Hard Ɑ͞ ̶͞ ̶͞ ̶͞ لں͞

Hard Ɑ͞ ̶͞ ̶͞ ̶͞ لں͞ — CS2 Stats

AT76561199091860393[U:1:1131594665]Steam profile ↗

583Tracked matches47%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,868Blue band · top ~45% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12385 of 17405 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHard Ɑ͞ ̶͞ ̶͞ ̶͞ لں͞FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER11,868 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning59
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49483Last 10049%Win rateLLLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression7.3
Utility3.0
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.9
Utility3.0
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time591ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 13–2
130Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C29121741%-0.01
mirageA22121055%-0.00
nukeC1771041%0.01
ancientB126650%0.02
infernoA117464%0.01
anubisC52340%-0.02
cache43175%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

61Matches
39%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
80.4ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1932%0.7712.2
Nuke1275%0.9316.5
Vertigo70%0.8716.4
Inferno633%0.8213.3
Dust2633%0.9114.5
Anubis540%1.0516.8
Ancient450%0.9618.0
Train250%1.1011.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
71.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
575msReaction time
40.2%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
2.21HE damage / grenade
5.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4539 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.0622%27 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0311%27 Aug
dust25–13-0.0227%27 Aug
ancient11–130.0518%27 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0320%26 Aug
dust26–13-0.0120%26 Aug
dust213–11-0.0120%26 Aug
cache13–7-0.0116%26 Aug
mirage4–130.0310%25 Aug
ancient11–130.0418%25 Aug
dust213–110.0623%25 Aug
nuke14–160.0115%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0118%25 Aug
nuke13–30.1113%20 Aug
dust216–14-0.0716%20 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0912%19 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0616%19 Aug
dust211–130.0217%18 Aug
mirage13–80.0914%18 Aug
ancient13–40.019%18 Aug
mirage13–40.0718%18 Aug
nuke10–13-0.048%18 Aug
mirage13–00.1118%13 Aug
inferno9–30.0719%13 Aug
nuke1–9-0.1717%13 Aug
ancient13–80.0112%13 Aug
dust211–13-0.0111%13 Aug
nuke13–90.0516%13 Aug
cache13–110.0525%12 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0617%12 Aug
inferno13–80.0213%12 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0015%9 Aug
mirage10–130.1214%9 Aug
nuke13–50.048%9 Aug
dust29–130.0312%8 Aug
ancient13–60.0316%8 Aug
dust213–7-0.0122%8 Aug
nuke13–60.1215%8 Aug
mirage13–8-0.028%8 Aug
dust29–130.0118%8 Aug
dust27–13-0.046%7 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0217%7 Aug
nuke7–130.0019%7 Aug
dust213–60.076%7 Aug
dust25–130.0013%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.069%6 Aug
nuke4–130.0113%6 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0010%5 Aug
dust213–8-0.032%5 Aug
ancient9–130.0711%5 Aug
mirage13–110.0211%5 Aug
ancient11–130.0713%5 Aug
nuke10–13-0.049%4 Aug
mirage5–13-0.170%31 Jul
dust211–130.0111%20 Jul
dust26–13-0.0910%20 Jul
nuke9–130.0411%20 Jul
mirage13–110.0718%20 Jul
ancient13–90.0318%20 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0312%20 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0718%20 Jul
dust29–13-0.0717%19 Jul
nuke13–90.0520%19 Jul
anubis13–70.0212%19 Jul
inferno13–20.1516%19 Jul
mirage10–13-0.047%18 Jul
dust216–13-0.0719%18 Jul
nuke12–120.1016%17 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0117%17 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0020%17 Jul
mirage10–130.0213%16 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0613%16 Jul
dust216–130.0317%16 Jul
dust213–8-0.026%16 Jul
dust213–10-0.0112%16 Jul
mirage13–60.0215%16 Jul
dust28–130.0013%16 Jul
nuke13–40.0222%16 Jul
ancient13–100.0313%16 Jul
inferno13–20.015%16 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0411%16 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0511%15 Jul
inferno8–130.017%15 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0219%15 Jul
cache13–60.068%15 Jul
cache5–13-0.0111%15 Jul
mirage13–70.0413%15 Jul
dust23–13-0.037%15 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0611%14 Jul
dust213–16-0.0410%14 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0315%14 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0315%14 Jul
dust28–13-0.0218%14 Jul
dust213–10-0.0013%14 Jul
nuke10–13-0.054%14 Jul
dust216–12-0.0212%14 Jul
mirage13–7-0.064%14 Jul
dust210–13-0.0416%14 Jul
ancient13–90.0114%14 Jul
inferno12–120.0414%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →