Mili — CS2 Stats

76561199059517892[U:1:1099252164]

1,436Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,122Pink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6105 of 13916 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,432 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMiliFACEITLevel 7 · 1,432 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,122 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning50
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47485Last 10047%Win rateLLTLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression5.2
Utility4.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch1.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact0.2

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time551ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — anubis 13–6
131Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 10dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2071335%0.00
mirageB178947%-0.02
nukeB168850%0.00
infernoB168850%0.01
anubisB126650%0.01
ancientS107370%0.02
dust2D93633%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

134Matches
53%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
93.3ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2654%1.3717.8
Inferno2646%1.4018.9
Nuke2370%1.3518.9
Anubis1656%1.2618.7
Dust21650%1.2917.6
Ancient1267%1.4220.5
Vertigo450%1.2817.0
Train367%1.4923.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
540msReaction time
27.9%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
5.98HE damage / grenade
9.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3646 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.9337% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–13-0.0413%27 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0326%27 Aug
dust215–15-0.0215%26 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0520%26 Aug
nuke13–40.0611%25 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0121%24 Aug
anubis13–100.1115%22 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0726%22 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0413%22 Aug
cache11–130.0512%21 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0020%21 Aug
inferno16–14-0.027%20 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0113%20 Aug
dust25–13-0.0712%20 Aug
ancient8–130.0425%20 Aug
cache9–130.0210%20 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0221%19 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0525%19 Aug
inferno14–160.0522%18 Aug
inferno13–50.0232%18 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0110%18 Aug
inferno13–90.0417%17 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0118%17 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0131%16 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0035%16 Aug
cache11–13-0.0518%14 Aug
dust28–13-0.0330%14 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0320%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0318%8 Aug
cache13–50.0226%8 Aug
nuke13–10.0321%8 Aug
nuke14–160.0618%7 Aug
cache13–110.0227%7 Aug
mirage13–4-0.034%7 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0429%6 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0326%6 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0814%6 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0637%23 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0020%23 Jul
inferno4–130.0517%22 Jul
ancient13–40.0422%22 Jul
cache8–13-0.0122%22 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0217%22 Jul
dust215–150.0421%22 Jul
cache16–130.0216%22 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0914%22 Jul
dust25–13-0.0417%21 Jul
ancient13–100.0519%21 Jul
cache7–130.0216%17 Jul
dust213–9-0.0132%17 Jul
mirage16–120.0123%17 Jul
cache13–9-0.0219%16 Jul
inferno16–140.0421%16 Jul
cache13–90.0526%15 Jul
nuke16–120.0225%14 Jul
anubis13–60.0118%14 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0819%13 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0227%13 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0212%13 Jul
cache4–13-0.0218%13 Jul
nuke13–60.0427%13 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0613%11 Jul
cache15–15-0.0619%11 Jul
mirage13–50.0626%10 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0216%10 Jul
inferno4–120.0121%10 Jul
cache2–13-0.0128%9 Jul
inferno16–130.0722%9 Jul
inferno12–120.0132%8 Jul
mirage13–70.0922%8 Jul
nuke13–100.0219%7 Jul
cache2–7-0.0545%7 Jul
cache13–50.0622%7 Jul
cache13–100.1014%6 Jul
cache9–130.0118%6 Jul
cache4–130.0223%6 Jul
cache8–13-0.029%6 Jul
ancient13–60.0418%6 Jul
dust213–60.0423%6 Jul
anubis11–130.0018%5 Jul
mirage16–120.0623%2 Jul
ancient9–130.0014%2 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0336%1 Jul
inferno9–130.0423%1 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0538%30 Jun
dust213–100.0425%30 Jun
dust214–16-0.0122%27 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0413%27 Jun
nuke10–130.0417%26 Jun
nuke13–70.0115%26 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0116%26 Jun
inferno8–130.0130%25 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0829%25 Jun
anubis13–60.1127%25 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0414%24 Jun
ancient13–60.0914%23 Jun
nuke13–70.0114%23 Jun
inferno13–40.0117%23 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0219%23 Jun
anubis8–130.0221%17 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →