816%26 Jul
eldorado9–60.0312%26 Jul
dust213–60.0213%25 Jul
dust23–13-0.0319%25 Jul
mirage14–160.0112%25 Jul
dust213–60.0813%25 Jul
inferno6–13-0.070%24 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0629%24 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0327%23 Jul
office13–11-0.0129%23 Jul
office13–70.0737%23 Jul
boulder7–13-0.0137%23 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0521%23 Jul
dust213–90.0113%23 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0320%23 Jul
anubis13–80.0924%22 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0132%22 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0217%20 Jul
cache13–90.0624%20 Jul
anubis4–130.0411%20 Jul
ancient8–130.0319%19 Jul
nuke13–50.1210%19 Jul
dust213–30.0822%19 Jul
inferno13–80.0320%19 Jul
mirage10–130.059%19 Jul
overpass13–70.0212%16 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0415%16 Jul
cache13–7-0.0213%16 Jul
dust25–13-0.0323%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.0419%15 Jul
mirage13–110.0617%15 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0611%15 Jul
dust27–13-0.0222%15 Jul
office12–12-0.0329%14 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0520%14 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0213%14 Jul
dust216–140.0318%14 Jul
dust213–11-0.0310%14 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0214%13 Jul
cache13–100.0117%12 Jul
dust213–16-0.0415%12 Jul
dust213–4-0.0119%12 Jul
mirage2–12-0.0216%12 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0026%11 Jul
dust213–11-0.0125%11 Jul
inferno13–90.0016%10 Jul
cache11–130.0114%10 Jul
mirage15–150.0714%9 Jul
office9–13-0.0316%9 Jul
cache13–40.0632%8 Jul
office12–120.0416%8 Jul
mirage13–70.0121%7 Jul
nuke13–100.0124%7 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0328%7 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →