BRICK OWENS

BRICK OWENS — CS2 Stats

76561199091389073[U:1:1131123345]Steam profile ↗

352Tracked matches50%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.9 Learning
Premier CS Rating8,040Light Blue band · top ~64.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26332 of 35269 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBRICK OWENSPREMIER8,040 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning46
Utility16

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40564Last 10040%Win rateWLWWLWLWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0
Aggression5.6
Utility1.6
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.6
Utility1.6
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time664ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 731ms → last ⅓ avg 664ms
Headshot accuracy11.9%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 11.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–7
130Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30151550%-0.03
dust2C26111542%-0.03
infernoD1431121%-0.03
ancientB115645%-0.02
nukeD92722%-0.04
overpassA53260%-0.01
anubis41325%-0.00
cache1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.1%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
659msReaction time
37.9%T opening success
37.4%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
1.90HE damage / grenade
1.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.0595% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 1.3713 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.9388% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–14-0.038%15 May
cache9–13-0.0711%6 May
ancient13–60.0212%4 May
mirage13–110.0617%4 May
overpass11–13-0.058%4 May
mirage13–10-0.088%3 May
dust210–13-0.0821%3 May
mirage16–13-0.0415%19 Apr
dust215–15-0.0719%18 Apr
mirage13–7-0.026%18 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0813%18 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0110%1 Apr
ancient13–8-0.007%1 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0518%31 Mar
dust26–13-0.0714%31 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0510%28 Mar
dust27–13-0.0813%28 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0010%28 Mar
dust24–13-0.0710%25 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0212%25 Mar
dust214–16-0.065%25 Mar
anubis8–13-0.063%25 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0010%25 Mar
dust213–70.1213%25 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0015%23 Mar
mirage13–3-0.0528%22 Mar
mirage13–7-0.105%22 Mar
dust214–160.0114%22 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0315%21 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0512%20 Mar
ancient11–13-0.034%19 Mar
inferno10–13-0.079%18 Mar
overpass13–40.0416%14 Mar
dust216–13-0.034%14 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0212%14 Mar
ancient3–13-0.024%11 Mar
inferno4–13-0.117%11 Mar
mirage13–8-0.026%11 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0710%10 Mar
dust216–14-0.0616%8 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0219%8 Mar
nuke7–13-0.036%23 Feb
inferno11–130.0316%23 Feb
anubis13–20.0513%23 Feb
dust213–70.0226%22 Feb
dust27–130.0613%22 Feb
nuke13–16-0.0114%20 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0612%20 Feb
inferno4–130.0220%20 Feb
mirage8–130.0318%20 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0316%20 Feb
mirage13–70.1519%19 Feb
inferno11–130.0413%19 Feb
dust25–13-0.1018%19 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0114%19 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0913%16 Feb
dust24–13-0.0110%15 Feb
mirage15–15-0.075%15 Feb
nuke13–00.059%15 Feb
dust22–13-0.067%15 Feb
dust29–13-0.046%14 Feb
inferno13–10-0.078%14 Feb
anubis4–13-0.038%14 Feb
dust213–16-0.0821%14 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0818%14 Feb
inferno11–130.0013%14 Feb
mirage9–130.0424%14 Feb
nuke3–13-0.1413%14 Feb
dust213–5-0.0511%13 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0811%13 Feb
dust213–8-0.0520%13 Feb
mirage5–13-0.059%13 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0317%13 Feb
mirage10–13-0.1021%11 Feb
inferno15–15-0.0223%10 Feb
dust25–13-0.0323%10 Feb
inferno8–13-0.075%10 Feb
ancient6–13-0.089%8 Feb
dust213–60.0525%8 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0014%8 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0412%8 Feb
dust213–80.0929%8 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0820%8 Feb
overpass13–90.038%8 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0211%8 Feb
mirage6–130.0021%8 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0110%8 Feb
nuke13–16-0.0113%7 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0515%7 Feb
dust213–6-0.0833%7 Feb
mirage13–20.0821%6 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0714%6 Feb
dust29–10.0317%6 Feb
dust213–7-0.0023%6 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0313%6 Feb
dust29–13-0.0927%6 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0118%4 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0113%4 Feb
anubis7–130.0312%4 Feb
nuke13–7-0.027%3 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →