Fidel Cashflow — CS2 Stats

76561199062070904[U:1:1101805176]✓ No bans

543Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17342 of 27493 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFidel CashflowPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning45
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51454Last 10051%Win rateWLLLTLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression4.7
Utility2.0
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.5

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.5
Utility2.0
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time640ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms
Headshot accuracy12.9%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 12.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 13–6
133Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
125In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 18infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28151354%0.02
dust2S1812667%-0.01
cacheC167944%0.01
nukeB157847%-0.00
ancientA95456%-0.04
anubisC73443%0.00
infernoD62433%0.00
overpass1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
636msReaction time
35.7%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
7.26HE damage / grenade
1.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.119% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3882 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.715% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–50.068%31 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0015%29 Jul
cache11–13-0.0112%29 Jul
cache4–130.019%28 Jul
dust215–15-0.0624%28 Jul
cache8–130.0614%27 Jul
cache13–110.0121%27 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0311%27 Jul
nuke13–90.007%26 Jul
mirage9–130.0215%26 Jul
mirage13–110.0719%25 Jul
cache13–90.068%25 Jul
mirage13–90.0414%25 Jul
dust27–13-0.0316%25 Jul
dust213–60.117%24 Jul
mirage2–13-0.023%24 Jul
cache13–70.0213%24 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0512%24 Jul
ancient13–10-0.056%24 Jul
mirage13–100.0914%22 Jul
nuke13–110.0314%21 Jul
mirage8–130.017%21 Jul
anubis13–110.0112%21 Jul
cache6–10-0.0321%20 Jul
nuke13–110.038%20 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0316%20 Jul
mirage9–130.0620%19 Jul
cache13–70.0519%19 Jul
mirage13–50.009%19 Jul
cache5–13-0.0212%18 Jul
mirage13–70.0616%18 Jul
cache9–13-0.0111%17 Jul
dust213–11-0.0212%17 Jul
cache7–130.0813%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0511%16 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0211%16 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0017%16 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0010%15 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0111%15 Jul
anubis6–13-0.047%15 Jul
ancient0–13-0.1117%15 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0120%15 Jul
dust213–3-0.0918%15 Jul
mirage13–90.029%15 Jul
mirage8–130.0013%15 Jul
cache13–90.0120%15 Jul
inferno4–13-0.039%14 Jul
mirage13–70.0215%14 Jul
nuke10–13-0.056%14 Jul
dust26–13-0.0624%14 Jul
ancient8–13-0.1014%14 Jul
dust213–6-0.0314%13 Jul
cache4–13-0.0417%13 Jul
dust210–13-0.0612%12 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0320%12 Jul
dust213–9-0.0415%12 Jul
mirage14–160.0113%12 Jul
cache13–11-0.0312%11 Jul
cache13–70.0321%10 Jul
anubis13–60.073%10 Jul
dust213–80.0915%10 Jul
dust213–70.0218%9 Jul
mirage13–90.0111%9 Jul
nuke9–30.1118%9 Jul
cache10–130.0213%9 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0324%8 Jul
overpass9–130.0016%4 Jul
ancient13–40.0117%3 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0311%3 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0518%3 Jul
dust216–14-0.016%3 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0814%3 Jul
anubis5–130.0015%2 Jul
dust213–5-0.0723%2 Jul
nuke13–90.0619%1 Jul
ancient10–13-0.075%1 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0412%1 Jul
dust213–80.0626%29 Jun
dust25–13-0.0013%27 Jun
nuke2–13-0.080%27 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0118%27 Jun
dust215–15-0.018%26 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0214%26 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0310%26 Jun
anubis13–60.027%25 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0126%25 Jun
mirage13–80.0918%25 Jun
inferno10–130.0012%25 Jun
mirage13–80.1017%24 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0220%24 Jun
dust213–60.0411%24 Jun
dust213–70.0119%24 Jun
nuke16–140.0111%24 Jun
mirage8–130.0215%23 Jun
mirage5–11-0.090%23 Jun
mirage13–110.0915%22 Jun
inferno13–60.1116%22 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0121%21 Jun
mirage14–160.0719%21 Jun
ancient13–90.0317%20 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →