Oliviaaa — CS2 Stats

76561199060023578[U:1:1099757850]

794Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#10625 of 10641 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 755 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

755Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 755
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 146 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOliviaaaFACEITLevel 4 · 755 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO755csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning49
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4951Last 10049%Win rateWLWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression5.4
Utility4.1
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.9
Utility4.1
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time563ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–6
131Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC28121643%-0.02
ancientS2315865%-0.00
dust2B136746%-0.02
infernoD124833%-0.01
anubisA116555%0.02
cacheS64267%0.01
nukeD62433%-0.02
overpass1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

287Matches
48%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
72.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7142%0.9614.0
Dust25553%0.9213.6
Ancient4461%1.0117.0
Anubis4349%1.0312.7
Inferno3438%0.9215.9
Nuke2143%0.8513.4
Cache1362%1.0213.8
Overpass367%1.1613.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
74.5%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
565msReaction time
31.9%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
9.77HE damage / grenade
2.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4369 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.9318% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–30.0416%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0515%25 Aug
inferno13–60.1211%25 Aug
cache5–130.0023%24 Aug
cache13–110.0116%24 Aug
ancient13–60.0957%23 Aug
anubis13–110.0422%17 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0420%16 Aug
cache9–13-0.0219%16 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0212%16 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0322%16 Aug
mirage13–50.0212%16 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0515%16 Aug
cache13–30.0216%15 Aug
mirage13–16-0.019%15 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0817%15 Aug
cache13–3-0.0025%15 Aug
ancient13–70.0320%15 Aug
inferno5–130.0329%14 Aug
anubis13–40.0613%14 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0618%14 Aug
nuke10–130.0214%12 Aug
mirage8–13-0.078%12 Aug
mirage13–10-0.048%12 Aug
dust27–130.0221%11 Aug
anubis10–130.0113%10 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0113%10 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0316%9 Aug
mirage19–16-0.0310%9 Aug
ancient13–7-0.040%9 Aug
nuke13–6-0.049%9 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0317%7 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0116%7 Aug
ancient13–80.0710%2 Aug
mirage10–130.0522%2 Aug
anubis13–110.0420%2 Aug
dust213–11-0.0113%1 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0315%31 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0117%31 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0324%30 Jul
cache13–40.0523%30 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0014%27 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0219%27 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0817%27 Jul
dust213–7-0.0046%26 Jul
anubis13–30.0712%26 Jul
ancient9–13-0.050%25 Jul
mirage9–130.0121%24 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0226%15 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0123%15 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0312%14 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0220%14 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0720%13 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0017%13 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0827%12 Jul
ancient7–130.0525%12 Jul
anubis17–19-0.0315%12 Jul
inferno17–19-0.0312%7 Jul
dust27–13-0.0539%6 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0519%2 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0633%1 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0516%1 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0239%30 Jun
inferno10–130.0229%30 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0019%30 Jun
ancient10–130.0745%30 Jun
dust213–10-0.039%29 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0014%29 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0016%29 Jun
ancient9–130.049%28 Jun
dust213–11-0.0325%25 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0025%24 Jun
ancient13–110.0230%24 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0211%24 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0812%24 Jun
ancient19–16-0.0319%24 Jun
dust29–13-0.0424%24 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0723%24 Jun
ancient13–100.0121%24 Jun
dust25–13-0.0918%24 Jun
mirage19–150.0215%23 Jun
dust27–130.0136%23 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0710%23 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0311%23 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0213%23 Jun
dust219–22-0.0322%23 Jun
anubis13–10.0812%22 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0718%22 Jun
dust213–70.0224%22 Jun
dust213–100.0421%22 Jun
inferno13–110.0220%22 Jun
nuke11–130.0215%21 Jun
inferno12–16-0.0016%21 Jun
ancient12–16-0.047%21 Jun
ancient13–110.0412%21 Jun
inferno5–130.0120%21 Jun
inferno13–11-0.058%21 Jun
mirage13–60.0422%21 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0114%21 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0716%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →