Pho

Pho — CS2 Stats

JP76561199093676695[U:1:1133410967]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

789Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating19,446Purple band · top ~10.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10030 of 21547 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,356 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPhoFACEITLevel 6 · 1,356 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,446 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning50
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateWWWWLLTLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9
Aggression6.0
Utility5.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.0
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time572ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–9
131Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 54% over 28anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B28151354%0.01
nukeB20101050%-0.01
infernoB189950%0.01
cacheB158753%0.01
anubisD93633%0.00
ancientB63350%-0.01
mirage41325%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

209Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
79.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust27254%1.0415.9
Nuke3447%1.1016.4
Mirage2832%0.9115.2
Inferno2658%0.9615.4
Anubis2471%0.9813.9
Ancient1242%0.9912.1
Train50%0.8716.0
Cache540%0.9818.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
574msReaction time
25.1%T opening success
51.4%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
7.66HE damage / grenade
7.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.1129% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0011%28 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0215%28 Aug
dust213–6-0.0425%28 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0211%28 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0218%27 Aug
anubis14–16-0.059%26 Aug
dust215–15-0.0322%26 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0310%26 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0315%25 Aug
anubis7–130.0124%25 Aug
cache13–10.1235%24 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0612%24 Aug
dust213–90.1326%24 Aug
dust27–130.0118%23 Aug
cache13–60.0316%23 Aug
ancient8–13-0.017%23 Aug
mirage13–70.0823%23 Aug
inferno13–110.0212%22 Aug
cache13–50.0317%22 Aug
dust27–13-0.0224%21 Aug
cache16–130.0225%21 Aug
cache11–13-0.0221%21 Aug
dust213–60.0427%21 Aug
nuke7–130.0515%20 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0314%20 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0022%20 Aug
dust213–80.0427%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.0421%20 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0513%20 Aug
cache16–14-0.0524%19 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0213%19 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0311%19 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0213%18 Aug
dust210–130.0319%18 Aug
cache13–40.0621%18 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0411%18 Aug
nuke13–100.0424%18 Aug
cache15–15-0.0312%18 Aug
ancient13–70.039%18 Aug
cache4–13-0.0617%18 Aug
inferno9–130.0910%17 Aug
inferno13–50.0823%17 Aug
dust213–70.0519%16 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0718%16 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0210%16 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0215%16 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0313%16 Aug
cache6–130.0211%16 Aug
cache7–130.0111%15 Aug
dust213–7-0.0123%15 Aug
dust213–100.0324%15 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0228%15 Aug
dust213–10.0253%15 Aug
nuke16–19-0.039%14 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0423%14 Aug
inferno13–4-0.038%14 Aug
anubis6–130.0016%13 Aug
dust213–7-0.0118%13 Aug
dust213–100.0625%13 Aug
dust213–80.0336%12 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0414%12 Aug
nuke13–90.0322%12 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0721%12 Aug
cache11–130.0516%12 Aug
dust28–13-0.0415%12 Aug
dust213–110.0420%12 Aug
dust29–13-0.0416%11 Aug
inferno9–13-0.069%11 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0329%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.0126%11 Aug
nuke13–50.0712%10 Aug
inferno13–110.0325%10 Aug
cache13–11-0.0111%10 Aug
dust213–50.0217%10 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0013%10 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0321%10 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0726%9 Aug
inferno8–130.0211%9 Aug
dust24–130.0243%8 Aug
inferno8–130.019%8 Aug
dust28–130.0117%8 Aug
dust213–100.0115%8 Aug
cache13–16-0.0222%7 Aug
dust213–80.0336%7 Aug
inferno13–90.0226%7 Aug
cache13–8-0.0117%7 Aug
dust211–13-0.0319%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.018%6 Aug
inferno12–160.0333%6 Aug
nuke9–130.0220%6 Aug
anubis13–30.0833%6 Aug
nuke13–30.037%6 Aug
inferno13–90.0415%6 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0415%6 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0117%6 Aug
ancient13–40.049%6 Aug
dust24–13-0.0218%5 Aug
dust28–13-0.017%5 Aug
inferno13–90.0719%5 Aug
anubis13–10.0321%5 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →